Antithrombin restriction in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (ARES): A multidisciplinary approach.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Perfusion-Uk Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1177/02676591241260179
Jade C Lam, Erwin H Lam, Sai Pidathala, Josna P Padiyar
{"title":"Antithrombin restriction in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (ARES): A multidisciplinary approach.","authors":"Jade C Lam, Erwin H Lam, Sai Pidathala, Josna P Padiyar","doi":"10.1177/02676591241260179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Antithrombin (AT) replacement is occasionally utilized in the setting of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-associated heparin resistance. Although past studies emphasized the high costs and limited clinical benefit of AT supplementation,  guidance on strategies to prevent unnecessary use remain lacking.<i>Methods:</i> In this retrospective study, we evaluated the cost, efficacy, and safety outcomes three years pre- and post-implementation of an AT restriction protocol in adult ECMO patients. The primary endpoint was the cost spent on anticoagulation and AT normalized to ECMO duration. Secondary endpoints included thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes.<i>Results:</i> 175 patients were included for analysis (pre-restriction protocol n = 87; post-restriction protocol n = 88). Implementation of the restriction resulted in complete elimination of AT use and significantly reduced the primary cost endpoint from $1009.20 to $42.99 per ECMO day (<i>p</i> < .001). There was no significant change in occurrence of new Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) (<i>p</i> = .099). Those in the pre-implementation group had significantly higher rates of transfusions (<i>p</i> < .001) and ISTH major bleeding (<i>p</i> < .001). Outcomes remained significant after exclusion of patients with coronavirus infections.<i>Conclusion:</i> Results of this study exemplify how AT restriction can be successfully implemented to decrease anticoagulation-associated costs without jeopardizing the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ECMO patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"742-749"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241260179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antithrombin (AT) replacement is occasionally utilized in the setting of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-associated heparin resistance. Although past studies emphasized the high costs and limited clinical benefit of AT supplementation,  guidance on strategies to prevent unnecessary use remain lacking.Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the cost, efficacy, and safety outcomes three years pre- and post-implementation of an AT restriction protocol in adult ECMO patients. The primary endpoint was the cost spent on anticoagulation and AT normalized to ECMO duration. Secondary endpoints included thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes.Results: 175 patients were included for analysis (pre-restriction protocol n = 87; post-restriction protocol n = 88). Implementation of the restriction resulted in complete elimination of AT use and significantly reduced the primary cost endpoint from $1009.20 to $42.99 per ECMO day (p < .001). There was no significant change in occurrence of new Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) (p = .099). Those in the pre-implementation group had significantly higher rates of transfusions (p < .001) and ISTH major bleeding (p < .001). Outcomes remained significant after exclusion of patients with coronavirus infections.Conclusion: Results of this study exemplify how AT restriction can be successfully implemented to decrease anticoagulation-associated costs without jeopardizing the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ECMO patients.

体外膜氧合支持(ARES)中的抗凝血酶限制:多学科方法。
背景:在体外膜氧合(ECMO)相关肝素抵抗的情况下,偶尔会使用抗凝血酶(AT)替代物。尽管过去的研究强调了补充 AT 的高成本和有限的临床益处,但仍缺乏防止不必要使用的策略指导:在这项回顾性研究中,我们评估了成人 ECMO 患者实施 AT 限制方案前后三年的成本、疗效和安全性结果。主要终点是抗凝和 AT 费用与 ECMO 持续时间的关系。次要终点包括血栓栓塞和出血结果:175 名患者被纳入分析(限制前方案 n = 87;限制后方案 n = 88)。实施限制后,AT 的使用完全消失,主要成本终点从每 ECMO 天 1009.20 美元显著降至 42.99 美元(p < .001)。新的静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)发生率没有明显变化(p = .099)。实施前组的输血率(p < .001)和 ISTH 大出血率(p < .001)明显更高。在排除冠状病毒感染患者后,结果仍有意义:本研究结果说明了如何成功实施 AT 限制,以降低与抗凝相关的费用,同时又不影响 ECMO 患者的出血和血栓风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信