Impact of a digital training platform and tailored education on the chest image interpretation performance of healthcare professionals

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
L. McLaughlin , G. Johnstone , S.L. McFadden , C.M. Hughes , L. Nesbitt , R. Bond , J. McConnell
{"title":"Impact of a digital training platform and tailored education on the chest image interpretation performance of healthcare professionals","authors":"L. McLaughlin ,&nbsp;G. Johnstone ,&nbsp;S.L. McFadden ,&nbsp;C.M. Hughes ,&nbsp;L. Nesbitt ,&nbsp;R. Bond ,&nbsp;J. McConnell","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.04.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>With the use of expert consensus a digital training tool was developed which proved useful when teaching radiographers how to interpret chest images. The training tool included A) a search strategy and B) an educational video programme to communicate the search strategies using eye tracking technology.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multi-reader multi-case study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of a training tool and study day. The interventions were designed to cover a range of potential pathological presentations. Participants, physiotherapists and nurse practitioners working at a cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit (ICU), were asked to interpret 20 chest images at the beginning of the study and following access to each intervention. Participants received access to the training tool at different times for a period of 4–6 weeks. A study day was then be provided to all participants and interpretations of a different dataset were completed by all. Each participant was asked to complete a questionnaire to gain perceptions of the training provided.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-eight participants interpreted a total of 1680 chest radiographs. Improvements in specificity were noted across the participants. Sensitivity fell in both groups following both training interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Face to face learning and digital components are potentially useful in professional development and revision in chest x-ray interpretation for non-medical healthcare professionals working in an ICU setting.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>The training tool and study day may be useful as image interpretation revision aids or to accompany formal methods of education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742400107X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

With the use of expert consensus a digital training tool was developed which proved useful when teaching radiographers how to interpret chest images. The training tool included A) a search strategy and B) an educational video programme to communicate the search strategies using eye tracking technology.

Methods

A multi-reader multi-case study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of a training tool and study day. The interventions were designed to cover a range of potential pathological presentations. Participants, physiotherapists and nurse practitioners working at a cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit (ICU), were asked to interpret 20 chest images at the beginning of the study and following access to each intervention. Participants received access to the training tool at different times for a period of 4–6 weeks. A study day was then be provided to all participants and interpretations of a different dataset were completed by all. Each participant was asked to complete a questionnaire to gain perceptions of the training provided.

Results

Twenty-eight participants interpreted a total of 1680 chest radiographs. Improvements in specificity were noted across the participants. Sensitivity fell in both groups following both training interventions.

Conclusion

Face to face learning and digital components are potentially useful in professional development and revision in chest x-ray interpretation for non-medical healthcare professionals working in an ICU setting.

Implications for practice

The training tool and study day may be useful as image interpretation revision aids or to accompany formal methods of education.

数字培训平台和因材施教对医护人员胸部图像判读能力的影响。
介绍:在专家一致同意的基础上,我们开发了一种数字培训工具,该工具在教授放射技师如何解读胸部图像时非常有用。培训工具包括 A) 搜索策略和 B) 利用眼动跟踪技术传达搜索策略的教育视频:方法:开展了一项多阅片人员多案例研究,以评估培训工具和学习日的有效性。干预措施的设计涵盖了一系列潜在的病理表现。参与者是在心胸重症监护室 (ICU) 工作的物理治疗师和执业护士,他们在研究开始时和接受每项干预后都要解读 20 张胸部图像。参与者在 4-6 周内的不同时间使用培训工具。然后为所有参与者提供一个学习日,所有参与者都要完成对不同数据集的解读。每位参与者都被要求填写一份调查问卷,以了解他们对所提供培训的看法:结果:28 名参与者共判读了 1680 张胸片。所有参与者的特异性都有所提高。结论:面对面的学习和数字化组件都是有效的:结论:面对面的学习和数字化组件对在重症监护室工作的非医疗保健专业人员的胸部 X 光片解读的专业发展和复习有潜在的帮助:实践启示:培训工具和学习日可作为图像解读复习辅助工具,或配合正规教育方法使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信