Bridging the gaps in understanding POD and POCD: A thorough examination of genetic and clinical biomarkers

Q2 Nursing
Sandra Figueiredo , Miguel Devezas
{"title":"Bridging the gaps in understanding POD and POCD: A thorough examination of genetic and clinical biomarkers","authors":"Sandra Figueiredo ,&nbsp;Miguel Devezas","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2024.100401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This systematic review delves into the complex and multifaceted nature of Postoperative Delirium (POD) and Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD), conditions sharing common phenotypes and risk factors. The pathophysiology of POD/POCD, particularly prevalent in vulnerable groups like the elderly, is explored, highlighting the roles of inflammation, cellular stress, and neural injuries. The review scrutinizes 24,354 research publications, selecting 176 and a subset of 24 for in-depth analysis, to unravel the intricate web of potential biomarkers and their associations with cognitive decline post-surgery. This systematic review was performed according to norms of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). The findings underscore the lack of universally accepted biomarkers, reflecting the diversity in clinical presentations and the myriad of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. The review also emphasizes the evolving nature of POCD's definition and the need for further research to elucidate the genetic underpinnings of these postoperative complications. Future directions in neuropsychology and biomedicine are proposed to bridge existing knowledge gaps and enhance our understanding of POD and POCD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603024000359/pdfft?md5=e540900d2637682923b803ddafff9e51&pid=1-s2.0-S2405603024000359-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603024000359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review delves into the complex and multifaceted nature of Postoperative Delirium (POD) and Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD), conditions sharing common phenotypes and risk factors. The pathophysiology of POD/POCD, particularly prevalent in vulnerable groups like the elderly, is explored, highlighting the roles of inflammation, cellular stress, and neural injuries. The review scrutinizes 24,354 research publications, selecting 176 and a subset of 24 for in-depth analysis, to unravel the intricate web of potential biomarkers and their associations with cognitive decline post-surgery. This systematic review was performed according to norms of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). The findings underscore the lack of universally accepted biomarkers, reflecting the diversity in clinical presentations and the myriad of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. The review also emphasizes the evolving nature of POCD's definition and the need for further research to elucidate the genetic underpinnings of these postoperative complications. Future directions in neuropsychology and biomedicine are proposed to bridge existing knowledge gaps and enhance our understanding of POD and POCD.

缩小对 POD 和 POCD 的认识差距:对基因和临床生物标志物的全面研究
本系统综述深入探讨了术后谵妄(POD)和术后认知功能障碍(POCD)的复杂性和多面性,这两种疾病具有共同的表型和风险因素。文章探讨了 POD/POCD 的病理生理学,强调了炎症、细胞应激和神经损伤的作用,尤其是在老年人等弱势群体中的流行。该综述仔细研究了 24,354 篇研究论文,挑选出 176 篇和 24 篇子集进行深入分析,以揭开潜在生物标志物的复杂网络及其与手术后认知能力下降的关联。该系统综述是根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)的规范进行的。研究结果强调了缺乏普遍接受的生物标志物,这反映了临床表现的多样性和潜在病理生理机制的多样性。综述还强调了 POCD 定义的不断演变性,以及进一步研究阐明这些术后并发症的遗传基础的必要性。文章还提出了神经心理学和生物医学的未来发展方向,以弥补现有的知识差距,加深我们对 POD 和 POCD 的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信