Clinical and safety outcomes of acute stenting plus thrombectomy for carotid tandem lesions with large ischemic core.

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Yakub Deliktas, Imad Derraz, Stephanos Finitsis, Jildaz Caroff, Romain Bourcier, Sébastien Soize, Solène Moulin, Sébastien Richard, Gaultier Marnat, Matúš Hoferica, Christophe Cognard, Jean-Philippe Desilles, Mohammad Anadani, Jean-Marc Olivot, Barbara Casolla, Arturo Consoli, Bertrand Lapergue, Benjamin Gory
{"title":"Clinical and safety outcomes of acute stenting plus thrombectomy for carotid tandem lesions with large ischemic core.","authors":"Yakub Deliktas, Imad Derraz, Stephanos Finitsis, Jildaz Caroff, Romain Bourcier, Sébastien Soize, Solène Moulin, Sébastien Richard, Gaultier Marnat, Matúš Hoferica, Christophe Cognard, Jean-Philippe Desilles, Mohammad Anadani, Jean-Marc Olivot, Barbara Casolla, Arturo Consoli, Bertrand Lapergue, Benjamin Gory","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-021517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the clinical and safety outcomes of emergent carotid artery stenting (eCAS) plus endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) among patients with anterior tandem lesion (TL) and large ischemic core (LIC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included consecutive stroke patients enrolled in the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry in France between January 2015 and June 2023. We compared the outcomes of carotid stenting vs no stenting in tandem lesion with pre-treatment LIC (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) 3-5) and stenting in tandem lesion vs thrombectomy alone for isolated intracranial occlusions with pre-treatment LIC. Primary outcome was a score of 0 to 3 on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 218 tandem patients with LIC, 55 were treated with eCAS plus EVT. The eCAS group had higher odds of 90-day mRS 0-3 (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 5.21; p=0.027). There were no differences in the risk of any intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.86; p=0.346), parenchymal hematoma (aOR 1.216, 95% CI 0.49 to 3.02; p=0.675), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.48; p=0.409), or 90-day mortality (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.68; p=0.472). eCAS was associated with a higher rate of carotid patency at day 1 (aOR 3.54, 95% CI 1.14 to 11.01; p=0.028). Safety outcomes were similar between EVT+eCAS group in TL-LIC and EVT alone group in isolated intracranial occlusions with LIC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>eCAS appears to be a safe and effective strategy in patients with TL and LIC volume.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"e216-e221"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-021517","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the clinical and safety outcomes of emergent carotid artery stenting (eCAS) plus endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) among patients with anterior tandem lesion (TL) and large ischemic core (LIC).

Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive stroke patients enrolled in the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry in France between January 2015 and June 2023. We compared the outcomes of carotid stenting vs no stenting in tandem lesion with pre-treatment LIC (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) 3-5) and stenting in tandem lesion vs thrombectomy alone for isolated intracranial occlusions with pre-treatment LIC. Primary outcome was a score of 0 to 3 on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression was performed.

Results: Among 218 tandem patients with LIC, 55 were treated with eCAS plus EVT. The eCAS group had higher odds of 90-day mRS 0-3 (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 5.21; p=0.027). There were no differences in the risk of any intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.86; p=0.346), parenchymal hematoma (aOR 1.216, 95% CI 0.49 to 3.02; p=0.675), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.48; p=0.409), or 90-day mortality (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.68; p=0.472). eCAS was associated with a higher rate of carotid patency at day 1 (aOR 3.54, 95% CI 1.14 to 11.01; p=0.028). Safety outcomes were similar between EVT+eCAS group in TL-LIC and EVT alone group in isolated intracranial occlusions with LIC.

Conclusion: eCAS appears to be a safe and effective strategy in patients with TL and LIC volume.

急性支架植入术加血栓切除术治疗大面积缺血核心颈动脉串联病变的临床和安全性结果。
背景:我们评估了前串联病变(TL)和大缺血核心(LIC)患者接受紧急颈动脉支架植入术(eCAS)加血管内血栓切除术(EVT)的临床和安全性结果:这项回顾性研究纳入了2015年1月至2023年6月期间在法国缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗登记处登记的连续脑卒中患者。我们比较了治疗前LIC(阿尔伯塔省卒中项目早期CT评分(ASPECTS)3-5分)的串联病变中颈动脉支架植入术与无支架植入术的疗效,以及治疗前LIC的孤立性颅内闭塞中串联病变中支架植入术与单纯血栓切除术的疗效。主要结果为 90 天后改良兰金量表(mRS)评分为 0 至 3 分。进行了多变量混合效应逻辑回归:在218名LIC串联患者中,55人接受了eCAS加EVT治疗。eCAS 组 90 天 mRS 0-3 的几率更高(调整奥德比 (aOR) 2.40,95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.10 至 5.21;P=0.027)。任何脑内出血(OR 1.41,95% CI 0.69 至 2.86;p=0.346)、脑实质血肿(aOR 1.216,95% CI 0.49 至 3.02;p=0.675)、症状性脑内出血(aOR 1.eCAS与较高的第1天颈动脉通畅率相关(aOR 3.54,95% CI 1.14至11.01;p=0.028)。TL-LIC中EVT+eCAS组与LIC孤立性颅内闭塞中单纯EVT组的安全性结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信