Jordanian medical students’ perspective on the impact of a Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1: A Cross-Sectional Investigation

Hamza Ghazzal, Yousef Omar, Dunia Jaber, Rahaf Melhem, Ibrahim Alzoraiqi, Ahmad Toubasi, Heba Kalbouneh
{"title":"Jordanian medical students’ perspective on the impact of a Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1: A Cross-Sectional Investigation","authors":"Hamza Ghazzal, Yousef Omar, Dunia Jaber, Rahaf Melhem, Ibrahim Alzoraiqi, Ahmad Toubasi, Heba Kalbouneh","doi":"10.58877/japaj.v2i2.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of the study: to discuss Jordanian medical students’ perspective on USMLE step 1 pass/fail score and its impact on their clinical future. \nStudy Design: This cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students at all six schools of medicine in Jordan. An online self-administered questionnaire was used, consisting of 33 questions assessing the participants’ socio-demographics, socio-academics, intentions to apply for the USMLE step 1 examination and their attitudes toward the conversion of USMLE step 1 to pass/fail scoring system. \nResults: A total number of 504 medical students completed the survey. Among participating students, 44.4% agreed that USMLE should be pass/fail, while only 26.8% were against it. Furthermore, 82.3% of the students agreed that by this change, Step 2 CK will carry more weight in selecting applicants for residency. Moreover, 86.7% of respondents believed that more students will participate in research activities which were ranked as the second most important item for residency matching. \nConclusion: Converting USMLE step 1 scoring system to a pass/fail score will likely increase the weight of Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score as well as on the research experience for selecting applicants for residency.","PeriodicalId":475318,"journal":{"name":"JAP Academy Journal","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAP Academy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58877/japaj.v2i2.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: to discuss Jordanian medical students’ perspective on USMLE step 1 pass/fail score and its impact on their clinical future. Study Design: This cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students at all six schools of medicine in Jordan. An online self-administered questionnaire was used, consisting of 33 questions assessing the participants’ socio-demographics, socio-academics, intentions to apply for the USMLE step 1 examination and their attitudes toward the conversion of USMLE step 1 to pass/fail scoring system. Results: A total number of 504 medical students completed the survey. Among participating students, 44.4% agreed that USMLE should be pass/fail, while only 26.8% were against it. Furthermore, 82.3% of the students agreed that by this change, Step 2 CK will carry more weight in selecting applicants for residency. Moreover, 86.7% of respondents believed that more students will participate in research activities which were ranked as the second most important item for residency matching. Conclusion: Converting USMLE step 1 scoring system to a pass/fail score will likely increase the weight of Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score as well as on the research experience for selecting applicants for residency.
约旦医科学生对 USMLE 第 1 步考试及格/不及格的影响的看法:横断面调查
研究目的:讨论约旦医科学生对 USMLE 第 1 步通过/未通过分数的看法及其对临床未来的影响。研究设计:这项横断面研究的对象是约旦所有六所医学院的医科学生。研究采用了在线自填问卷的方式,其中包括 33 个问题,评估参与者的社会人口学、社会学术、申请 USMLE 第 1 步考试的意向以及他们对 USMLE 第 1 步转为通过/未通过评分系统的态度。研究结果共有 504 名医学生完成了调查。在参与调查的学生中,44.4% 的人同意 USMLE 应采用及格/不及格计分法,只有 26.8% 的人反对。此外,82.3% 的学生同意,通过这一改革,步骤 2 CK 将在选择住院医师申请人时占据更大的权重。此外,86.7% 的受访者认为会有更多学生参与研究活动,而研究活动被列为住院医师配对的第二重要项目。结论将 USMLE 第 1 步评分系统转换为通过/未通过评分,可能会增加第 2 步临床知识(CK)分数以及研究经历在选择住院医师申请人时的权重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信