An alternative method for SARS-CoV-2 detection with use modified fluorescent in situ hybridization.

IF 3.5 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Agnieszka Sroka-Oleksiak, Agnieszka Krawczyk, Katarzyna Talaga-Ćwiertnia, Dominika Salamon, Monika Brzychczy-Włoch, Tomasz Gosiewski
{"title":"An alternative method for SARS-CoV-2 detection with use modified fluorescent in situ hybridization.","authors":"Agnieszka Sroka-Oleksiak, Agnieszka Krawczyk, Katarzyna Talaga-Ćwiertnia, Dominika Salamon, Monika Brzychczy-Włoch, Tomasz Gosiewski","doi":"10.1186/s13568-024-01726-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction (rRT-PCR) tests are the gold standard in detecting SARS-CoV-2 virus infection. However, despite high sensitivity and specificity, they have limitations that in some cases may result in false negative results. Therefore, it is reasonable to search for additional tools that could support microbiological diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. The aim of the study was to develop a highly specific molecular test capable of detecting and visualizing SARS-CoV-2 infection. A universal probe and a set of 18 specific oligonucleotides with a FLAP sequence attached to them on both sides were designed to visualize SARS-CoV-2 virus infection based on the fluorescence in situ hybridization method (FISH). FISH conditions using the developed kit were standardized on the Vero CCL-81 cell line infected by SARS-CoV-2 virus. The method was tested on 290 nasopharyngeal swabs (collected in a doublet) from patients with clinical symptoms of SARS-CoV-2. Each one swab from the doublet was subjected to RNA isolation and amplification by rRT-PCR. From the second swab, a microscopic preparation was performed for FISH. The use of the rRT-PCR allowed obtaining 200 positive and 90 negative results, while our FISH method allowed for 220 positive results and 70 negative results. The differences obtained using both methods were statistically significant (p = 0.008). The obtained results support the use of FISH as an additional method in microbiological diagnostics of SARS-CoV-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":7537,"journal":{"name":"AMB Express","volume":"14 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11156814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMB Express","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-024-01726-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction (rRT-PCR) tests are the gold standard in detecting SARS-CoV-2 virus infection. However, despite high sensitivity and specificity, they have limitations that in some cases may result in false negative results. Therefore, it is reasonable to search for additional tools that could support microbiological diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. The aim of the study was to develop a highly specific molecular test capable of detecting and visualizing SARS-CoV-2 infection. A universal probe and a set of 18 specific oligonucleotides with a FLAP sequence attached to them on both sides were designed to visualize SARS-CoV-2 virus infection based on the fluorescence in situ hybridization method (FISH). FISH conditions using the developed kit were standardized on the Vero CCL-81 cell line infected by SARS-CoV-2 virus. The method was tested on 290 nasopharyngeal swabs (collected in a doublet) from patients with clinical symptoms of SARS-CoV-2. Each one swab from the doublet was subjected to RNA isolation and amplification by rRT-PCR. From the second swab, a microscopic preparation was performed for FISH. The use of the rRT-PCR allowed obtaining 200 positive and 90 negative results, while our FISH method allowed for 220 positive results and 70 negative results. The differences obtained using both methods were statistically significant (p = 0.008). The obtained results support the use of FISH as an additional method in microbiological diagnostics of SARS-CoV-2.

Abstract Image

使用改良荧光原位杂交法检测 SARS-CoV-2 的替代方法。
实时逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)检测是检测 SARS-CoV-2 病毒感染的金标准。然而,尽管灵敏度和特异性都很高,但它们也有局限性,在某些情况下可能会导致假阴性结果。因此,寻找其他工具来支持 SARS-CoV-2 的微生物学诊断是合理的。本研究的目的是开发一种能检测和显示 SARS-CoV-2 感染的高特异性分子检测方法。研究人员设计了一个通用探针和一组 18 个特异性寡核苷酸,这些寡核苷酸的两面都附有 FLAP 序列,可根据荧光原位杂交法(FISH)检测 SARS-CoV-2 病毒感染。在感染了 SARS-CoV-2 病毒的 Vero CCL-81 细胞系上对使用所开发试剂盒的 FISH 条件进行了标准化。该方法在有 SARS-CoV-2 临床症状的患者的 290 份鼻咽拭子(双份采集)上进行了测试。双份拭子中的每一份都进行了 RNA 分离和 rRT-PCR 扩增。第二份拭子在显微镜下进行 FISH 检测。使用 rRT-PCR 可获得 200 个阳性结果和 90 个阴性结果,而我们的 FISH 方法可获得 220 个阳性结果和 70 个阴性结果。两种方法的结果差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.008)。所得结果支持使用 FISH 作为 SARS-CoV-2 微生物诊断的补充方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AMB Express
AMB Express BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: AMB Express is a high quality journal that brings together research in the area of Applied and Industrial Microbiology with a particular interest in ''White Biotechnology'' and ''Red Biotechnology''. The emphasis is on processes employing microorganisms, eukaryotic cell cultures or enzymes for the biosynthesis, transformation and degradation of compounds. This includes fine and bulk chemicals, polymeric compounds and enzymes or other proteins. Downstream processes are also considered. Integrated processes combining biochemical and chemical processes are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信