A comparative study using gastric ultrasound to evaluate the safety of shortening the fasting time before pediatric echocardiography: a randomized controlled non-inferiority study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Journal of Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1007/s00540-024-03360-2
Eunah Cho, Ji Hee Kwak, June Huh, I-Seok Kang, Kyoung-Ho Ryu, Sung Hyun Lee, Jin Hee Ahn, Hyeong-Kyeong Choi, Jinyoung Song
{"title":"A comparative study using gastric ultrasound to evaluate the safety of shortening the fasting time before pediatric echocardiography: a randomized controlled non-inferiority study.","authors":"Eunah Cho, Ji Hee Kwak, June Huh, I-Seok Kang, Kyoung-Ho Ryu, Sung Hyun Lee, Jin Hee Ahn, Hyeong-Kyeong Choi, Jinyoung Song","doi":"10.1007/s00540-024-03360-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the gastric cross-sectional area (CSA) in the right lateral decubitus position (RLDP) during a 2-h fasting period is not larger than that during a conventional 4-h fasting period prior to pediatric echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>93 patients aged under 3 years scheduled for echocardiography under sedation were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups; 2-h fasting vs 4-h fasting. For group 4 h (n = 46), the patients were asked to be fasted for all types of liquid for more than 4 h, while group 2 h (n = 47) were asked to be fasted for all types of liquid for 2 h before echocardiography. Gastric ultrasound was performed before echocardiography, and CSA<sub>RLDP</sub> was measured. We compared CSA<sub>RLDP,</sub> incidence of at-risk stomach, fasting duration, and the incidence of major (pulmonary aspiration, aspiration pneumonia) and minor complications (nausea, retching, and vomiting, apnea, and bradycardia) between two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference of CSA<sub>RLDP</sub> (group 2 h-group 4 h) was 0.49 (- 0.18 to 1.17) cm<sup>2</sup>, and it was within the non-inferiority margin (Δ = 2.1 cm<sup>2</sup>). There was no difference in the incidence of at-risk stomach (P = 0.514). There was no significant difference in the incidence of major and minor complications between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two-hour fasting in pediatric patients who need an echocardiography did not increase major and minor complications and CSA significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03360-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the gastric cross-sectional area (CSA) in the right lateral decubitus position (RLDP) during a 2-h fasting period is not larger than that during a conventional 4-h fasting period prior to pediatric echocardiography.

Methods: 93 patients aged under 3 years scheduled for echocardiography under sedation were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups; 2-h fasting vs 4-h fasting. For group 4 h (n = 46), the patients were asked to be fasted for all types of liquid for more than 4 h, while group 2 h (n = 47) were asked to be fasted for all types of liquid for 2 h before echocardiography. Gastric ultrasound was performed before echocardiography, and CSARLDP was measured. We compared CSARLDP, incidence of at-risk stomach, fasting duration, and the incidence of major (pulmonary aspiration, aspiration pneumonia) and minor complications (nausea, retching, and vomiting, apnea, and bradycardia) between two groups.

Results: The mean difference of CSARLDP (group 2 h-group 4 h) was 0.49 (- 0.18 to 1.17) cm2, and it was within the non-inferiority margin (Δ = 2.1 cm2). There was no difference in the incidence of at-risk stomach (P = 0.514). There was no significant difference in the incidence of major and minor complications between the two groups.

Conclusion: Two-hour fasting in pediatric patients who need an echocardiography did not increase major and minor complications and CSA significantly.

Abstract Image

利用胃超声评估缩短小儿超声心动图检查前禁食时间的安全性的比较研究:随机对照非劣效性研究。
目的:本研究旨在证明,在小儿超声心动图检查前,右侧卧位(RLDP)禁食 2 小时的胃横截面积(CSA)并不比常规禁食 4 小时的胃横截面积(CSA)大。方法:研究人员招募了 93 名 3 岁以下、计划在镇静状态下接受超声心动图检查的患者,并将其随机分为两组:禁食 2 小时组和禁食 4 小时组。禁食 4 小时组(46 人)要求患者禁食各种液体 4 小时以上,而禁食 2 小时组(47 人)要求患者在超声心动图检查前禁食各种液体 2 小时。超声心动图检查前进行胃超声检查,并测量 CSARLDP。我们比较了两组患者的 CSARLDP、高危胃的发生率、禁食时间以及主要并发症(肺吸入、吸入性肺炎)和轻微并发症(恶心、反胃和呕吐、呼吸暂停和心动过缓)的发生率:CSARLDP(2小时组-4小时组)的平均差异为0.49(- 0.18至1.17)平方厘米,在非劣效区(Δ = 2.1平方厘米)内。危险胃的发生率没有差异(P = 0.514)。两组主要和次要并发症的发生率无明显差异:结论:需要进行超声心动图检查的儿科患者禁食两小时不会显著增加主要和次要并发症以及 CSA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信