Multiple visual items can be simultaneously compared with target templates in memory.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Yujie Zheng, Jiafei Lou, Yunrong Lu, Zhi Li
{"title":"Multiple visual items can be simultaneously compared with target templates in memory.","authors":"Yujie Zheng, Jiafei Lou, Yunrong Lu, Zhi Li","doi":"10.3758/s13414-024-02906-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When we search for something, we often rely on both what we see and what we remember. This process can be divided into three stages: selecting items, identifying those items, and comparing them with what we are trying to find in our memory. It has been suggested that we select items one by one, and we can identify several items at once. In the present study, we tested whether we need to finish comparing a selected item in the visual display with one or more target templates in memory before we can move on to the next selected item. In Experiment 1, observers looked for either one or two target types in a rapid serially presented stimuli stream. The time interval between the presentation onset of successive items in the stream was varied to get a threshold. For search for one target, the threshold was 89 ms. When look for either of two targets, it was 192 ms. This threshold difference offered a baseline. In Experiment 2, observers looked for one or two types of target in a search array. If they compared each identified item separately, we should expect a jump in the slope of the RT × Set Size function, on the order of the baseline obtained in Experiment 1. However, the slope difference was only 13 ms/item, suggesting that several identified items can be compared at once with target templates in memory. Experiment 3 showed that this slope difference was not just a memory-load cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-024-02906-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When we search for something, we often rely on both what we see and what we remember. This process can be divided into three stages: selecting items, identifying those items, and comparing them with what we are trying to find in our memory. It has been suggested that we select items one by one, and we can identify several items at once. In the present study, we tested whether we need to finish comparing a selected item in the visual display with one or more target templates in memory before we can move on to the next selected item. In Experiment 1, observers looked for either one or two target types in a rapid serially presented stimuli stream. The time interval between the presentation onset of successive items in the stream was varied to get a threshold. For search for one target, the threshold was 89 ms. When look for either of two targets, it was 192 ms. This threshold difference offered a baseline. In Experiment 2, observers looked for one or two types of target in a search array. If they compared each identified item separately, we should expect a jump in the slope of the RT × Set Size function, on the order of the baseline obtained in Experiment 1. However, the slope difference was only 13 ms/item, suggesting that several identified items can be compared at once with target templates in memory. Experiment 3 showed that this slope difference was not just a memory-load cost.

多个视觉项目可同时与记忆中的目标模板进行比较。
当我们寻找某样东西时,我们通常会依靠我们所看到的和我们所记得的。这个过程可以分为三个阶段:选择物品、识别这些物品以及将它们与我们试图在记忆中找到的东西进行比较。有人认为,我们会一个一个地选择物品,也可以同时识别多个物品。在本研究中,我们测试了我们是否需要完成将视觉显示中的一个选定项目与记忆中的一个或多个目标模板进行比较之后才能继续下一个选定项目。在实验 1 中,观察者在快速连续呈现的刺激流中寻找一个或两个目标类型。为了得到一个阈值,我们改变了刺激流中连续项目开始呈现的时间间隔。寻找一个目标时,阈值为 89 毫秒。当寻找两个目标中的任何一个时,阈值为 192 毫秒。这一阈值差异提供了一个基线。在实验 2 中,观察者在搜索阵列中寻找一种或两种目标。如果他们分别比较每一个识别出的项目,我们就可以预期,RT × 集合大小函数的斜率会出现跳跃,与实验 1 中获得的基线大致相同。然而,斜率差异仅为 13 毫秒/项,这表明记忆中的目标模板可以同时比较多个识别出的项目。实验 3 表明,这种斜率差异不仅仅是记忆负荷成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信