Exploring client-therapist relationships through joint interviews

Marie Strand Skånland, Gisle Fuhr
{"title":"Exploring client-therapist relationships through joint interviews","authors":"Marie Strand Skånland, Gisle Fuhr","doi":"10.1177/14687941241255245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few years, there has been an increase of literature on the use of interviews with two participants, otherwise known as joint interviews. Researchers who employ this methodology describe challenges and potential advantages inherent to this approach, distinguishing it from individual and group interviews. In this article, we present and discuss results from two studies on therapeutic relationships in music therapy that include joint interviews with clients and their music therapists. Combining the data from the two studies, we identify and reflect on how the method of data collection shaped the interview situations and the findings that can be drawn from the empirical material. We found that the joint interview setting offered safety and support for the clients. Further, the joint interview setting allowed the music therapists and clients to address each other, build on each other's statements, and develop and negotiate shared understandings. Specifically, in joint interviews, as opposed to separate interviews, interactions within the dyad can be observed. This observation offers valuable information about the relationship within the dyad. The therapeutic relationship is key to therapeutic effect, but the client and therapist have been found to perceive their relationship differently. It is, therefore, essential to include both client and therapist when researching their relationship, and we argue that the joint interview holds a specific potential of producing rich data.","PeriodicalId":509994,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research","volume":"7 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241255245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the last few years, there has been an increase of literature on the use of interviews with two participants, otherwise known as joint interviews. Researchers who employ this methodology describe challenges and potential advantages inherent to this approach, distinguishing it from individual and group interviews. In this article, we present and discuss results from two studies on therapeutic relationships in music therapy that include joint interviews with clients and their music therapists. Combining the data from the two studies, we identify and reflect on how the method of data collection shaped the interview situations and the findings that can be drawn from the empirical material. We found that the joint interview setting offered safety and support for the clients. Further, the joint interview setting allowed the music therapists and clients to address each other, build on each other's statements, and develop and negotiate shared understandings. Specifically, in joint interviews, as opposed to separate interviews, interactions within the dyad can be observed. This observation offers valuable information about the relationship within the dyad. The therapeutic relationship is key to therapeutic effect, but the client and therapist have been found to perceive their relationship differently. It is, therefore, essential to include both client and therapist when researching their relationship, and we argue that the joint interview holds a specific potential of producing rich data.
通过联合访谈探索客户与治疗师之间的关系
在过去几年中,关于使用有两名参与者的访谈(又称联合访谈)的文献越来越多。采用这种方法的研究人员描述了这种方法固有的挑战和潜在优势,并将其与个别访谈和小组访谈区分开来。在本文中,我们介绍并讨论了两项关于音乐治疗中治疗关系的研究结果,其中包括对客户及其音乐治疗师的联合访谈。结合这两项研究的数据,我们确定并反思了数据收集方法是如何塑造访谈情境以及从实证材料中得出结论的。我们发现,联合访谈为客户提供了安全和支持。此外,联合访谈的环境允许音乐治疗师和客户相互交流,在彼此陈述的基础上发展和协商共同的理解。具体来说,在联合访谈中,与单独访谈相比,可以观察到二人组内部的互动。这种观察可以提供有关二人关系的宝贵信息。治疗关系是治疗效果的关键,但研究发现,求助者和治疗师对他们之间的关系有不同的看法。因此,在研究求助者和治疗师的关系时,必须将他们都包括在内,我们认为联合访谈具有产生丰富数据的特定潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信