The Comparison of Verb Use in Social and Science Research Article Abstract A Corpus-Based Study

Suwandi Suwandi
{"title":"The Comparison of Verb Use in Social and Science Research Article Abstract A Corpus-Based Study","authors":"Suwandi Suwandi","doi":"10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A research article is a kind of academic writing that is extensively utilized by scientists to explain their thoughts in the present day. This paper focuses on the abstract part since it is an important representation of the substance of an academic paper. This study intends to compare the verb use in abstracts of scientific and social research articles. To examine this conversation, qualitative descriptive research is performed in this study. This research investigates the frequency of the verbs identified by LancsBox 6.0 using corpus analysis. This research employs 15 scientific abstracts and 15 social abstracts produced by Indonesian authors and published between April 1st until September 30th, 2021 in order to determine the most and least commonly utilized verb types in each study. This study's objectives are to determine the types of verbs used in science and social article abstracts, to determine the frequency of verb use in science and social article abstracts, and to explain why x types of verbs are the most and y types are the least prevalent in science and social research article abstracts. Material, relational, cognitive, possessive/relational, perception/relational, feeling, existential, verbal, and corporeal are the verb kinds utilized in abstracts of scientific and social research articles, according to the study's findings. In both scientific and social abstractions, the material verb type that conveys a definite meaning is used most often. In contrast, corporeal, which expresses subjective meaning, is utilized least often in abstracts of scientific and scholarly articles. It may be argued that material verbs are most commonly utilized in academic writing that requires an objective statement as a defining property of the genre.","PeriodicalId":194212,"journal":{"name":"QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia","volume":"42 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A research article is a kind of academic writing that is extensively utilized by scientists to explain their thoughts in the present day. This paper focuses on the abstract part since it is an important representation of the substance of an academic paper. This study intends to compare the verb use in abstracts of scientific and social research articles. To examine this conversation, qualitative descriptive research is performed in this study. This research investigates the frequency of the verbs identified by LancsBox 6.0 using corpus analysis. This research employs 15 scientific abstracts and 15 social abstracts produced by Indonesian authors and published between April 1st until September 30th, 2021 in order to determine the most and least commonly utilized verb types in each study. This study's objectives are to determine the types of verbs used in science and social article abstracts, to determine the frequency of verb use in science and social article abstracts, and to explain why x types of verbs are the most and y types are the least prevalent in science and social research article abstracts. Material, relational, cognitive, possessive/relational, perception/relational, feeling, existential, verbal, and corporeal are the verb kinds utilized in abstracts of scientific and social research articles, according to the study's findings. In both scientific and social abstractions, the material verb type that conveys a definite meaning is used most often. In contrast, corporeal, which expresses subjective meaning, is utilized least often in abstracts of scientific and scholarly articles. It may be argued that material verbs are most commonly utilized in academic writing that requires an objective statement as a defining property of the genre.
社会研究与科学研究中动词使用的比较 文章摘要 基于语料库的研究
研究文章是一种学术论文,科学家们广泛使用它来阐释自己的思想。本文的重点是摘要部分,因为它是学术论文实质内容的重要体现。本研究旨在比较科学研究文章和社会研究文章摘要中动词的使用。为了考察这一对话,本研究进行了定性描述研究。本研究使用语料库分析法对 LancsBox 6.0 识别出的动词频率进行了调查。本研究采用了印尼作者在 2021 年 4 月 1 日至 9 月 30 日期间发表的 15 篇科学文摘和 15 篇社会文摘,以确定每项研究中最常用和最不常用的动词类型。本研究的目标是确定科学和社会文章摘要中使用的动词类型,确定科学和社会文章摘要中动词的使用频率,并解释为什么在科学和社会研究文章摘要中x类动词最多,y类动词最少。研究结果显示,物质、关系、认知、占有/关系、感知/关系、感觉、存在、言语和肉体是科学和社会研究文章摘要中使用的动词类型。在科学和社会研究文章的摘要中,传达明确意义的物质动词类型使用得最多。相比之下,表达主观意义的肉体动词在科学和学术文章摘要中使用得最少。可以说,在需要客观陈述作为体裁定义属性的学术写作中,物质动词是最常用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信