The mechanical complications and behavior of angulated dental implant abutment systems versus conventional abutments, a narrative review

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"The mechanical complications and behavior of angulated dental implant abutment systems versus conventional abutments, a narrative review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Angulated screw channel (ASC) abutment allows off-axis dental implants to be used in dental restorations without the need for cementation. As this is a relatively new system, research on its clinical performance is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To summarize the available in-vitro and in-vivo studies on the mechanical and technical issues associated with the ASC system and compare its clinical performance with that of conventional implant-supported abutments.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases was performed, focusing on articles about angulated (angled) screw channel (ASC) systems published in English between January 2015 and November 2023. Only in-vitro and in-vivo studies were included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After analyzing the recorded articles, 26 studies (11 in vivo and 15 in vitro) were included in the final discussion and review.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although the ASC system is still relatively new, and is presently outperformed by conventional abutment systems in terms of technical and mechanical properties, in short- and medium-term in-vivo studies, it was shown reliable for retaining single or multiple-unit implant restorations in both posterior and anterior zones. Still, further long-term clinical research is needed to fully elucidate the risk factors associated with ASC failures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47246,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Dental Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224001706/pdfft?md5=8e5d0784a280fb9fda061016ab200d51&pid=1-s2.0-S1013905224001706-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224001706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Angulated screw channel (ASC) abutment allows off-axis dental implants to be used in dental restorations without the need for cementation. As this is a relatively new system, research on its clinical performance is limited.

Objectives

To summarize the available in-vitro and in-vivo studies on the mechanical and technical issues associated with the ASC system and compare its clinical performance with that of conventional implant-supported abutments.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases was performed, focusing on articles about angulated (angled) screw channel (ASC) systems published in English between January 2015 and November 2023. Only in-vitro and in-vivo studies were included.

Results

After analyzing the recorded articles, 26 studies (11 in vivo and 15 in vitro) were included in the final discussion and review.

Conclusion

Although the ASC system is still relatively new, and is presently outperformed by conventional abutment systems in terms of technical and mechanical properties, in short- and medium-term in-vivo studies, it was shown reliable for retaining single or multiple-unit implant restorations in both posterior and anterior zones. Still, further long-term clinical research is needed to fully elucidate the risk factors associated with ASC failures.

角度种植体基台系统与传统基台的机械并发症和行为对比综述
背景Angulated screw channel(ASC)基台可将离轴种植体用于牙科修复,而无需粘结。目的 总结与 ASC 系统相关的机械和技术问题的现有体外和体内研究,并将其临床表现与传统的种植体支持基台进行比较。方法 在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 ScienceDirect 数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,重点检索了 2015 年 1 月至 2023 年 11 月期间用英文发表的有关成角(angled)螺旋通道(ASC)系统的文章。结果在对记录的文章进行分析后,26 项研究(11 项体内研究和 15 项体外研究)被纳入最终的讨论和综述中。结论虽然 ASC 系统仍然相对较新,而且目前在技术和机械性能方面优于传统基台系统,但在短期和中期体内研究中,它在后区和前区固位单颗或多颗种植体修复体方面被证明是可靠的。不过,还需要进一步的长期临床研究来充分阐明与 ASC 失败相关的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Saudi Dental Journal
Saudi Dental Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Dental Journal is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of dentistry. Saudi Dental Journal publishes original research and reviews on, but not limited to: • dental disease • clinical trials • dental equipment • new and experimental techniques • epidemiology and oral health • restorative dentistry • periodontology • endodontology • prosthodontics • paediatric dentistry • orthodontics and dental education Saudi Dental Journal is the official publication of the Saudi Dental Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信