Characteristics and long-term mortality of individuals with MASLD, MetALD, and ALD, and the utility of SAFE score

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
{"title":"Characteristics and long-term mortality of individuals with MASLD, MetALD, and ALD, and the utility of SAFE score","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><p>The new nomenclature of steatotic liver disease (SLD) was recently launched with sub-classifications of metabolic dysfunction-associated SLD (MASLD), MASLD with increased alcohol intake (MetALD), and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD). Herein, we aimed to evaluate the characteristics and long-term outcomes associated with these subgroups and the utility of non-invasive biomarkers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using NHANES III (the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) and linked mortality data, all adult participants with available ultrasonographic liver steatosis status were included. Those with viral hepatitis, incomplete data on alcohol consumption, cardiometabolic risk, and missing data that hindered Steatosis-associated Fibrosis Estimator (SAFE) score calculation were excluded. The characteristics of those without SLD (no steatosis on ultrasound), MASLD, MetALD, and ALD were compared. Overall survival (OS) was determined and SAFE score strata were applied to SLD subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 9,939 participants were eligible; 64% had no SLD, while 30%, 2.3%, and 1% had MASLD, MetALD, and ALD, respectively. A higher proportion of men, as well as active smokers, was observed in the MetALD and ALD groups compared to the MASLD group. Diabetes was more prevalent in the MASLD group than in the MetALD and ALD groups. The ALD subgroup had significantly lower OS than the MASLD group (<em>p</em> = 0.004), but the MetALD did not (<em>p</em> = 0.165). SAFE score strata meaningfully differentiated OS of all SLD subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MASLD accounted for the largest proportion of SLD. MetALD shared the characteristics of both MASLD and ALD. The ALD subgroup had a significantly lower OS than the MASLD subgroup but there was no difference between MetALD and MASLD. The SAFE score can be used to stratify long-term outcomes in all SLD subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Impact and implications:</h3><p>“Steatotic liver disease (SLD)” is a recently introduced term covering three subgroups: MASLD (metabolic dysfunction-associated SLD), MetALD (MASLD with increased alcohol intake), and ALD (alcohol-related liver disease). We explored the characteristics and outcomes of these subgroups among the US population. We found that MASLD was far more common than MetALD and ALD, but all subgroups shared cardiometabolic risk factors. The ALD subgroup has the worst survival, pointing to the synergistic effect of alcohol and metabolic dysfunction. In addition, the SAFE (Steatosis-associated Fibrosis Estimator) score might be a useful non-invasive test to stratify long-term risk in all three SLD subgroups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14764,"journal":{"name":"JHEP Reports","volume":"6 10","pages":"Article 101127"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555924001319/pdfft?md5=70fb5f648622f96dd3f315e9fc75d05b&pid=1-s2.0-S2589555924001319-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHEP Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555924001319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims

The new nomenclature of steatotic liver disease (SLD) was recently launched with sub-classifications of metabolic dysfunction-associated SLD (MASLD), MASLD with increased alcohol intake (MetALD), and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD). Herein, we aimed to evaluate the characteristics and long-term outcomes associated with these subgroups and the utility of non-invasive biomarkers.

Methods

Using NHANES III (the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) and linked mortality data, all adult participants with available ultrasonographic liver steatosis status were included. Those with viral hepatitis, incomplete data on alcohol consumption, cardiometabolic risk, and missing data that hindered Steatosis-associated Fibrosis Estimator (SAFE) score calculation were excluded. The characteristics of those without SLD (no steatosis on ultrasound), MASLD, MetALD, and ALD were compared. Overall survival (OS) was determined and SAFE score strata were applied to SLD subgroups.

Results

A total of 9,939 participants were eligible; 64% had no SLD, while 30%, 2.3%, and 1% had MASLD, MetALD, and ALD, respectively. A higher proportion of men, as well as active smokers, was observed in the MetALD and ALD groups compared to the MASLD group. Diabetes was more prevalent in the MASLD group than in the MetALD and ALD groups. The ALD subgroup had significantly lower OS than the MASLD group (p = 0.004), but the MetALD did not (p = 0.165). SAFE score strata meaningfully differentiated OS of all SLD subgroups.

