Comparison of facedown and non-facedown positions after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling and air tamponade for treating myopic foveoschisis with foveal detachment: A prospective, randomized interventional study
Ke Zhu , Boya Lei , Fang Song , Rui Jiang , Qing Chang , Gezhi Xu
{"title":"Comparison of facedown and non-facedown positions after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling and air tamponade for treating myopic foveoschisis with foveal detachment: A prospective, randomized interventional study","authors":"Ke Zhu , Boya Lei , Fang Song , Rui Jiang , Qing Chang , Gezhi Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes after vitrectomy with facedown (FD) or non-FD positions for treating myopic foveoschisis (MF) with foveal detachment.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective, randomized interventional study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>55 eyes with MF and foveal detachment that underwent vitrectomy with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and air tamponade were randomized to either the postoperative FD (26 eyes) or non-FD (29 eyes) positions. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing ILM peeling and air tamponade with the FD or non-FD positions. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to study correlations between clinical factors and foveoschisis resolution and postoperative BCVA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All patients completed ≥6 months of follow-up. MF and foveal detachment were completely resolved in 22 eyes (92 %) in the FD group and 22 eyes (76 %) in the non-FD group (<em>P</em> = 0.160). Macular hole-associated retinal detachment occurred in one eye in the FD (4 %) and non-FD (3 %) groups. The postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months did not differ significantly between the two groups (<em>P</em> = 0.495). The BCVA improved by ≥0.3 logMAR in 14 eyes (58 %) in the FD group versus 17 eyes (59 %) in the non-FD group (<em>P</em> = 0.983). Central foveal thickness (CFT) and height of foveal detachment were significantly associated with foveoschisis resolution (<em>P</em> = 0.045 and 0.039, respectively). Better preoperative BCVA and foveoschisis resolution were significantly associated with better postoperative BCVA (<em>P</em> = 0.031 and 0.003, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The non-FD position appeared to be as effective as the FD position after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing ILM peeling and air tamponade for treating MF with foveal detachment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100036"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000364/pdfft?md5=4287fdd4dd68809ab1887f43c8b1a98d&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000364-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes after vitrectomy with facedown (FD) or non-FD positions for treating myopic foveoschisis (MF) with foveal detachment.
Design
Prospective, randomized interventional study.
Methods
55 eyes with MF and foveal detachment that underwent vitrectomy with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and air tamponade were randomized to either the postoperative FD (26 eyes) or non-FD (29 eyes) positions. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing ILM peeling and air tamponade with the FD or non-FD positions. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to study correlations between clinical factors and foveoschisis resolution and postoperative BCVA.
Results
All patients completed ≥6 months of follow-up. MF and foveal detachment were completely resolved in 22 eyes (92 %) in the FD group and 22 eyes (76 %) in the non-FD group (P = 0.160). Macular hole-associated retinal detachment occurred in one eye in the FD (4 %) and non-FD (3 %) groups. The postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.495). The BCVA improved by ≥0.3 logMAR in 14 eyes (58 %) in the FD group versus 17 eyes (59 %) in the non-FD group (P = 0.983). Central foveal thickness (CFT) and height of foveal detachment were significantly associated with foveoschisis resolution (P = 0.045 and 0.039, respectively). Better preoperative BCVA and foveoschisis resolution were significantly associated with better postoperative BCVA (P = 0.031 and 0.003, respectively).
Conclusions
The non-FD position appeared to be as effective as the FD position after vitrectomy with fovea-sparing ILM peeling and air tamponade for treating MF with foveal detachment.