Applications of Brain Wave Classification for Controlling an Intelligent Wheelchair

Maria Carolina Avelar, Patricia Almeida, Brígida Mónica Faria, Luís Paulo Reis
{"title":"Applications of Brain Wave Classification for Controlling an Intelligent Wheelchair","authors":"Maria Carolina Avelar, Patricia Almeida, Brígida Mónica Faria, Luís Paulo Reis","doi":"10.3390/technologies12060080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The independence and autonomy of both elderly and disabled people have been a growing concern in today’s society. Therefore, wheelchairs have proven to be fundamental for the movement of these people with physical disabilities in the lower limbs, paralysis, or other type of restrictive diseases. Various adapted sensors can be employed in order to facilitate the wheelchair’s driving experience. This work develops the proof concept of a brain–computer interface (BCI), whose ultimate final goal will be to control an intelligent wheelchair. An event-related (de)synchronization neuro-mechanism will be used, since it corresponds to a synchronization, or desynchronization, in the mu and beta brain rhythms, during the execution, preparation, or imagination of motor actions. Two datasets were used for algorithm development: one from the IV competition of BCIs (A), acquired through twenty-two Ag/AgCl electrodes and encompassing motor imagery of the right and left hands, and feet; and the other (B) was obtained in the laboratory using an Emotiv EPOC headset, also with the same motor imaginary. Regarding feature extraction, several approaches were tested: namely, two versions of the signal’s power spectral density, followed by a filter bank version; the use of respective frequency coefficients; and, finally, two versions of the known method filter bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP). Concerning the results from the second version of FBCSP, dataset A presented an F1-score of 0.797 and a rather low false positive rate of 0.150. Moreover, the correspondent average kappa score reached the value of 0.693, which is in the same order of magnitude as 0.57, obtained by the competition. Regarding dataset B, the average value of the F1-score was 0.651, followed by a kappa score of 0.447, and a false positive rate of 0.471. However, it should be noted that some subjects from this dataset presented F1-scores of 0.747 and 0.911, suggesting that the movement imagery (MI) aptness of different users may influence their performance. In conclusion, it is possible to obtain promising results, using an architecture for a real-time application.","PeriodicalId":504839,"journal":{"name":"Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12060080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The independence and autonomy of both elderly and disabled people have been a growing concern in today’s society. Therefore, wheelchairs have proven to be fundamental for the movement of these people with physical disabilities in the lower limbs, paralysis, or other type of restrictive diseases. Various adapted sensors can be employed in order to facilitate the wheelchair’s driving experience. This work develops the proof concept of a brain–computer interface (BCI), whose ultimate final goal will be to control an intelligent wheelchair. An event-related (de)synchronization neuro-mechanism will be used, since it corresponds to a synchronization, or desynchronization, in the mu and beta brain rhythms, during the execution, preparation, or imagination of motor actions. Two datasets were used for algorithm development: one from the IV competition of BCIs (A), acquired through twenty-two Ag/AgCl electrodes and encompassing motor imagery of the right and left hands, and feet; and the other (B) was obtained in the laboratory using an Emotiv EPOC headset, also with the same motor imaginary. Regarding feature extraction, several approaches were tested: namely, two versions of the signal’s power spectral density, followed by a filter bank version; the use of respective frequency coefficients; and, finally, two versions of the known method filter bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP). Concerning the results from the second version of FBCSP, dataset A presented an F1-score of 0.797 and a rather low false positive rate of 0.150. Moreover, the correspondent average kappa score reached the value of 0.693, which is in the same order of magnitude as 0.57, obtained by the competition. Regarding dataset B, the average value of the F1-score was 0.651, followed by a kappa score of 0.447, and a false positive rate of 0.471. However, it should be noted that some subjects from this dataset presented F1-scores of 0.747 and 0.911, suggesting that the movement imagery (MI) aptness of different users may influence their performance. In conclusion, it is possible to obtain promising results, using an architecture for a real-time application.
脑电波分类在控制智能轮椅中的应用
当今社会,老年人和残疾人的独立性和自主性日益受到关注。因此,轮椅已被证明是下肢残疾、瘫痪或其他类型限制性疾病患者行动的基本工具。为了促进轮椅的驾驶体验,可以采用各种适配传感器。这项研究开发了脑机接口(BCI)的验证概念,其最终目标是控制智能轮椅。将使用事件相关(去)同步神经机制,因为它对应于在执行、准备或想象运动动作时,大脑μ和β节律的同步或非同步。算法开发使用了两个数据集:一个数据集来自第四届 BCIs 比赛(A),通过 22 个 Ag/AgCl 电极获得,包含左右手和脚的运动想象;另一个数据集(B)是在实验室使用 Emotiv EPOC 头戴式耳机获得的,也包含相同的运动想象。在特征提取方面,对几种方法进行了测试:即信号功率谱密度的两个版本,然后是滤波器组版本;使用各自的频率系数;最后是已知方法滤波器组共同空间模式(FBCSP)的两个版本。关于第二版 FBCSP 的结果,数据集 A 的 F1 分数为 0.797,误报率为 0.150,相当低。此外,相应的平均 kappa 分数达到了 0.693,与竞赛中获得的 0.57 处于同一数量级。数据集 B 的 F1 分数平均值为 0.651,kappa 分数为 0.447,误报率为 0.471。不过,值得注意的是,该数据集中的一些受试者的 F1 分数达到了 0.747 和 0.911,这表明不同用户的运动图像(MI)能力可能会影响他们的表现。总之,使用实时应用架构可以获得令人满意的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信