Dissimilarity in flea and host assemblages and their interaction networks along a spatial distance gradient: different patterns revealed by different network dissimilarity metrics.

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Oecologia Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1007/s00442-024-05578-z
Boris R Krasnov, Goni Barki, Irina S Khokhlova
{"title":"Dissimilarity in flea and host assemblages and their interaction networks along a spatial distance gradient: different patterns revealed by different network dissimilarity metrics.","authors":"Boris R Krasnov, Goni Barki, Irina S Khokhlova","doi":"10.1007/s00442-024-05578-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the distance-decay pattern (an increase in dissimilarity with increasing geographic distance) in regional assemblages of fleas and their small mammalian hosts, as well as their interaction networks, in four biogeographic realms. Dissimilarity of assemblages (βtotal) was partitioned into species richness differences (βrich) and species replacement (βrepl) components. Dissimilarity of networks was assessed using two metrics: (a) whole network dissimilarity (β<sub>WN</sub>) partitioned into species replacement (β<sub>ST</sub>) and interaction rewiring (β<sub>OS</sub>) components and (b) D statistics, measuring dissimilarity in the pure structure of the networks, without using information on species identities and calculated for hosts-shared-by-fleas networks (Dh) and fleas-shared-by-hosts networks (Df). We asked whether the distance-decay pattern (a) occurs among interactor assemblages or their interaction networks; (b) depends on the network dissimilarity metric used; and (c) differs between realms. The βtotal and βrepl of flea and host assemblages increased with distance in all realms except for host assemblages in the Afrotropics. βrich for flea and host assemblages increased with distance in the Nearctic only. In networks, β<sub>WN</sub> and β<sub>ST</sub> demonstrated a distance-decay pattern, whereas β<sub>OS</sub> was mainly spatially invariant except in the Neotropics. Correlations of Dh or Df and geographic distance were mostly non-significant. We conclude that investigations of dissimilarity in interaction networks should include both types of dissimilarity metrics (those that consider partner identities and those that consider the pure structure of networks). This will allow elucidating the predictability of some facets of network dissimilarity and the unpredictability of other facets.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":" ","pages":"397-409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-024-05578-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the distance-decay pattern (an increase in dissimilarity with increasing geographic distance) in regional assemblages of fleas and their small mammalian hosts, as well as their interaction networks, in four biogeographic realms. Dissimilarity of assemblages (βtotal) was partitioned into species richness differences (βrich) and species replacement (βrepl) components. Dissimilarity of networks was assessed using two metrics: (a) whole network dissimilarity (βWN) partitioned into species replacement (βST) and interaction rewiring (βOS) components and (b) D statistics, measuring dissimilarity in the pure structure of the networks, without using information on species identities and calculated for hosts-shared-by-fleas networks (Dh) and fleas-shared-by-hosts networks (Df). We asked whether the distance-decay pattern (a) occurs among interactor assemblages or their interaction networks; (b) depends on the network dissimilarity metric used; and (c) differs between realms. The βtotal and βrepl of flea and host assemblages increased with distance in all realms except for host assemblages in the Afrotropics. βrich for flea and host assemblages increased with distance in the Nearctic only. In networks, βWN and βST demonstrated a distance-decay pattern, whereas βOS was mainly spatially invariant except in the Neotropics. Correlations of Dh or Df and geographic distance were mostly non-significant. We conclude that investigations of dissimilarity in interaction networks should include both types of dissimilarity metrics (those that consider partner identities and those that consider the pure structure of networks). This will allow elucidating the predictability of some facets of network dissimilarity and the unpredictability of other facets.

Abstract Image

沿空间距离梯度的跳蚤和宿主组合及其相互作用网络的差异性:不同网络差异性指标揭示的不同模式。
我们研究了四个生物地理区域中跳蚤及其小型哺乳动物宿主的区域组合及其相互作用网络的距离衰减模式(随着地理距离的增加,相似性增加)。组合的相似性(βtotal)分为物种丰富度差异(βrich)和物种替换(βrepl)两个部分。网络的相似性用两个指标来评估:(a) 整个网络的相似性(βWN),分为物种替换(βST)和相互作用重配(βOS)两个部分;(b) D 统计量,测量网络纯结构的相似性,不使用物种身份信息,计算寄主共享跳蚤网络(Dh)和跳蚤共享寄主网络(Df)。我们询问了距离衰减模式是否(a)发生在互作者集合体或其互作网络之间;(b)取决于所使用的网络相似度指标;以及(c)在不同领域之间存在差异。除非洲热带地区的寄主群落外,所有地区跳蚤和寄主群落的 βtotal 和 βrepl 都随着距离的增加而增加。仅在近地,跳蚤和宿主组合的 βrich 随距离的增加而增加。在网络中,βWN 和 βST 表现出距离衰减模式,而 βOS 除新热带地区外主要是空间不变的。Dh 或 Df 与地理距离的相关性大多不显著。我们的结论是,对互动网络中相似性的研究应包括两类相似性指标(考虑伙伴身份的指标和考虑网络纯结构的指标)。这将有助于阐明网络相似性某些方面的可预测性和其他方面的不可预测性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信