Amphetamine and methylphenidate potential on the recovery from stroke and traumatic brain injury: a review.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Reviews in the Neurosciences Pub Date : 2024-06-10 Print Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1515/revneuro-2024-0016
Mariana Ferreira, Patrícia Carneiro, Vera Marisa Costa, Félix Carvalho, Andreas Meisel, João Paulo Capela
{"title":"Amphetamine and methylphenidate potential on the recovery from stroke and traumatic brain injury: a review.","authors":"Mariana Ferreira, Patrícia Carneiro, Vera Marisa Costa, Félix Carvalho, Andreas Meisel, João Paulo Capela","doi":"10.1515/revneuro-2024-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prevalence of stroke and traumatic brain injury is increasing worldwide. However, current treatments do not fully cure or stop their progression, acting mostly on symptoms. Amphetamine and methylphenidate are stimulants already approved for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and narcolepsy treatment, with neuroprotective potential and benefits when used in appropriate doses. This review aimed to summarize pre-clinical and clinical trials testing either amphetamine or methylphenidate for the treatment of stroke and traumatic brain injury. We used PubMed as a database and included the following keywords ((methylphenidate) OR (Ritalin) OR (Concerta) OR (Biphentin) OR (amphetamine) OR (Adderall)) AND ((stroke) OR (brain injury) OR (neuroplasticity)). Overall, studies provided inconsistent results regarding cognitive and motor function. Neurite outgrowth, synaptic proteins, dendritic complexity, and synaptic plasticity increases were reported in pre-clinical studies along with function improvement. Clinical trials have demonstrated that, depending on the brain region, there is an increase in motor activity, attention, and memory due to the stimulation of the functionally depressed catecholamine system and the activation of neuronal remodeling proteins. Nevertheless, more clinical trials and pre-clinical studies are needed to understand the drugs' full potential for their use in these brain diseases namely, to ascertain the treatment time window, ideal dosage, long-term effects, and mechanisms, while avoiding their addictive potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":49623,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in the Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"709-746"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2024-0016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of stroke and traumatic brain injury is increasing worldwide. However, current treatments do not fully cure or stop their progression, acting mostly on symptoms. Amphetamine and methylphenidate are stimulants already approved for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and narcolepsy treatment, with neuroprotective potential and benefits when used in appropriate doses. This review aimed to summarize pre-clinical and clinical trials testing either amphetamine or methylphenidate for the treatment of stroke and traumatic brain injury. We used PubMed as a database and included the following keywords ((methylphenidate) OR (Ritalin) OR (Concerta) OR (Biphentin) OR (amphetamine) OR (Adderall)) AND ((stroke) OR (brain injury) OR (neuroplasticity)). Overall, studies provided inconsistent results regarding cognitive and motor function. Neurite outgrowth, synaptic proteins, dendritic complexity, and synaptic plasticity increases were reported in pre-clinical studies along with function improvement. Clinical trials have demonstrated that, depending on the brain region, there is an increase in motor activity, attention, and memory due to the stimulation of the functionally depressed catecholamine system and the activation of neuronal remodeling proteins. Nevertheless, more clinical trials and pre-clinical studies are needed to understand the drugs' full potential for their use in these brain diseases namely, to ascertain the treatment time window, ideal dosage, long-term effects, and mechanisms, while avoiding their addictive potential.

安非他明和哌醋甲酯对中风和脑外伤恢复的潜力:综述。
中风和脑外伤的发病率在全球范围内呈上升趋势。然而,目前的治疗方法并不能完全治愈或阻止其发展,主要是针对症状。苯丙胺和哌醋甲酯是已被批准用于治疗注意缺陷多动障碍和嗜睡症的兴奋剂,具有神经保护潜力,在适当剂量下使用可带来益处。本综述旨在总结测试苯丙胺或哌醋甲酯治疗中风和脑外伤的临床前和临床试验。我们使用了 PubMed 作为数据库,并包含了以下关键词((哌醋甲酯)或(利他林)或(康赛达)或(比芬丁)或(苯丙胺)或(阿德拉))和((中风)或(脑损伤)或(神经可塑性))。总体而言,有关认知和运动功能的研究结果并不一致。临床前研究报告了神经元外生、突触蛋白、树突复杂性和突触可塑性的增加以及功能的改善。临床试验表明,由于刺激了功能低下的儿茶酚胺系统并激活了神经元重塑蛋白,因此不同脑区的运动活动、注意力和记忆力都会有所提高。然而,还需要进行更多的临床试验和临床前研究,以充分了解药物在这些脑部疾病中的应用潜力,即确定治疗时间窗口、理想剂量、长期效果和机制,同时避免其成瘾性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in the Neurosciences
Reviews in the Neurosciences 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in the Neurosciences provides a forum for reviews, critical evaluations and theoretical treatment of selective topics in the neurosciences. The journal is meant to provide an authoritative reference work for those interested in the structure and functions of the nervous system at all levels of analysis, including the genetic, molecular, cellular, behavioral, cognitive and clinical neurosciences. Contributions should contain a critical appraisal of specific areas and not simply a compilation of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信