Hamza Ghazzal, Yousef Omar, Dunia Jaber, Rahaf Melhem, Ibrahim Alzoraiqi, Ahmad Toubasi, Heba Kalbouneh
{"title":"Jordanian medical students’ perspective on the impact of a Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1: A Cross-Sectional Investigation","authors":"Hamza Ghazzal, Yousef Omar, Dunia Jaber, Rahaf Melhem, Ibrahim Alzoraiqi, Ahmad Toubasi, Heba Kalbouneh","doi":"10.58877/japaj.v2i2.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of the study: to discuss Jordanian medical students’ perspective on USMLE step 1 pass/fail score and its impact on their clinical future. \nStudy Design: This cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students at all six schools of medicine in Jordan. An online self-administered questionnaire was used, consisting of 33 questions assessing the participants’ socio-demographics, socio-academics, intentions to apply for the USMLE step 1 examination and their attitudes toward the conversion of USMLE step 1 to pass/fail scoring system. \nResults: A total number of 504 medical students completed the survey. Among participating students, 44.4% agreed that USMLE should be pass/fail, while only 26.8% were against it. Furthermore, 82.3% of the students agreed that by this change, Step 2 CK will carry more weight in selecting applicants for residency. Moreover, 86.7% of respondents believed that more students will participate in research activities which were ranked as the second most important item for residency matching. \nConclusion: Converting USMLE step 1 scoring system to a pass/fail score will likely increase the weight of Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score as well as on the research experience for selecting applicants for residency.","PeriodicalId":475318,"journal":{"name":"JAP Academy Journal","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAP Academy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58877/japaj.v2i2.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of the study: to discuss Jordanian medical students’ perspective on USMLE step 1 pass/fail score and its impact on their clinical future.
Study Design: This cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students at all six schools of medicine in Jordan. An online self-administered questionnaire was used, consisting of 33 questions assessing the participants’ socio-demographics, socio-academics, intentions to apply for the USMLE step 1 examination and their attitudes toward the conversion of USMLE step 1 to pass/fail scoring system.
Results: A total number of 504 medical students completed the survey. Among participating students, 44.4% agreed that USMLE should be pass/fail, while only 26.8% were against it. Furthermore, 82.3% of the students agreed that by this change, Step 2 CK will carry more weight in selecting applicants for residency. Moreover, 86.7% of respondents believed that more students will participate in research activities which were ranked as the second most important item for residency matching.
Conclusion: Converting USMLE step 1 scoring system to a pass/fail score will likely increase the weight of Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score as well as on the research experience for selecting applicants for residency.