Variant-specific BCR::ABL1 quantification discrepancy in chronic myeloid leukemia

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Koen Jacobs, Alena Moerman, Karl Vandepoele, Tim Van den Abeele, Katrien De Mulder, Eva Steel, Maxim Clauwaert, Henk Louagie
{"title":"Variant-specific BCR::ABL1 quantification discrepancy in chronic myeloid leukemia","authors":"Koen Jacobs,&nbsp;Alena Moerman,&nbsp;Karl Vandepoele,&nbsp;Tim Van den Abeele,&nbsp;Katrien De Mulder,&nbsp;Eva Steel,&nbsp;Maxim Clauwaert,&nbsp;Henk Louagie","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Accurate quantification of the <i>BCR::ABL1</i> fusion gene in whole blood is pivotal for the clinical management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. The fusion protein encoded by <i>BCR::ABL1</i> can vary in size, depending on the <i>BCR</i> and/or <i>ABL1</i> gene breakpoint. The vast majority of CML patients have a p210 <i>BCR::ABL1</i> fusion gene (M-BCR), which can be attributed to the presence of either e14a2 (b3a2) or e13a2 (b2a2) mRNA transcript junctions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-five CML samples were analyzed in two different ISO15189-accredited centers that both use an Europe Against Cancer-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) protocol. Reanalysis of the sample set with transcript-specific standard curves and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>qPCR quantification revealed a significant (up to 1 log) difference specifically for the e13a2 transcript variant in contrast to e14a2 transcripts (Hodges–Lehman 4.29; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Reanalysis of the sample set with transcript-specific standard curves abolishes the initial transcript-specific difference (Hodges–Lehman 0.003; <i>p</i> = 0.8192). Comparison of transcript-specific qPCR results of both centers with ddPCR, an absolute quantification method, showed a statically significant association, especially in the lower range, indicating the clinical utility of transcript-specific or absolute quantification methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our data show that differences between transcript-specific quantification might exist between centers, leading to potential clinical impact on the follow-up of CML patients. The use of transcript-specific standard curves for qPCR quantification, or absolute quantification, can significantly reduce these differences. Specific attention should be applied to the interpretation of quantification differences of CML patients that switch between diagnostic centers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Accurate quantification of the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene in whole blood is pivotal for the clinical management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. The fusion protein encoded by BCR::ABL1 can vary in size, depending on the BCR and/or ABL1 gene breakpoint. The vast majority of CML patients have a p210 BCR::ABL1 fusion gene (M-BCR), which can be attributed to the presence of either e14a2 (b3a2) or e13a2 (b2a2) mRNA transcript junctions.

Methods

Twenty-five CML samples were analyzed in two different ISO15189-accredited centers that both use an Europe Against Cancer-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) protocol. Reanalysis of the sample set with transcript-specific standard curves and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) were performed.

Results

qPCR quantification revealed a significant (up to 1 log) difference specifically for the e13a2 transcript variant in contrast to e14a2 transcripts (Hodges–Lehman 4.29; p < 0.001). Reanalysis of the sample set with transcript-specific standard curves abolishes the initial transcript-specific difference (Hodges–Lehman 0.003; p = 0.8192). Comparison of transcript-specific qPCR results of both centers with ddPCR, an absolute quantification method, showed a statically significant association, especially in the lower range, indicating the clinical utility of transcript-specific or absolute quantification methods.

Conclusion

Our data show that differences between transcript-specific quantification might exist between centers, leading to potential clinical impact on the follow-up of CML patients. The use of transcript-specific standard curves for qPCR quantification, or absolute quantification, can significantly reduce these differences. Specific attention should be applied to the interpretation of quantification differences of CML patients that switch between diagnostic centers.

慢性髓性白血病中BCR::ABL1的变异特异性定量差异。
简介:全血中 BCR::ABL1 融合基因的精确定量对于慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者的临床治疗至关重要。根据 BCR 和/或 ABL1 基因断点的不同,BCR::ABL1 所编码的融合蛋白的大小也不同。绝大多数 CML 患者有 p210 BCR::ABL1 融合基因(M-BCR),这可能是由于存在 e14a2 (b3a2) 或 e13a2 (b2a2) mRNA 转录本连接:在两个不同的 ISO15189 认证中心对 25 份 CML 样本进行了分析,这两个中心均使用基于欧洲抗癌协会的定量聚合酶链反应 (qPCR) 方案。结果:qPCR 定量显示,与 e14a2 转录本相比,e13a2 转录本变异具有显著差异(高达 1 log)(Hodges-Lehman 4.29;p 结论:我们的数据显示,转录本变异与 e14a2 转录本之间存在显著差异(高达 1 log):我们的数据显示,不同中心的转录本特异性定量可能存在差异,这可能会对 CML 患者的随访产生临床影响。使用转录本特异性标准曲线进行 qPCR 定量或绝对定量可显著减少这些差异。应特别注意解释转换诊断中心的 CML 患者的定量差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology. The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence. The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines. The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信