Faculty Development Provided During Work Hours: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study for Developing Clinician Educators.

Leila W Zuo, Landon J Crippes, Amy K Miller Juve
{"title":"Faculty Development Provided During Work Hours: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study for Developing Clinician Educators.","authors":"Leila W Zuo, Landon J Crippes, Amy K Miller Juve","doi":"10.46374/VolXXVI_Issue2_MillerJuve","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Faculty development is important but often limited by conflict with ongoing responsibilities. The Oregon Health & Science University Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine schedules more faculty physicians to work on Wednesdays, with nonclinical time in the morning and a clinical assignment in the afternoon, to facilitate a resident physician academic half-day (AHD). We designed a novel faculty development course to run in the mornings of the AHD using Kern's 6-step approach to curriculum development and hypothesized that it would be feasible and satisfactory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A needs assessment was performed. Two experts in medical education developed the curriculum and sought faculty with medical education training to lead sessions. Five participants completed pre-intervention, daily session, and post-intervention surveys. Satisfaction was evaluated by surveys. Feasibility was evaluated by session attendance and surveys. Kirkpatrick's model for program evaluation was used, and a thematic analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants responded \"Strongly Agree\" to all participant satisfaction post-intervention questions. All participants were able to meet the >50% attendance goal, only missing sessions when pre-call, post-call, on vacation, or ill. All participants reported changes in behavior and reported developing their clinician educator professional identities. One participant reported re-affirming their commitment to academic medicine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This faculty development pilot course provided during work hours was feasible, and participants were highly satisfied. In addition, thematic analysis suggests that the course helped faculty develop a clinician educator professional identity and changed their behavior. Future work will include a qualitative study to understand the impact on participant behavior and professional identity formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"26 2","pages":"E727"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11150989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/VolXXVI_Issue2_MillerJuve","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Faculty development is important but often limited by conflict with ongoing responsibilities. The Oregon Health & Science University Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine schedules more faculty physicians to work on Wednesdays, with nonclinical time in the morning and a clinical assignment in the afternoon, to facilitate a resident physician academic half-day (AHD). We designed a novel faculty development course to run in the mornings of the AHD using Kern's 6-step approach to curriculum development and hypothesized that it would be feasible and satisfactory.

Methods: A needs assessment was performed. Two experts in medical education developed the curriculum and sought faculty with medical education training to lead sessions. Five participants completed pre-intervention, daily session, and post-intervention surveys. Satisfaction was evaluated by surveys. Feasibility was evaluated by session attendance and surveys. Kirkpatrick's model for program evaluation was used, and a thematic analysis was performed.

Results: All participants responded "Strongly Agree" to all participant satisfaction post-intervention questions. All participants were able to meet the >50% attendance goal, only missing sessions when pre-call, post-call, on vacation, or ill. All participants reported changes in behavior and reported developing their clinician educator professional identities. One participant reported re-affirming their commitment to academic medicine.

Conclusions: This faculty development pilot course provided during work hours was feasible, and participants were highly satisfied. In addition, thematic analysis suggests that the course helped faculty develop a clinician educator professional identity and changed their behavior. Future work will include a qualitative study to understand the impact on participant behavior and professional identity formation.

工作时间提供的教师发展:培养临床教育工作者的混合方法试点研究。
背景:教职员工的发展非常重要,但往往受到与日常职责冲突的限制。俄勒冈健康与科学大学麻醉学与围术期医学系将更多的教职医师安排在每周三工作,上午为非临床时间,下午为临床任务,以促进住院医师学术半日(AHD)。我们采用 Kern 的 6 步课程开发方法设计了一个新颖的师资开发课程,并假设该课程可行且令人满意:方法:进行需求评估。两位医学教育专家开发了课程,并寻找受过医学教育培训的教师来主持课程。五名参与者分别完成了干预前、日常课程和干预后调查。满意度通过调查进行评估。可行性通过课程出席率和调查进行评估。采用柯克帕特里克计划评估模型,并进行了主题分析:所有参与者都对干预后的所有满意度问题回答 "非常同意"。所有参与者的出勤率都超过了 50%,只有在出勤前、出勤后、休假或生病时才会缺席。所有参与者都报告了行为上的改变,并表示发展了他们的临床教育者专业身份。一名学员表示,他们再次确认了对学术医学的承诺:结论:在工作时间提供的教师发展试点课程是可行的,参与者非常满意。此外,主题分析表明,该课程有助于教师发展临床教育者的专业身份,并改变了他们的行为。今后的工作将包括开展一项定性研究,以了解该课程对参与者行为和专业身份形成的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信