Assessment of Biofilm Forming Capability and Antibiotic Resistance in Proteus mirabilis Colonizing Indwelling Catheter.

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Olivia Sochi Egbule, Omenogor Patricia Konye, Benson Chuck Iweriebor
{"title":"Assessment of Biofilm Forming Capability and Antibiotic Resistance in <i>Proteus mirabilis</i> Colonizing Indwelling Catheter.","authors":"Olivia Sochi Egbule, Omenogor Patricia Konye, Benson Chuck Iweriebor","doi":"10.3923/pjbs.2024.268.275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;Background and Objective:&lt;/b&gt; Urinary tract infections from the use of an indwelling urinary catheter are one of the most common infections caused by &lt;i&gt;Proteus mirabilis&lt;/i&gt;. Due to their biofilm-producing capacity and the increasing antimicrobial resistance in this microorganism, this study aimed to determine the prevalence, biofilm-producing capacity, antimicrobial resistance patterns, multidrug resistance and plasmid mediated resistance of the recovered isolates. &lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/b&gt; A total of 50 urinary samples were collected from May to August, 2018 from patients on indwelling urinary catheters. Using routine microbiological and biochemical methods, 37 &lt;i&gt;P. mirabilis&lt;/i&gt; were isolated. Biofilm forming capability was determined among the isolates using the tube method while antimicrobial susceptibility and plasmid curing were also performed. &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; All isolates were biofilm producers with 17(46%) being moderate producers while 20(54%) were strong biofilm formers. The study isolates exhibited a high resistance rate to empiric antibiotics, including ceftazidime (75.8%), cefuroxime (54.5%), ampicillin (69.7%) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (51.5%). Low resistance was seen in the fluoroquinolones, gentamicin and nitrofurantoin. Plasmid curing experiment revealed that most isolates lost their resistance indicating that resistance was borne on plasmids. Plasmid carriage is likely the reason for the high MDR rate of 56.8% observed. &lt;b&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/b&gt; These findings necessitate the provision of infection control programs which will guide and implement policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19800,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2024.268.275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

<b>Background and Objective:</b> Urinary tract infections from the use of an indwelling urinary catheter are one of the most common infections caused by <i>Proteus mirabilis</i>. Due to their biofilm-producing capacity and the increasing antimicrobial resistance in this microorganism, this study aimed to determine the prevalence, biofilm-producing capacity, antimicrobial resistance patterns, multidrug resistance and plasmid mediated resistance of the recovered isolates. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 50 urinary samples were collected from May to August, 2018 from patients on indwelling urinary catheters. Using routine microbiological and biochemical methods, 37 <i>P. mirabilis</i> were isolated. Biofilm forming capability was determined among the isolates using the tube method while antimicrobial susceptibility and plasmid curing were also performed. <b>Results:</b> All isolates were biofilm producers with 17(46%) being moderate producers while 20(54%) were strong biofilm formers. The study isolates exhibited a high resistance rate to empiric antibiotics, including ceftazidime (75.8%), cefuroxime (54.5%), ampicillin (69.7%) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (51.5%). Low resistance was seen in the fluoroquinolones, gentamicin and nitrofurantoin. Plasmid curing experiment revealed that most isolates lost their resistance indicating that resistance was borne on plasmids. Plasmid carriage is likely the reason for the high MDR rate of 56.8% observed. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings necessitate the provision of infection control programs which will guide and implement policies.

评估奇异变形杆菌在留置导管中的生物膜形成能力和抗生素耐药性。
<b>背景与目的:</b>使用留置导尿管引起的尿路感染是由神奇变形杆菌(Proteus mirabilis</i>)引起的最常见感染之一。由于这种微生物具有产生生物膜的能力,且抗菌药耐药性不断增加,本研究旨在确定回收分离株的患病率、生物膜产生能力、抗菌药耐药性模式、多药耐药性和质粒介导的耐药性。 <b>材料与方法:</b>2018 年 5 月至 8 月期间,从留置导尿管患者处共收集了 50 份尿液样本。使用常规微生物学和生化方法,分离出 37 <i>P.mirabilis</i>。结果:</b>所有分离株都能形成生物膜,其中 17 株(46%)为中度生物膜形成者,20 株(54%)为强生物膜形成者。研究分离菌株对经验性抗生素的耐药率很高,包括头孢他啶(75.8%)、头孢呋辛(54.5%)、氨苄西林(69.7%)和阿莫西林-克拉维酸(51.5%)。氟喹诺酮类、庆大霉素和硝基呋喃妥因的耐药性较低。质粒固化实验显示,大多数分离物失去了抗药性,这表明抗药性是由质粒携带的。质粒携带很可能是造成 56.8% 的高耐药率的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences (PJBS) is an international, peer-reviewed and well indexed scientific journal seeks to promote and disseminate the knowledge of biological sciences by publishing outstanding research in the field. Scope of the journal includes: Cell biology, developmental biology, structural biology, microbiology, entomology, toxicology, molecular biology & genetics, biochemistry, biotechnology, biodiversity, ecology, marine biology, plant biology and bioinformatics.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信