Attuned to the Flux of Life: Relations Between Ability Emotional Intelligence and Emotional Reactivity

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Michael D. Robinson, Roberta L. Irvin, Michelle R. Persich Durham
{"title":"Attuned to the Flux of Life: Relations Between Ability Emotional Intelligence and Emotional Reactivity","authors":"Michael D. Robinson,&nbsp;Roberta L. Irvin,&nbsp;Michelle R. Persich Durham","doi":"10.1007/s42761-024-00241-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The field of ability-related emotional intelligence (ability EI) could benefit from new perspectives concerning dynamic operations. According to a recent perspective, variations in ability EI are likely to be linked to variations in skills related to evaluation. This perspective contends, perhaps counterintuitively, that higher levels of ability EI are likely to be linked to higher levels of emotional reactivity, defined in terms of stronger event-emotion relationships. Two studies (total <i>N</i> = 245) pursue such ideas in the context of multilevel models involving event valence and emotional experience. Variations in ability EI modulated event-emotion relationships in the context of laboratory inductions involving hypothetical events (Study 1), affective images varying in valence (Study 1), and with respect to naturally occurring variations in positive and negative daily events (Study 2), such that higher levels of ability EI were linked to stronger event-emotion relationships, regardless of whether events and emotions were positive or negative in valence. These results provide new evidence for recent theorizing concerning ability EI while speaking to functional versus dysfunctional perspectives on emotional reactivity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"5 2","pages":"115 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-024-00241-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The field of ability-related emotional intelligence (ability EI) could benefit from new perspectives concerning dynamic operations. According to a recent perspective, variations in ability EI are likely to be linked to variations in skills related to evaluation. This perspective contends, perhaps counterintuitively, that higher levels of ability EI are likely to be linked to higher levels of emotional reactivity, defined in terms of stronger event-emotion relationships. Two studies (total N = 245) pursue such ideas in the context of multilevel models involving event valence and emotional experience. Variations in ability EI modulated event-emotion relationships in the context of laboratory inductions involving hypothetical events (Study 1), affective images varying in valence (Study 1), and with respect to naturally occurring variations in positive and negative daily events (Study 2), such that higher levels of ability EI were linked to stronger event-emotion relationships, regardless of whether events and emotions were positive or negative in valence. These results provide new evidence for recent theorizing concerning ability EI while speaking to functional versus dysfunctional perspectives on emotional reactivity.

Abstract Image

适应生活的变化:能力情商与情绪反应之间的关系
与能力相关的情商(ability EI)领域可以从有关动态操作的新视角中获益。根据最近的一种观点,能力情商的变化很可能与评价技能的变化有关。这种观点认为(也许是反直觉的),较高水平的能力情感指数可能与较高水平的情感反应性有关,情感反应性的定义是事件与情感之间更强的关系。有两项研究(总人数= 245)在涉及事件价值和情绪体验的多层次模型中探讨了这一观点。在涉及假定事件的实验室诱导(研究 1)、情绪价位变化的情感图像(研究 1)以及自然发生的积极和消极日常事件变化(研究 2)的背景下,能力 EI 的变化调节了事件-情感关系,因此,无论事件和情绪的价位是积极还是消极,较高水平的能力 EI 都与较强的事件-情感关系相关联。这些结果为近期有关能力情感指数的理论研究提供了新的证据,同时也说明了情绪反应性的功能性与功能障碍观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信