Evaluation of surface roughness and fracture resistance of maxillary conventional & digital complete dentures: An Invitro study

Eman Gamal Abdelghaffar
{"title":"Evaluation of surface roughness and fracture resistance of maxillary conventional & digital complete dentures: An Invitro study","authors":"Eman Gamal Abdelghaffar","doi":"10.21608/asdj.2024.277269.1231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: to evaluate the surface roughness and fracture resistance of complete dentures made using heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin manufactured by conventional technique & digital complete dentures manufactured by additive manufacturing technique. Materials and Methods : A total of 24 complete dentures were made (n=24), 12 dentures were made using heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin manufactured by the conventional methods. 12 dentures were designed by Exocad software program & constructed using additive manufacturing technique. Surface roughness was evaluated using optical profilometry. Fracture resistance was evaluated using universal testing machine. Data were analysed using unpaired t-test where α = 0.05. Results: There was no statistically significant difference found between the two groups when comparing the surface roughness values (P=0.5137). Conventional PMMA dentures showed mean (2.52± 0.14 µm), while 3D-printed dentures showed mean (2.59± 0.38 µm). However, regarding the fracture resistance, there was statistically significant difference found between the two groups (P<0.5), the conventional PMMA dentures showed higher mean (572.49± 13.07 N), while the digital dentures showed lesser mean with (202.51 ± 10.35 N). Conclusion : Conventional PMMA dentures and 3D-printed dentures had similar surface roughness. However conventional PMMA dentures had better fracture resistance when compared to 3D-printed dentures.","PeriodicalId":505319,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Dental Journal","volume":"73 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/asdj.2024.277269.1231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: to evaluate the surface roughness and fracture resistance of complete dentures made using heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin manufactured by conventional technique & digital complete dentures manufactured by additive manufacturing technique. Materials and Methods : A total of 24 complete dentures were made (n=24), 12 dentures were made using heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin manufactured by the conventional methods. 12 dentures were designed by Exocad software program & constructed using additive manufacturing technique. Surface roughness was evaluated using optical profilometry. Fracture resistance was evaluated using universal testing machine. Data were analysed using unpaired t-test where α = 0.05. Results: There was no statistically significant difference found between the two groups when comparing the surface roughness values (P=0.5137). Conventional PMMA dentures showed mean (2.52± 0.14 µm), while 3D-printed dentures showed mean (2.59± 0.38 µm). However, regarding the fracture resistance, there was statistically significant difference found between the two groups (P<0.5), the conventional PMMA dentures showed higher mean (572.49± 13.07 N), while the digital dentures showed lesser mean with (202.51 ± 10.35 N). Conclusion : Conventional PMMA dentures and 3D-printed dentures had similar surface roughness. However conventional PMMA dentures had better fracture resistance when compared to 3D-printed dentures.
上颌传统全口义齿和数码全口义齿表面粗糙度和抗折断性的评估:一项特邀研究
目的:评估使用传统技术制造的热固化聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)树脂和使用添加剂制造技术制造的数字化全口义齿的表面粗糙度和抗断裂性。材料与方法:共制作了 24 颗全口义齿(n=24),其中 12 颗使用传统方法制造的热固化聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)树脂。12 个假牙由 Exocad 软件程序设计,并采用快速成型技术制造。使用光学轮廓仪评估表面粗糙度。使用万能试验机对抗折性进行评估。数据采用非配对 t 检验进行分析,α = 0.05。结果:在比较表面粗糙度值时,两组之间没有发现明显的统计学差异(P=0.5137)。传统 PMMA 假牙的平均值为(2.52± 0.14 µm),而 3D 打印假牙的平均值为(2.59± 0.38 µm)。然而,在抗折强度方面,两组之间存在显著的统计学差异(P<0.5),传统 PMMA 义齿的平均值较高(572.49± 13.07 N),而三维打印义齿的平均值较低(202.51± 10.35 N)。结论:传统 PMMA 假牙和 3D 打印假牙的表面粗糙度相似。然而,与 3D 打印义齿相比,传统 PMMA 义齿具有更好的抗断裂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信