Trabecular Metal Augments During Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Brian C. Chung MD , Nathanael D. Heckmann MD , Matthew C. Gallo MD , Thomas Steck MD , Christian Jimenez MD , Daniel A. Oakes MD
{"title":"Trabecular Metal Augments During Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty","authors":"Brian C. Chung MD ,&nbsp;Nathanael D. Heckmann MD ,&nbsp;Matthew C. Gallo MD ,&nbsp;Thomas Steck MD ,&nbsp;Christian Jimenez MD ,&nbsp;Daniel A. Oakes MD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Trabecular metal augments (TMAs) have been extensively used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) to address acetabular bone defects. However, limited data exists regarding TMA utilization during primary THA. This study aims to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of TMAs used during primary THA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-institution retrospective case series of primary THA patients treated with TMA between 2010 and 2019 was performed. Patient demographics, complications, and revisions were recorded. Cup position, center of rotation, leg length, and radiolucent lines were assessed radiographically. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compute implant survivorship.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six patients (30 hips) were included with average age of 52.6 ± 15.3 years (range: 22-78) and mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 2.1 years (range: 2.0-8.9). Most TMAs were indicated for developmental dysplasia of the hip (n = 18; 60.0%). On average, hip center of rotation was lowered 1.5 ± 1.3 cm and lateralized 1.2 ± 1.5 cm, while leg length and global offset were increased by 2.4 ± 1.2 cm and 0.4 ± 1.0 cm, respectively. At final follow-up, 3 hips (10.0%) required revision: one (3.3%) for aseptic loosening and 2 (6.7%) for instability. No patients had progressive radiolucent lines at final follow-up. Five-year survival with aseptic loosening and all-cause revision as endpoints was 100% (95% confidence interval: 90.0%-100.0%) and 92.1% (95% confidence interval: 81.3%-100.0%), respectively. One patient required revision for aseptic loosening after the 5-year mark.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Trabecular metal augmentation during primary THA demonstrates satisfactory early to mid-term outcomes. TMA is a viable option for complex primary THA when bone loss is encountered or secondary support is required.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level IV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124001201/pdfft?md5=b8f78ed8596a7217aae41e893939526c&pid=1-s2.0-S2352344124001201-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124001201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Trabecular metal augments (TMAs) have been extensively used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) to address acetabular bone defects. However, limited data exists regarding TMA utilization during primary THA. This study aims to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of TMAs used during primary THA.

Methods

A single-institution retrospective case series of primary THA patients treated with TMA between 2010 and 2019 was performed. Patient demographics, complications, and revisions were recorded. Cup position, center of rotation, leg length, and radiolucent lines were assessed radiographically. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compute implant survivorship.

Results

Twenty-six patients (30 hips) were included with average age of 52.6 ± 15.3 years (range: 22-78) and mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 2.1 years (range: 2.0-8.9). Most TMAs were indicated for developmental dysplasia of the hip (n = 18; 60.0%). On average, hip center of rotation was lowered 1.5 ± 1.3 cm and lateralized 1.2 ± 1.5 cm, while leg length and global offset were increased by 2.4 ± 1.2 cm and 0.4 ± 1.0 cm, respectively. At final follow-up, 3 hips (10.0%) required revision: one (3.3%) for aseptic loosening and 2 (6.7%) for instability. No patients had progressive radiolucent lines at final follow-up. Five-year survival with aseptic loosening and all-cause revision as endpoints was 100% (95% confidence interval: 90.0%-100.0%) and 92.1% (95% confidence interval: 81.3%-100.0%), respectively. One patient required revision for aseptic loosening after the 5-year mark.

Conclusions

Trabecular metal augmentation during primary THA demonstrates satisfactory early to mid-term outcomes. TMA is a viable option for complex primary THA when bone loss is encountered or secondary support is required.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

复杂原发性全髋关节置换术中的骨小梁金属假体
背景在翻修全髋关节置换术(THA)中已广泛使用蟹状金属增量体(TMA)来解决髋臼骨缺损问题。然而,有关在初次全髋关节置换术中使用 TMA 的数据却很有限。本研究旨在评估在初治髋关节置换术中使用 TMA 的临床和放射学结果。方法对 2010 年至 2019 年期间接受 TMA 治疗的初治髋关节置换术患者进行了单机构回顾性病例系列研究。记录了患者的人口统计学特征、并发症和翻修情况。对髋臼杯位置、旋转中心、腿长和放射线进行放射学评估。结果共纳入 26 例患者(30 个髋关节),平均年龄为 52.6 ± 15.3 岁(范围:22-78),平均随访时间为 4.1 ± 2.1 年(范围:2.0-8.9)。大多数TMA适用于髋关节发育不良(n = 18;60.0%)。平均而言,髋关节旋转中心降低了 1.5 ± 1.3 厘米,侧移了 1.2 ± 1.5 厘米,而腿长和整体偏移分别增加了 2.4 ± 1.2 厘米和 0.4 ± 1.0 厘米。在最后的随访中,有3个髋关节(10.0%)需要翻修:1个(3.3%)是因为无菌性松动,2个(6.7%)是因为不稳定。在最终随访中,没有患者出现进行性放射线透亮。以无菌性松动和全因翻修为终点的五年生存率分别为100%(95%置信区间:90.0%-100.0%)和92.1%(95%置信区间:81.3%-100.0%)。一名患者在5年后因无菌性松动需要进行翻修。当遇到骨质流失或需要二次支持时,TMA 是复杂的初级 THA 的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信