Impact of development interventions on individual risk preferences: Evidence from a field-lab experiment and survey data

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Noemi Pace , Silvio Daidone
{"title":"Impact of development interventions on individual risk preferences: Evidence from a field-lab experiment and survey data","authors":"Noemi Pace ,&nbsp;Silvio Daidone","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In rural settings, individual risk preferences represent one of the channels driving the shift from low-return/low-risk activities towards high-return/high-risk activities. This study takes advantage of data collected for the impact evaluation of the Child Grants Programme, an unconditional cash transfer program, and the Sustainable Poverty Reduction through Income, Nutrition and Access to Government Services (SPRINGS) project, a community development package, in rural Lesotho. The paper has two major goals. First, we investigate the effects of the programs on risk preferences measured via laboratory experiments in the field and a survey instrument. Second, we perform a mediation analysis to quantify the extent to which the programs affect risky investment decisions in real life through changes in risk preferences. Results show that the combination of programs decreases risk aversion, partially mediating the impact of the programs on risky agricultural investment decisions in real life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In rural settings, individual risk preferences represent one of the channels driving the shift from low-return/low-risk activities towards high-return/high-risk activities. This study takes advantage of data collected for the impact evaluation of the Child Grants Programme, an unconditional cash transfer program, and the Sustainable Poverty Reduction through Income, Nutrition and Access to Government Services (SPRINGS) project, a community development package, in rural Lesotho. The paper has two major goals. First, we investigate the effects of the programs on risk preferences measured via laboratory experiments in the field and a survey instrument. Second, we perform a mediation analysis to quantify the extent to which the programs affect risky investment decisions in real life through changes in risk preferences. Results show that the combination of programs decreases risk aversion, partially mediating the impact of the programs on risky agricultural investment decisions in real life.

发展干预对个人风险偏好的影响:来自现场实验室实验和调查数据的证据
在农村环境中,个人风险偏好是推动从低收益/低风险活动向高收益/高风险活动转变的渠道之一。本研究利用了为莱索托农村地区无条件现金转移计划 "儿童补助金计划 "和社区发展一揽子计划 "通过收入、营养和获得政府服务实现可持续减贫(SPRINGS)项目 "的影响评估所收集的数据。本文有两个主要目标。首先,我们通过实地实验室实验和调查工具,研究这些项目对风险偏好的影响。其次,我们进行了中介分析,以量化这些计划通过风险偏好的变化对现实生活中的风险投资决策产生影响的程度。结果表明,计划的组合降低了风险规避程度,从而部分调节了计划对现实生活中的风险农业投资决策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信