U.S. Medical School Participation in Nationally Funded Biomedical Research: A New Accounting of NIH Award Dollars.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005778
Alexander G Geboy, Valerie M Dandar, Jordan Dutterer, Katherine Brandenburg, Hershel Alexander
{"title":"U.S. Medical School Participation in Nationally Funded Biomedical Research: A New Accounting of NIH Award Dollars.","authors":"Alexander G Geboy, Valerie M Dandar, Jordan Dutterer, Katherine Brandenburg, Hershel Alexander","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>To better understand the amount of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding received by U.S. medical schools with Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited medical education programs, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) developed a new methodology that crosswalks faculty NIH grants with medical schools and their affiliated organizations (e.g., teaching hospitals). This approach offers a more comprehensive and methodologically transparent accounting of NIH extramural funding to academic medicine than existing processes.The AAMC Crosswalk utilized publicly available grants data from the NIH and resources unique to the AAMC, such as the Faculty Roster and Council of Teaching Hospitals and Health Systems records. Using a multistep algorithm, the AAMC Crosswalk linked individual faculty with NIH grants, their organizations, and partner medical schools, aggregated at the level of the medical school and its affiliated organizations for fiscal year (FY) 2017-2021.The AAMC Crosswalk attributed, on average, $3.7 billion more per year in NIH funding to U.S. medical schools, representing a 24% increase compared to the NIH and Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research (BRIMR) methodologies. In FY 2021, the AAMC Crosswalk attributed 60% of NIH funding to U.S. medical schools compared with 47% by NIH and 50% by BRIMR. An exploration of limitations showed that no medical school affiliations were missed by the AAMC Crosswalk among 90 randomly sampled organizations, and medical school affiliations for 30 randomly sampled principal investigator faculty members were attributed correctly.These findings indicate that academic medicine's contribution to biomedical research may be greater than historically reported. Systematically accounting for grants awarded to faculty across medical schools and their affiliated organizations provides a more comprehensive understanding of NIH funding to U.S. medical schools. The AAMC Crosswalk provides a new tool to better estimate the true investment and role of academic medicine in advancing biomedical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005778","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: To better understand the amount of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding received by U.S. medical schools with Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited medical education programs, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) developed a new methodology that crosswalks faculty NIH grants with medical schools and their affiliated organizations (e.g., teaching hospitals). This approach offers a more comprehensive and methodologically transparent accounting of NIH extramural funding to academic medicine than existing processes.The AAMC Crosswalk utilized publicly available grants data from the NIH and resources unique to the AAMC, such as the Faculty Roster and Council of Teaching Hospitals and Health Systems records. Using a multistep algorithm, the AAMC Crosswalk linked individual faculty with NIH grants, their organizations, and partner medical schools, aggregated at the level of the medical school and its affiliated organizations for fiscal year (FY) 2017-2021.The AAMC Crosswalk attributed, on average, $3.7 billion more per year in NIH funding to U.S. medical schools, representing a 24% increase compared to the NIH and Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research (BRIMR) methodologies. In FY 2021, the AAMC Crosswalk attributed 60% of NIH funding to U.S. medical schools compared with 47% by NIH and 50% by BRIMR. An exploration of limitations showed that no medical school affiliations were missed by the AAMC Crosswalk among 90 randomly sampled organizations, and medical school affiliations for 30 randomly sampled principal investigator faculty members were attributed correctly.These findings indicate that academic medicine's contribution to biomedical research may be greater than historically reported. Systematically accounting for grants awarded to faculty across medical schools and their affiliated organizations provides a more comprehensive understanding of NIH funding to U.S. medical schools. The AAMC Crosswalk provides a new tool to better estimate the true investment and role of academic medicine in advancing biomedical research.

美国医学院参与国家资助的生物医学研究:对美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)奖金的新核算。
摘要:为了更好地了解拥有医学教育联络委员会认可的医学教育项目的美国医学院获得的美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的金额,美国医学院协会(AAMC)开发了一种新的方法,将美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的资助与医学院及其附属机构(如教学医院)进行交叉。AAMC Crosswalk 利用了美国国立卫生研究院公开的拨款数据和 AAMC 独有的资源,如教员名册和教学医院与卫生系统理事会记录。通过多步骤算法,AAMC Crosswalk 将个人教职员工与美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的拨款、他们的组织和合作医学院联系起来,并在医学院及其附属组织的层面上汇总了 2017-2021 财年(FY)的数据。AAMC Crosswalk 认为美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)平均每年向美国医学院提供的资金增加了 37 亿美元,与 NIH 和蓝岭医学研究所(BRIMR)的方法相比增加了 24%。2021 财年,AAMC Crosswalk 将 60% 的 NIH 资金分配给美国医学院,而 NIH 和 BRIMR 的分配比例分别为 47% 和 50%。对局限性的探讨表明,在随机抽样的 90 个机构中,AAMC Crosswalk 没有遗漏任何医学院的隶属关系,而且随机抽样的 30 名主要研究人员的医学院隶属关系归属正确。系统地统计医学院及其附属机构授予教职员工的拨款,可以更全面地了解美国国立卫生研究院对美国医学院的资助情况。AAMC Crosswalk 提供了一个新工具,可以更好地估算学术医学在推动生物医学研究方面的真实投资和作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信