Ambient light intensity affecting ultrasound operator detection of liver lesions in cine-clips

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
P.Y.C. Lee , A. Mohamed Afif , A. Anthony , M. Goodyear , P. Lombardo
{"title":"Ambient light intensity affecting ultrasound operator detection of liver lesions in cine-clips","authors":"P.Y.C. Lee ,&nbsp;A. Mohamed Afif ,&nbsp;A. Anthony ,&nbsp;M. Goodyear ,&nbsp;P. Lombardo","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Ambient light (AL) is an important factor to improve ultrasound pathology detection. However, there are no established room AL levels recommended during an ultrasound examination. We aim to examine the diagnostic accuracy using different intensity of AL for the detection of liver lesions in anonymised pre-recorded cine-clips.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eight ultrasound operators with 5–14 years' professional experiences were prospectively recruited to evaluate 51 randomised cine-clips directly from one ultrasound machine. These 15-s clips of the right lobe of the liver in longitudinal and transverse planes were meant to simulate the ultrasound examination. Operators reviewed all cine-clips and responded to two questions per cine-clip regarding their detection performance under 3 AL settings; 3, 15 and 25 lux, at one lighting per visit. A repeat visit under each AL was performed to assess for intra-operator variability. Each operator completed six visits in total, with at least a 2-day washout period. The operators’ performance was compared against imaging reference standards from contrast CT/MRI for cine-clips with lesion and serial US for those without.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>AL with highest degree of diagnostic accuracy was found to be at 25 lux. Results from 8 operators revealed sensitivity ranged from 79% to 100%, specificity ranged from 94% to 100%. Positive and negative predictive values were up to 100% with AL at 25 lux. Both intra-and interrater reliability were excellent at 0.85–1.0 (0.79–0.98) and 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) respectively, with AL at 25 lux.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study proved that ambient light intensity affects the ultrasound operator detection of liver lesions on cine-clips.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Identifying suitable AL levels will influence future ultrasound room construct.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Ambient light (AL) is an important factor to improve ultrasound pathology detection. However, there are no established room AL levels recommended during an ultrasound examination. We aim to examine the diagnostic accuracy using different intensity of AL for the detection of liver lesions in anonymised pre-recorded cine-clips.

Methods

Eight ultrasound operators with 5–14 years' professional experiences were prospectively recruited to evaluate 51 randomised cine-clips directly from one ultrasound machine. These 15-s clips of the right lobe of the liver in longitudinal and transverse planes were meant to simulate the ultrasound examination. Operators reviewed all cine-clips and responded to two questions per cine-clip regarding their detection performance under 3 AL settings; 3, 15 and 25 lux, at one lighting per visit. A repeat visit under each AL was performed to assess for intra-operator variability. Each operator completed six visits in total, with at least a 2-day washout period. The operators’ performance was compared against imaging reference standards from contrast CT/MRI for cine-clips with lesion and serial US for those without.

Results

AL with highest degree of diagnostic accuracy was found to be at 25 lux. Results from 8 operators revealed sensitivity ranged from 79% to 100%, specificity ranged from 94% to 100%. Positive and negative predictive values were up to 100% with AL at 25 lux. Both intra-and interrater reliability were excellent at 0.85–1.0 (0.79–0.98) and 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) respectively, with AL at 25 lux.

Conclusion

This study proved that ambient light intensity affects the ultrasound operator detection of liver lesions on cine-clips.

Implications for practice

Identifying suitable AL levels will influence future ultrasound room construct.

环境光照强度对超声波操作员在电影剪辑中检测肝脏病变的影响
导言环境光(AL)是提高超声病理检测的一个重要因素。然而,在超声波检查过程中,并没有既定的室内 AL 水平建议。我们旨在研究使用不同强度的 AL 对匿名预录电影片段中的肝脏病变进行检测的诊断准确性。方法 我们前瞻性地招募了八名具有 5-14 年专业经验的超声波操作员,对 51 个直接从一台超声波机随机采集的电影片段进行评估。这些 15 秒的肝右叶纵向和横向平面剪辑旨在模拟超声检查。操作员查看了所有电影剪辑,并就每个电影剪辑在 3、15 和 25 勒克斯三种 AL 设置下的检测性能回答了两个问题。为了评估操作员之间的差异,还在每种 AL 下进行了一次重复检查。每位操作员共完成六次检查,至少有两天的冲洗期。将操作员的表现与对比 CT/MRI 的成像参考标准(有病变的电影剪辑)和序列 US 的成像参考标准(无病变的电影剪辑)进行比较。8 名操作员的结果显示,灵敏度从 79% 到 100% 不等,特异度从 94% 到 100% 不等。AL 值为 25 勒克斯时,阳性和阴性预测值均高达 100%。结论这项研究证明,环境光照强度会影响超声操作员在电影剪辑上对肝脏病变的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信