Do veterans with risky substance use (RSU) use distinct pain treatment modalities?

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Sarah Meshberg-Cohen PhD, Kathryn Gilstad-Hayden MS, Steve Martino PhD, Christine M. Lazar MPH, John Sellinger PhD, Marc I. Rosen MD
{"title":"Do veterans with risky substance use (RSU) use distinct pain treatment modalities?","authors":"Sarah Meshberg-Cohen PhD,&nbsp;Kathryn Gilstad-Hayden MS,&nbsp;Steve Martino PhD,&nbsp;Christine M. Lazar MPH,&nbsp;John Sellinger PhD,&nbsp;Marc I. Rosen MD","doi":"10.1111/ajad.13620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Risky substance use (RSU) is common among people with chronic pain and is associated with worse pain treatment outcomes. Nonopioid treatment is recommended, but it is unknown whether people with RSU use different or fewer pain treatment modalities. This study describes use of different pain treatments by veterans with and without RSU and those receiving versus not receiving opioid medication.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Veterans (<i>N</i> = 924) who filed service-connected disability claims related to musculoskeletal conditions and rated their pain four or higher on the Numeric Rating Scale, reported on 25 different pain services in the preceding 90 days. Recent RSU was identified via Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Test (ASSIST) cutoffs and/or nail sample toxicology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, RSU was not associated with number of provider-delivered or self-delivered pain modalities. Over-the-counter medications (71%), self-structured exercise (69%), and nonopioid prescription medications (38%) were the most used modalities. Veterans receiving prescribed opioids (8.4%) were more likely to see primary care, receive injections, and attend exercise and/or meditation classes, compared to those without opioid prescriptions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Opioid and nonopioid pain treatment utilization did not differ based on RSU, and those prescribed opioids were more likely to engage in other nonopioid pain treatments. Regardless of RSU, veterans appear willing to try provider-delivered (58%) and self-delivered (79%) pain treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Scientific Significance</h3>\n \n <p>In this first-ever evaluation of 25 different pain treatment modalities among veterans with and without RSU, people with RSU did not use less treatment modalities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":"33 6","pages":"675-684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal on Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajad.13620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Risky substance use (RSU) is common among people with chronic pain and is associated with worse pain treatment outcomes. Nonopioid treatment is recommended, but it is unknown whether people with RSU use different or fewer pain treatment modalities. This study describes use of different pain treatments by veterans with and without RSU and those receiving versus not receiving opioid medication.

Methods

Veterans (N = 924) who filed service-connected disability claims related to musculoskeletal conditions and rated their pain four or higher on the Numeric Rating Scale, reported on 25 different pain services in the preceding 90 days. Recent RSU was identified via Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Test (ASSIST) cutoffs and/or nail sample toxicology.

Results

Overall, RSU was not associated with number of provider-delivered or self-delivered pain modalities. Over-the-counter medications (71%), self-structured exercise (69%), and nonopioid prescription medications (38%) were the most used modalities. Veterans receiving prescribed opioids (8.4%) were more likely to see primary care, receive injections, and attend exercise and/or meditation classes, compared to those without opioid prescriptions.

Discussion and Conclusions

Opioid and nonopioid pain treatment utilization did not differ based on RSU, and those prescribed opioids were more likely to engage in other nonopioid pain treatments. Regardless of RSU, veterans appear willing to try provider-delivered (58%) and self-delivered (79%) pain treatment.

Scientific Significance

In this first-ever evaluation of 25 different pain treatment modalities among veterans with and without RSU, people with RSU did not use less treatment modalities.

使用危险物质(RSU)的退伍军人是否使用不同的疼痛治疗方法?
背景和目的:在慢性疼痛患者中,危险物质使用(RSU)很常见,并且与疼痛治疗效果较差有关。建议使用非阿片类药物治疗,但目前尚不清楚有 RSU 的人是否使用不同的疼痛治疗方法或使用较少的疼痛治疗方法。本研究描述了患有和未患有 RSU 的退伍军人以及接受和未接受阿片类药物治疗的退伍军人使用不同疼痛治疗方法的情况:退伍军人(N = 924)提交了与肌肉骨骼状况相关的因公伤残索赔,并在数字评级量表中将其疼痛评级为四级或四级以上,他们报告了在过去 90 天内接受的 25 种不同的疼痛服务。最近的 RSU 通过酒精、吸烟和物质参与测试 (ASSIST) 临界值和/或指甲样本毒理学进行鉴定:总体而言,RSU 与医疗服务提供者提供或自我提供的疼痛方式数量无关。非处方药(71%)、自我锻炼(69%)和非阿片类处方药(38%)是使用最多的方式。与没有阿片类药物处方的退伍军人相比,接受阿片类药物处方的退伍军人(8.4%)更有可能去看初级保健医生、接受注射以及参加运动和/或冥想课程:阿片类药物和非阿片类药物疼痛治疗的利用率并不因 RSU 而异,开具阿片类药物处方的退伍军人更有可能接受其他非阿片类药物疼痛治疗。不管是哪种 RSU,退伍军人似乎都愿意尝试提供者提供(58%)和自我提供(79%)的疼痛治疗:在这项首次对患有和未患有 RSU 的退伍军人的 25 种不同疼痛治疗方式进行的评估中,患有 RSU 的人使用的治疗方式并没有减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The American Journal on Addictions is the official journal of the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry. The Academy encourages research on the etiology, prevention, identification, and treatment of substance abuse; thus, the journal provides a forum for the dissemination of information in the extensive field of addiction. Each issue of this publication covers a wide variety of topics ranging from codependence to genetics, epidemiology to dual diagnostics, etiology to neuroscience, and much more. Features of the journal, all written by experts in the field, include special overview articles, clinical or basic research papers, clinical updates, and book reviews within the area of addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信