[Large language models from OpenAI, Google, Meta, X and Co. : The role of "closed" and "open" models in radiology].

Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1007/s00117-024-01327-8
Sebastian Nowak, Alois M Sprinkart
{"title":"[Large language models from OpenAI, Google, Meta, X and Co. : The role of \"closed\" and \"open\" models in radiology].","authors":"Sebastian Nowak, Alois M Sprinkart","doi":"10.1007/s00117-024-01327-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2023, the release of ChatGPT triggered an artificial intelligence (AI) boom. The underlying large language models (LLM) of the nonprofit organization \"OpenAI\" are not freely available under open-source licenses, which does not allow on-site implementation inside secure clinic networks. However, efforts are being made by open-source communities, start-ups and large tech companies to democratize the use of LLMs. This opens up the possibility of using LLMs in a data protection-compliant manner and even adapting them to our own data.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This paper aims to explain the potential of privacy-compliant local LLMs for radiology and to provide insights into the \"open\" versus \"closed\" dynamics of the currently rapidly developing field of AI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PubMed search for radiology articles with LLMs and subjective selection of references in the sense of a narrative key topic article.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Various stakeholders, including large tech companies such as Meta, Google and X, but also European start-ups such as Mistral AI, contribute to the democratization of LLMs by publishing the models (open weights) or by publishing the model and source code (open source). Their performance is lower than current \"closed\" LLMs, such as GPT‑4 from OpenAI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite differences in performance, open and thus locally implementable LLMs show great promise for improving the efficiency and quality of diagnostic reporting as well as interaction with patients and enable retrospective extraction of diagnostic information for secondary use of clinical free-text databases for research, teaching or clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":74635,"journal":{"name":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"779-786"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-024-01327-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2023, the release of ChatGPT triggered an artificial intelligence (AI) boom. The underlying large language models (LLM) of the nonprofit organization "OpenAI" are not freely available under open-source licenses, which does not allow on-site implementation inside secure clinic networks. However, efforts are being made by open-source communities, start-ups and large tech companies to democratize the use of LLMs. This opens up the possibility of using LLMs in a data protection-compliant manner and even adapting them to our own data.

Objectives: This paper aims to explain the potential of privacy-compliant local LLMs for radiology and to provide insights into the "open" versus "closed" dynamics of the currently rapidly developing field of AI.

Materials and methods: PubMed search for radiology articles with LLMs and subjective selection of references in the sense of a narrative key topic article.

Results: Various stakeholders, including large tech companies such as Meta, Google and X, but also European start-ups such as Mistral AI, contribute to the democratization of LLMs by publishing the models (open weights) or by publishing the model and source code (open source). Their performance is lower than current "closed" LLMs, such as GPT‑4 from OpenAI.

Conclusion: Despite differences in performance, open and thus locally implementable LLMs show great promise for improving the efficiency and quality of diagnostic reporting as well as interaction with patients and enable retrospective extraction of diagnostic information for secondary use of clinical free-text databases for research, teaching or clinical application.

[来自 OpenAI、Google、Meta、X 等公司的大型语言模型:"封闭 "和 "开放 "模型在放射学中的作用]。
背景:2023 年,ChatGPT 的发布引发了人工智能(AI)热潮。非营利组织 "OpenAI "的底层大型语言模型(LLM)无法根据开源许可免费获取,因此无法在安全的诊所网络内现场实施。不过,开源社区、初创企业和大型科技公司正在努力实现 LLM 使用的民主化。这为以符合数据保护的方式使用 LLM,甚至将其应用于我们自己的数据提供了可能:本文旨在解释符合隐私要求的本地 LLMs 在放射学方面的潜力,并深入探讨当前快速发展的人工智能领域的 "开放 "与 "封闭 "动态:在PubMed上搜索放射学文章中的LLMs,并从叙述性关键主题文章的意义上主观选择参考文献:包括Meta、谷歌和X等大型科技公司在内的各利益相关方,以及Mistral AI等欧洲初创公司,通过发布模型(开放权重)或发布模型和源代码(开源),为LLM的民主化做出了贡献。它们的性能低于目前的 "封闭式 "LLM,如 OpenAI 的 GPT-4:尽管性能存在差异,但开放的、因而可在本地实施的 LLMs 在提高诊断报告的效率和质量以及与患者的互动方面显示出了巨大的前景,并且能够回溯提取诊断信息,以便二次使用临床自由文本数据库,用于研究、教学或临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信