Conclusions

MASLD accounted for the largest proportion of SLD. MetALD shared the characteristics of both MASLD and ALD. The ALD subgroup had a significantly lower OS than the MASLD subgroup but there was no difference between MetALD and MASLD. The SAFE score can be used to stratify long-term outcomes in all SLD subgroups.

Impact and implications:

“Steatotic liver disease (SLD)” is a recently introduced term covering three subgroups: MASLD (metabolic dysfunction-associated SLD), MetALD (MASLD with increased alcohol intake), and ALD (alcohol-related liver disease). We explored the characteristics and outcomes of these subgroups among the US population. We found that MASLD was far more common than MetALD and ALD, but all subgroups shared cardiometabolic risk factors. The ALD subgroup has the worst survival, pointing to the synergistic effect of alcohol and metabolic dysfunction. In addition, the SAFE (Steatosis-associated Fibrosis Estimator) score might be a useful non-invasive test to stratify long-term risk in all three SLD subgroups.

Abstract Image

MASLD、MetALD 和 ALD 患者的特征和长期死亡率以及 SAFE 评分的实用性
背景& 目的最近推出了脂肪性肝病(SLD)的新命名方法,其中包括代谢功能障碍相关SLD(MASLD)、酒精摄入增加相关SLD(MetALD)和酒精相关肝病(ALD)等亚类。在此,我们旨在评估与这些亚组相关的特征和长期预后,以及非侵入性生物标志物的效用。方法利用 NHANES III(第三次全国健康与营养调查)和相关死亡率数据,纳入所有具有可用超声肝脏脂肪变性状态的成年参与者。排除了那些患有病毒性肝炎、饮酒数据不完整、心血管代谢风险以及数据缺失而影响脂肪变性相关纤维化估算器(SAFE)评分计算的人群。比较了无 SLD(超声检查无脂肪变性)、MASLD、MetALD 和 ALD 患者的特征。结果 共有9939名参与者符合条件,其中64%无SLD,MASLD、MetALD和ALD分别占30%、2.3%和1%。与 MASLD 组相比,MetALD 和 ALD 组中男性比例更高,吸烟者也更活跃。MASLD组的糖尿病发病率高于MetALD组和ALD组。ALD亚组的OS明显低于MASLD组(p = 0.004),但MetALD组则没有(p = 0.165)。SAFE评分分层有意义地区分了所有SLD亚组的OS。MetALD具有MASLD和ALD的共同特征。ALD亚组的OS明显低于MASLD亚组,但MetALD和MASLD之间没有差异。SAFE评分可用于对所有SLD亚组的长期预后进行分层。影响和意义:"脂肪肝(SLD)"是最近引入的一个术语,涵盖三个亚组:影响:"脂肪性肝病(SLD)"是最近引入的一个术语,涵盖三个亚组:MASLD(代谢功能障碍相关性 SLD)、MetALD(酒精摄入增加的 MASLD)和 ALD(酒精相关性肝病)。我们探讨了美国人群中这些亚组的特征和结果。我们发现,MASLD 比 MetALD 和 ALD 更为常见,但所有亚组都有共同的心脏代谢风险因素。ALD 亚组的存活率最差,这表明酒精和代谢功能障碍具有协同作用。此外,SAFE(脂肪变性相关纤维化估计器)评分可能是一种有用的无创检测方法,可对所有三个 SLD 亚组的长期风险进行分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JHEP Reports
JHEP Reports GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
161
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: JHEP Reports is an open access journal that is affiliated with the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). It serves as a companion journal to the highly respected Journal of Hepatology. The primary objective of JHEP Reports is to publish original papers and reviews that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of liver diseases. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including basic, translational, and clinical research. It also focuses on global issues in hepatology, with particular emphasis on areas such as clinical trials, novel diagnostics, precision medicine and therapeutics, cancer research, cellular and molecular studies, artificial intelligence, microbiome research, epidemiology, and cutting-edge technologies. In summary, JHEP Reports is dedicated to promoting scientific discoveries and innovations in liver diseases through the publication of high-quality research papers and reviews covering various aspects of hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信