Amritha Stalin, Ran Ding, Susan J Leat, Ohwod Binhilabi, Tammy Labreche
{"title":"Visual midline gauge validity and repeatability: Comparison to a current clinical method.","authors":"Amritha Stalin, Ran Ding, Susan J Leat, Ohwod Binhilabi, Tammy Labreche","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Visual midline shifts are thought to occur post-stroke and be a risk factor for falls. This study investigates a new method for quantifying visual midline shifts, a first step toward developing greater understanding of visual midline shift.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study standardized the parameters of a novel visual midline gauge, compared the results with the current clinical method, and presents normative data and repeatability of both methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-three participants without neurological or ocular problems were recruited in Canada and Hong Kong. In experiment 1, horizontal and vertical visual midlines were measured using the gauge for two speeds and two repositioning methods. In experiment 2, visual midline was measured for three distances using a target speed and repositioning method chosen based on the first experiment. Visual midlines were also measured using the current clinical method during both visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant effects of age, speed, study location, or repositioning method on visual midline positions (all p>0.05). For the horizontal direction, measurements at 25 cm were different from those at 50 (p=0.03) and 100 cm (p=0.001). For the vertical direction, there was no such effect. The measurements were found to be repeatable to within approximately 3°. In both visits, there were significant correlations between measurements using the visual midline gauge and the clinical method for the vertical direction (all p<.001) but not for the horizontal direction (all p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The measurement of visual midline is tolerant of differences in target speed, testing method, and age of the participants, and the visual midline gauge measurements are repeatable.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":" ","pages":"368-378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Significance: Visual midline shifts are thought to occur post-stroke and be a risk factor for falls. This study investigates a new method for quantifying visual midline shifts, a first step toward developing greater understanding of visual midline shift.
Purpose: This study standardized the parameters of a novel visual midline gauge, compared the results with the current clinical method, and presents normative data and repeatability of both methods.
Methods: Ninety-three participants without neurological or ocular problems were recruited in Canada and Hong Kong. In experiment 1, horizontal and vertical visual midlines were measured using the gauge for two speeds and two repositioning methods. In experiment 2, visual midline was measured for three distances using a target speed and repositioning method chosen based on the first experiment. Visual midlines were also measured using the current clinical method during both visits.
Results: There were no significant effects of age, speed, study location, or repositioning method on visual midline positions (all p>0.05). For the horizontal direction, measurements at 25 cm were different from those at 50 (p=0.03) and 100 cm (p=0.001). For the vertical direction, there was no such effect. The measurements were found to be repeatable to within approximately 3°. In both visits, there were significant correlations between measurements using the visual midline gauge and the clinical method for the vertical direction (all p<.001) but not for the horizontal direction (all p>0.05).
Conclusions: The measurement of visual midline is tolerant of differences in target speed, testing method, and age of the participants, and the visual midline gauge measurements are repeatable.
期刊介绍：
Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
