Comparing Cognitive Profiles in Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis and Alzheimer Disease: More Similarities Than Differences.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200327
Laura M Hancock, Rachel Galioto, Tasha Rhoads, Daniel Ontaneda, Kunio Nakamura, Brandon Ly, Kamini Krishnan, Justin B Miller, Le H Hua
{"title":"Comparing Cognitive Profiles in Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis and Alzheimer Disease: More Similarities Than Differences.","authors":"Laura M Hancock, Rachel Galioto, Tasha Rhoads, Daniel Ontaneda, Kunio Nakamura, Brandon Ly, Kamini Krishnan, Justin B Miller, Le H Hua","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Up to 65% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience disease-related cognitive impairment, but even after decades of research, still very little is known about the cognitive issues among older adults with MS (EwMS; individuals aged 60+). To date, few studies have attempted to characterize cognitive impairment in this group or compare EwMS with those with other neurodegenerative diseases. Our goal was to address this knowledge gap by comparing EwMS with individuals experiencing cognitive impairment due to probable Alzheimer disease (AD) with biomarker confirmation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational study of individuals seen for routine clinical care at the Cleveland Clinic. After excluding for potential confounding factors, 6 groups were assembled based on the results of their clinical workup and neuropsychological examination: cognitively normal, cognitively normal with MS, mild neurocognitive disorder (due to MS or AD), and major neurocognitive disorder (due to MS or AD). These groups were compared in terms of cognitive test performance, percentage of the group impaired on specific cognitive skills, and rates of cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 140 individuals (64 EwMS and 76 demographically matched individuals from a memory clinic). Among those with mild neurocognitive disorder, differences between MS and AD were marked. However, in those with major neurocognitive disorder, these differences largely disappeared, except persistent performance differences on a measure of rote verbal memory. EwMS outperformed those with AD on memory tests at each level of cognitive impairment. EwMS also exhibited both subcortical and cortical deficits, rather than solely subcortical deficits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The overall characterization of the cognitive profile of MS may be different than once described, involving both classically cortical and subcortical functions. Clinically, our results suggest that distinguishing between the cognitive effects of MS and AD at more severe levels of cognitive impairment may be less reliable than once thought. Future work to replicate these findings in other samples and deepen the understanding of cognition in older individuals with MS is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Up to 65% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience disease-related cognitive impairment, but even after decades of research, still very little is known about the cognitive issues among older adults with MS (EwMS; individuals aged 60+). To date, few studies have attempted to characterize cognitive impairment in this group or compare EwMS with those with other neurodegenerative diseases. Our goal was to address this knowledge gap by comparing EwMS with individuals experiencing cognitive impairment due to probable Alzheimer disease (AD) with biomarker confirmation.

Methods: We conducted an observational study of individuals seen for routine clinical care at the Cleveland Clinic. After excluding for potential confounding factors, 6 groups were assembled based on the results of their clinical workup and neuropsychological examination: cognitively normal, cognitively normal with MS, mild neurocognitive disorder (due to MS or AD), and major neurocognitive disorder (due to MS or AD). These groups were compared in terms of cognitive test performance, percentage of the group impaired on specific cognitive skills, and rates of cognitive impairment.

Results: The sample comprised 140 individuals (64 EwMS and 76 demographically matched individuals from a memory clinic). Among those with mild neurocognitive disorder, differences between MS and AD were marked. However, in those with major neurocognitive disorder, these differences largely disappeared, except persistent performance differences on a measure of rote verbal memory. EwMS outperformed those with AD on memory tests at each level of cognitive impairment. EwMS also exhibited both subcortical and cortical deficits, rather than solely subcortical deficits.

Discussion: The overall characterization of the cognitive profile of MS may be different than once described, involving both classically cortical and subcortical functions. Clinically, our results suggest that distinguishing between the cognitive effects of MS and AD at more severe levels of cognitive impairment may be less reliable than once thought. Future work to replicate these findings in other samples and deepen the understanding of cognition in older individuals with MS is needed.

比较多发性硬化症和阿尔茨海默病老年人的认知概况:相似之处多于不同之处
背景和目标:高达 65% 的多发性硬化症(MS)患者会出现与疾病相关的认知障碍,但即使经过数十年的研究,人们对患有多发性硬化症的老年人(EwMS,年龄在 60 岁以上)的认知问题仍然知之甚少。迄今为止,很少有研究试图描述这一群体认知障碍的特征,或将 EwMS 与其他神经退行性疾病患者进行比较。我们的目标是通过比较 EwMS 与可能因阿尔茨海默病(AD)导致认知障碍并经生物标记物确认的患者,填补这一知识空白:我们对在克利夫兰诊所接受常规临床治疗的患者进行了一项观察性研究。在排除了潜在的混杂因素后,我们根据临床检查和神经心理学检查的结果将患者分为 6 组:认知正常组、认知正常伴多发性硬化症组、轻度神经认知障碍组(多发性硬化症或阿兹海默症所致)和重度神经认知障碍组(多发性硬化症或阿兹海默症所致)。这些组别在认知测试表现、特定认知技能受损的组别比例和认知受损率方面进行了比较:样本包括 140 名患者(64 名 EwMS 患者和 76 名来自记忆诊所的人口统计学匹配患者)。在轻度神经认知障碍患者中,多发性硬化症和注意力缺失症之间存在明显差异。然而,在患有严重神经认知障碍的患者中,这些差异已基本消失,只是在背诵记忆的测量中存在持续的表现差异。在每个认知障碍程度的记忆测试中,EwMS 的表现都优于 AD 患者。EwMS还表现出皮层下和皮层的缺陷,而不仅仅是皮层下的缺陷:讨论:多发性硬化症认知概况的总体特征可能与以往描述的不同,既涉及经典的皮层功能,也涉及皮层下功能。在临床上,我们的研究结果表明,在认知功能受损程度更严重的情况下,区分多发性硬化症和注意力缺失症对认知功能的影响可能没有以前认为的那么可靠。今后需要在其他样本中重复这些发现,并加深对老年多发性硬化症患者认知能力的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信