On the problem of improving methods for recruiting potential bone marrow donors in the Russian population

F. F. Ishkineeva, Zhanna V. Saveleva, O. Gerova, Liliia M. Fakhretdinova, Raushaniia Gaifullina
{"title":"On the problem of improving methods for recruiting potential bone marrow donors in the Russian population","authors":"F. F. Ishkineeva, Zhanna V. Saveleva, O. Gerova, Liliia M. Fakhretdinova, Raushaniia Gaifullina","doi":"10.17816/kmj633026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: To achieve the number of potential bone marrow donors in Russian registries to a level sufficient for effective selection of recipients in need of transplantation, it is important to find the most effective ways to recruit Russians as potential bone marrow donors. \nAIM: To identify areas for improving methods of recruiting potential bone marrow donors in the Russian population. \nMATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic survey was conducted: the questionnaire included 27 questions, the respondents were participants in the register of potential bone marrow donors of the Vasya Perevoshchikov National Register of Bone Marrow Donors Charitable Foundation, expert validation and a preliminary pilot survey were used. The focus was on factors that determine the population’s readiness to donate, preferred methods of donating biomaterial and territorial accessibility of recruitment centers, opportunities and obstacles to recruiting bone marrow donors. 6,314 people took part in the survey. The work used frequency analysis methods and the Pearson χ2 statistical criterion; the data was processed in the SPSS Statistics program. \nRESULTS: The most common channels of information about bone marrow donation in the process of involving potential registry participants were mass media (33.6%), social media (18.9%) and the social environment (18.4%). Among the respondents, 30% had experience in human blood donation. The social environment of donors included people who had experience in donating blood: among those surveyed, 48.5% indicated that their relatives served as blood donors; 67.7% noted that their friends were blood donors. For 40% of the registry participants, the method of submitting biospecimens was important. The majority (87%) of respondents indicated that submitting biospecimens at medical centers was the most convenient mechanism for joining the registry. \nCONCLUSION: The media serve as an effective channel for informing the population; the role of new social media (Internet resources, social networks) is increasing. A significant factor in involvement in the register is the social environment, including people who have experience in donating blood.","PeriodicalId":17750,"journal":{"name":"Kazan medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kazan medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/kmj633026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To achieve the number of potential bone marrow donors in Russian registries to a level sufficient for effective selection of recipients in need of transplantation, it is important to find the most effective ways to recruit Russians as potential bone marrow donors. AIM: To identify areas for improving methods of recruiting potential bone marrow donors in the Russian population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic survey was conducted: the questionnaire included 27 questions, the respondents were participants in the register of potential bone marrow donors of the Vasya Perevoshchikov National Register of Bone Marrow Donors Charitable Foundation, expert validation and a preliminary pilot survey were used. The focus was on factors that determine the population’s readiness to donate, preferred methods of donating biomaterial and territorial accessibility of recruitment centers, opportunities and obstacles to recruiting bone marrow donors. 6,314 people took part in the survey. The work used frequency analysis methods and the Pearson χ2 statistical criterion; the data was processed in the SPSS Statistics program. RESULTS: The most common channels of information about bone marrow donation in the process of involving potential registry participants were mass media (33.6%), social media (18.9%) and the social environment (18.4%). Among the respondents, 30% had experience in human blood donation. The social environment of donors included people who had experience in donating blood: among those surveyed, 48.5% indicated that their relatives served as blood donors; 67.7% noted that their friends were blood donors. For 40% of the registry participants, the method of submitting biospecimens was important. The majority (87%) of respondents indicated that submitting biospecimens at medical centers was the most convenient mechanism for joining the registry. CONCLUSION: The media serve as an effective channel for informing the population; the role of new social media (Internet resources, social networks) is increasing. A significant factor in involvement in the register is the social environment, including people who have experience in donating blood.
关于改进在俄罗斯人口中招募潜在骨髓捐献者方法的问题
背景:为了使俄罗斯登记册中的潜在骨髓捐献者人数达到足以有效选择需要移植的受者的水平,必须找到最有效的方法来招募俄罗斯人作为潜在的骨髓捐献者。目的:确定在俄罗斯人口中招募潜在骨髓捐献者的方法需要改进的领域。材料与方法:进行了一项电子调查:问卷包括 27 个问题,受访者为 Vasya Perevoshchikov 国家骨髓捐献者慈善基金会潜在骨髓捐献者登记册的参与者,采用了专家验证和初步试点调查。调查的重点是决定居民捐献意愿的因素、捐献生物材料的首选方法、招募中心的地域可达性、招募骨髓捐献者的机会和障碍。6314 人参加了调查。工作中使用了频率分析方法和皮尔逊 χ2 统计标准;数据在 SPSS 统计程序中进行了处理。结果:在潜在登记参与者的参与过程中,最常见的骨髓捐献信息渠道是大众媒体(33.6%)、社交媒体(18.9%)和社会环境(18.4%)。在受访者中,30%的人有人类献血经验。献血者的社会环境包括有献血经历的人:在受访者中,48.5% 的人表示他们的亲戚是献血者;67.7% 的人表示他们的朋友是献血者。对于 40% 的登记册参与者来说,提交生物样本的方法很重要。大多数受访者(87%)表示,在医疗中心提交生物样本是加入登记处最方便的机制。结论:媒体是向公众提供信息的有效渠道;新的社交媒体(互联网资源、社交网络)的作用正在不断增强。参与登记的一个重要因素是社会环境,包括有献血经验的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信