Four Years of Meander-Bend Evolution Captured by Drone-Based Lidar Reveals Lack of Width Maintenance on the White River, Indiana, USA

IF 3.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
H. K. Martin, D. A. Edmonds, Q. W. Lewis
{"title":"Four Years of Meander-Bend Evolution Captured by Drone-Based Lidar Reveals Lack of Width Maintenance on the White River, Indiana, USA","authors":"H. K. Martin,&nbsp;D. A. Edmonds,&nbsp;Q. W. Lewis","doi":"10.1029/2023JF007574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Meandering rivers experience fluctuations in width whenever riverbanks migrate in different directions or at different rates, which can be observed after individual floods. However, meandering rivers maintain approximately constant widths over decadal timescales. This implies some timescale below which width fluctuates as banks migrate independently, and above which width is maintained by a bank-coupling process. This coupling is thought to occur either as point bar deposition events induce cutbank erosion (bar-push), or as cutbank erosion events induce point bar deposition (bank-pull). This coupling, however, has been challenging to observe in natural rivers due to limited event-scale field data. We present results from a 4.5-year campaign with 22 drone-based lidar surveys of a single point bar and cutbank (∼0.35 km<sup>2</sup> in area) on the White River near Worthington, Indiana, USA. The middle point bar experienced net erosion (5,400 m<sup>3</sup>), but net aggradation (17,100 m<sup>3</sup>) between 2019 and 2022 when including perennially submerged regions. This aggradation was less than the 35,700 m<sup>3</sup> of cutbank erosion over the same period. Combined, we have observed widening (1.58 m/yr bend-averaged; 3.08 m/yr near apex) over the study period as point bar deposition has not kept up with cutbank erosion. Finally, we suggest that the difference between bar-push and bank-pull as width-maintenance mechanisms may not be resolvable by observing bend widening or narrowing alone without an advancement of current theory, such as determining a long-term equilibrium width and measuring deviations relative thereto.</p>","PeriodicalId":15887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","volume":"129 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023JF007574","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023JF007574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meandering rivers experience fluctuations in width whenever riverbanks migrate in different directions or at different rates, which can be observed after individual floods. However, meandering rivers maintain approximately constant widths over decadal timescales. This implies some timescale below which width fluctuates as banks migrate independently, and above which width is maintained by a bank-coupling process. This coupling is thought to occur either as point bar deposition events induce cutbank erosion (bar-push), or as cutbank erosion events induce point bar deposition (bank-pull). This coupling, however, has been challenging to observe in natural rivers due to limited event-scale field data. We present results from a 4.5-year campaign with 22 drone-based lidar surveys of a single point bar and cutbank (∼0.35 km2 in area) on the White River near Worthington, Indiana, USA. The middle point bar experienced net erosion (5,400 m3), but net aggradation (17,100 m3) between 2019 and 2022 when including perennially submerged regions. This aggradation was less than the 35,700 m3 of cutbank erosion over the same period. Combined, we have observed widening (1.58 m/yr bend-averaged; 3.08 m/yr near apex) over the study period as point bar deposition has not kept up with cutbank erosion. Finally, we suggest that the difference between bar-push and bank-pull as width-maintenance mechanisms may not be resolvable by observing bend widening or narrowing alone without an advancement of current theory, such as determining a long-term equilibrium width and measuring deviations relative thereto.

Abstract Image

无人机激光雷达捕捉到的蜿蜒弯曲四年演变过程揭示了美国印第安纳州白河缺乏宽度维护的问题
每当河岸向不同方向或以不同速度迁移时,蜿蜒河流的宽度就会发生波动,这可以在个别洪水过后观察到。然而,蜿蜒河流的宽度在十年时间尺度内大致保持不变。这就意味着,在某个时间尺度以下,宽度会随着河岸的独立迁移而波动,而在这个时间尺度以上,宽度则由河岸耦合过程来维持。这种耦合作用被认为是在点状条带沉积事件诱发切岸侵蚀(条带推动)或切岸侵蚀事件诱发点状条带沉积(河岸拉动)时发生的。然而,由于事件尺度的实地数据有限,要在自然河流中观察到这种耦合关系非常困难。我们展示了对美国印第安纳州沃辛顿附近的白河上的一个点条石和切岸(面积为 0.35 平方公里)进行的为期 4.5 年、共 22 次无人机激光雷达勘测的结果。在 2019 年至 2022 年期间,中间点状浅滩经历了净侵蚀(5,400 立方米),但包括常年淹没区域在内,则经历了净退化(17,100 立方米)。这一增量小于同期 35,700 立方米的切岸侵蚀量。此外,我们还观察到,在研究期间,由于点状条石沉积跟不上切岸侵蚀的速度,河道有所加宽(弯曲平均宽度为 1.58 米/年;顶点附近宽度为 3.08 米/年)。最后,我们认为,如果不推进当前的理论,如确定长期平衡宽度并测量其偏差,仅通过观察弯曲的扩大或缩小,可能无法解决作为宽度维持机制的横杆推动和河岸拉动之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
162
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信