Bank Customer Churn Prediction Using Machine Learning Framework

Rasha Ashraf
{"title":"Bank Customer Churn Prediction Using Machine Learning Framework","authors":"Rasha Ashraf","doi":"10.47260/jafb/1445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n\nUsing real customer data from a large community bank in the South of the US, this paper analyzes the customer churn prediction problem by constructing and comparing ten machine learning classification models with five sample techniques. Our results show that Random Forest, XG Boost, AdaBoost, and Bagging Meta classifiers dominate others in terms of overall accuracy, F-score, and AUC curve for the test observations. For the four classifiers, the overall accuracy ranges from 87% to 96% across five different sampling methods explored, while the AUC values range between 0.9 to 0.93. Considering overall accuracy and F-Score, AdaBoost with original and MTDF sampling technique dominates others; however, considering the AUC measure, XG Boost and Random Forest perform similarly to AdaBoost, which slightly dominate Bagging Meta across all sampling techniques; although the performance measures for these four classifiers are comparable across all sampling techniques. The paper further presents important features of customer churn behavior as predicted by the model. The diagnostic analysis also provides an insightful comparison between churned and non-churned customers.\n\nJEL classification numbers: C0, C5, C8, G21.\nKeywords: Machine learning, Big data, Sampling techniques, Customer churn, Customer retention, Financial services, Community bank.","PeriodicalId":330012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Finance & Banking","volume":"6 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Finance & Banking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47260/jafb/1445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Using real customer data from a large community bank in the South of the US, this paper analyzes the customer churn prediction problem by constructing and comparing ten machine learning classification models with five sample techniques. Our results show that Random Forest, XG Boost, AdaBoost, and Bagging Meta classifiers dominate others in terms of overall accuracy, F-score, and AUC curve for the test observations. For the four classifiers, the overall accuracy ranges from 87% to 96% across five different sampling methods explored, while the AUC values range between 0.9 to 0.93. Considering overall accuracy and F-Score, AdaBoost with original and MTDF sampling technique dominates others; however, considering the AUC measure, XG Boost and Random Forest perform similarly to AdaBoost, which slightly dominate Bagging Meta across all sampling techniques; although the performance measures for these four classifiers are comparable across all sampling techniques. The paper further presents important features of customer churn behavior as predicted by the model. The diagnostic analysis also provides an insightful comparison between churned and non-churned customers. JEL classification numbers: C0, C5, C8, G21. Keywords: Machine learning, Big data, Sampling techniques, Customer churn, Customer retention, Financial services, Community bank.
利用机器学习框架预测银行客户流失率
摘要 本文利用美国南部一家大型社区银行的真实客户数据,通过构建和比较十种机器学习分类模型与五种样本技术,分析了客户流失预测问题。结果表明,随机森林(Random Forest)、XG Boost、AdaBoost 和 Bagging Meta 分类器在测试观测数据的总体准确率、F 分数和 AUC 曲线方面均占优势。就这四种分类器而言,在所探讨的五种不同采样方法中,总体准确率在 87% 到 96% 之间,而 AUC 值在 0.9 到 0.93 之间。考虑到总体准确率和 F 分数,采用原始和 MTDF 采样技术的 AdaBoost 在其他分类器中占优;然而,考虑到 AUC 指标,XG Boost 和随机森林的表现与 AdaBoost 相似,在所有采样技术中,它们略微优于 Bagging Meta;尽管在所有采样技术中,这四种分类器的性能指标相当。本文进一步介绍了模型所预测的客户流失行为的重要特征。诊断分析还对流失客户和非流失客户进行了深入比较:C0、C5、C8、G21.Keywords:机器学习 大数据 抽样技术 客户流失 客户保留 金融服务 社区银行
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信