The Issue of Subway Commuters’ Departure Time Choices under the Influence of Bike-Sharing

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Jie Yu, Jie Wang, Qiang Wen, Tao Chen
{"title":"The Issue of Subway Commuters’ Departure Time Choices under the Influence of Bike-Sharing","authors":"Jie Yu,&nbsp;Jie Wang,&nbsp;Qiang Wen,&nbsp;Tao Chen","doi":"10.1155/2024/2888275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Bike-sharing has a significant impact on commuters’ rational planning of their travel times, which can lead to an advance or delay in the peak passenger flow of the subway system during the morning peak. To explore the impact of bike-sharing on subway commuters’ choices of departure times, we developed a departure time choice model considering the effect of bike-sharing. This model considers both constant and linear marginal-activity utility and compares it with traditional departure time choice models. Research indicates that within the timeframe that ensures on-time arrival at work, models not accounting for bike-sharing services underestimate both the departure rate and the total number of commuters compared to actual figures. Specifically, under the constant marginal-activity utility, about 6.76% of commuters actually choose to depart earlier, while under the linear marginal-activity utility, this figure is 6.91%. Conversely, during the departure timeframes that lead to late arrival at work, the traditional model overestimates both the departure rate and total number of commuters. Finally, through case analysis, we further revealed the dynamic relationship between commuter departure rates, commuting fatigue, and number of bike-sharing and calculated the actual commuting costs for different proportions of bike-sharing. The results indicate that when the number of bike-sharing reaches 30% of the commuting demand, it can maximally reduce the commuting costs for commuters by approximately 23.32%. These findings offer a crucial basis for optimizing management strategies for morning peak subway commuting.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2888275","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2888275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bike-sharing has a significant impact on commuters’ rational planning of their travel times, which can lead to an advance or delay in the peak passenger flow of the subway system during the morning peak. To explore the impact of bike-sharing on subway commuters’ choices of departure times, we developed a departure time choice model considering the effect of bike-sharing. This model considers both constant and linear marginal-activity utility and compares it with traditional departure time choice models. Research indicates that within the timeframe that ensures on-time arrival at work, models not accounting for bike-sharing services underestimate both the departure rate and the total number of commuters compared to actual figures. Specifically, under the constant marginal-activity utility, about 6.76% of commuters actually choose to depart earlier, while under the linear marginal-activity utility, this figure is 6.91%. Conversely, during the departure timeframes that lead to late arrival at work, the traditional model overestimates both the departure rate and total number of commuters. Finally, through case analysis, we further revealed the dynamic relationship between commuter departure rates, commuting fatigue, and number of bike-sharing and calculated the actual commuting costs for different proportions of bike-sharing. The results indicate that when the number of bike-sharing reaches 30% of the commuting demand, it can maximally reduce the commuting costs for commuters by approximately 23.32%. These findings offer a crucial basis for optimizing management strategies for morning peak subway commuting.

Abstract Image

共享单车影响下的地铁乘客出发时间选择问题
共享单车对上班族合理规划出行时间有很大影响,可能导致地铁系统早高峰客流的提前或延后。为了探讨共享单车对地铁乘客选择出发时间的影响,我们建立了一个考虑共享单车影响的出发时间选择模型。该模型考虑了恒定和线性边际活动效用,并与传统的出发时间选择模型进行了比较。研究表明,在确保准时到达工作地点的时间范围内,未考虑共享单车服务的模型与实际数字相比,低估了出发率和通勤总人数。具体来说,在边际活动效用不变的情况下,约有 6.76% 的通勤者选择提前出发,而在线性边际活动效用的情况下,这一数字为 6.91%。相反,在导致上班迟到的出发时间段,传统模型高估了出发率和通勤者总人数。最后,通过案例分析,我们进一步揭示了通勤者出发率、通勤疲劳和共享单车数量之间的动态关系,并计算了不同比例共享单车的实际通勤成本。结果表明,当共享单车数量达到通勤需求的 30% 时,可最大限度地降低通勤者的通勤成本约 23.32%。这些发现为优化早高峰地铁通勤的管理策略提供了重要依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Transportation
Journal of Advanced Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Transportation (JAT) is a fully peer reviewed international journal in transportation research areas related to public transit, road traffic, transport networks and air transport. It publishes theoretical and innovative papers on analysis, design, operations, optimization and planning of multi-modal transport networks, transit & traffic systems, transport technology and traffic safety. Urban rail and bus systems, Pedestrian studies, traffic flow theory and control, Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) and automated and/or connected vehicles are some topics of interest. Highway engineering, railway engineering and logistics do not fall within the aims and scope of JAT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信