Pregabalin as Alternative to Epidural Blood Patch in Treatment of Postdural Puncture Headache: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

N. Abo-Elmaety, Neveen A. Kohaf, Hany Bauiomy, Ahmed M. Abosakaya
{"title":"Pregabalin as Alternative to Epidural Blood Patch in Treatment of Postdural Puncture Headache: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial","authors":"N. Abo-Elmaety, Neveen A. Kohaf, Hany Bauiomy, Ahmed M. Abosakaya","doi":"10.21608/bmfj.2024.240523.1912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) commonly arises following a lumbar puncture. It is typically managed through conservative measures or an epidural blood patch (EBP), but each has limitations. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pregabalin versus EBP in the management of PDPH. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 75 cases with confirmed diagnosis of PDPH. Patients were equally randomized into three groups: Group A (pregabalin group) received oral pregabalin treatment administered at 150 mg daily, with 75 mg given every 12 hours. Group B (EBP group) received EBP and Group C (control group) received conservative treatment. Results: Complete relief of headache was experienced by 13 (52%) patients in group A, 18 (72%) patients in group B, and 5 (20%) patients in group C, with significant distinctions observed among the examined groups (P<0.001). The VAS scores, severity of headache, and frequency of attacks demonstrated a significant improvement at 12h, 24h,36h, and 48h post-treatment within all groups A, B, and C (P<0.001) compared to baseline. Group A was comparable at most time points during follow-up with EBP and better than conservative treatment in terms of VAS scores, severity of headache and frequency of attacks. Conclusions: Pregabalin was comparable at most time points during follow-up with EBP and better than conservative treatment in terms of pain, impact on daily activities and frequency of attacks. Being a non-invasive route, oral pregabalin showed lower back pain than EBP, making it a promising drug for the management of PDPH.","PeriodicalId":503219,"journal":{"name":"Benha Medical Journal","volume":"50 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2024.240523.1912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) commonly arises following a lumbar puncture. It is typically managed through conservative measures or an epidural blood patch (EBP), but each has limitations. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pregabalin versus EBP in the management of PDPH. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 75 cases with confirmed diagnosis of PDPH. Patients were equally randomized into three groups: Group A (pregabalin group) received oral pregabalin treatment administered at 150 mg daily, with 75 mg given every 12 hours. Group B (EBP group) received EBP and Group C (control group) received conservative treatment. Results: Complete relief of headache was experienced by 13 (52%) patients in group A, 18 (72%) patients in group B, and 5 (20%) patients in group C, with significant distinctions observed among the examined groups (P<0.001). The VAS scores, severity of headache, and frequency of attacks demonstrated a significant improvement at 12h, 24h,36h, and 48h post-treatment within all groups A, B, and C (P<0.001) compared to baseline. Group A was comparable at most time points during follow-up with EBP and better than conservative treatment in terms of VAS scores, severity of headache and frequency of attacks. Conclusions: Pregabalin was comparable at most time points during follow-up with EBP and better than conservative treatment in terms of pain, impact on daily activities and frequency of attacks. Being a non-invasive route, oral pregabalin showed lower back pain than EBP, making it a promising drug for the management of PDPH.
普瑞巴林替代硬膜外血贴治疗硬膜穿刺后头痛:随机对照临床试验
:背景:硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)常见于腰椎穿刺术后。通常采取保守治疗或硬膜外充血贴片(EBP)治疗,但这两种方法都有局限性。本试验旨在比较普瑞巴林与 EBP 在治疗 PDPH 方面的疗效和安全性。方法:这项随机对照试验针对 75 例确诊为 PDPH 的患者。患者被平均随机分为三组:A组(普瑞巴林组)接受普瑞巴林口服治疗,每天150毫克,每12小时75毫克。B组(EBP组)接受EBP治疗,C组(对照组)接受保守治疗。治疗结果A 组有 13 名患者(52%)、B 组有 18 名患者(72%)、C 组有 5 名患者(20%)的头痛症状得到完全缓解,各组间差异显著(P<0.001)。与基线相比,A、B 和 C 组患者在治疗后 12 小时、24 小时、36 小时和 48 小时的 VAS 评分、头痛严重程度和发作频率均有显著改善(P<0.001)。在随访期间的大多数时间点上,A 组与 EBP 相比较,在 VAS 评分、头痛严重程度和发作频率方面均优于保守疗法。结论普瑞巴林在随访期间的大多数时间点与 EBP 相当,在疼痛、对日常活动的影响和发作频率方面优于保守疗法。作为一种非侵入性途径,口服普瑞巴林的背痛程度低于 EBP,使其成为治疗 PDPH 的一种有前途的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信