Assessing the interplay of contrast, defocus, and resolution in cryo-EM: a benchmark experiment for limited dataset screening

IF 2.5 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Hayeon Lee, Yeseul Lee, Jinseok Lee, Hyeongseop Jeong, Dong Keon Yon, Clarissa L. Durie, Bumhan Ryu, Jeong Min Chung
{"title":"Assessing the interplay of contrast, defocus, and resolution in cryo-EM: a benchmark experiment for limited dataset screening","authors":"Hayeon Lee, Yeseul Lee, Jinseok Lee, Hyeongseop Jeong, Dong Keon Yon, Clarissa L. Durie, Bumhan Ryu, Jeong Min Chung","doi":"10.1186/s40543-024-00445-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The selection of defocus ranges for small datasets in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is under-researched. We present a comprehensive benchmark experiment that aimed to evaluate the relationship between contrast, defocus, and resolution, particularly in the context of limited datasets. We conducted a detailed analysis of beta-galactosidase, apo-ferritin, and connexin-46/50 datasets to optimize pre-screening strategies for cryo-EM. Our approach involved classifying micrographs based on image contrast using an artificial intelligence (AI) model without considering the defocus level. This method allowed us to investigate the optimal defocus range for pre-screening in a limited dataset and its impact on the overall image processing. The micrographs were categorized into good, moderate, and bad contrast groups. Subsequent analysis revealed that, contrary to the prevailing assumption that lower contrast (associated with lower defocus) leads to higher resolution, in scenarios with limited datasets higher contrast images yield superior resolution. This finding was consistent across all three protein samples, underscoring the critical role of contrast in determining the quality of 3D reconstructions in limited datasets. This significant finding challenges conventional cryo-EM methodologies. In conclusion, our study provides new benchmarks for selecting appropriate contrast and defocus levels in cryo-EM, particularly for screening approaches that use limited datasets. This strategy promises to enhance the data quality and efficiency in structural biology research, particularly in resource-constrained scenarios.","PeriodicalId":14967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Science and Technology","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-024-00445-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The selection of defocus ranges for small datasets in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is under-researched. We present a comprehensive benchmark experiment that aimed to evaluate the relationship between contrast, defocus, and resolution, particularly in the context of limited datasets. We conducted a detailed analysis of beta-galactosidase, apo-ferritin, and connexin-46/50 datasets to optimize pre-screening strategies for cryo-EM. Our approach involved classifying micrographs based on image contrast using an artificial intelligence (AI) model without considering the defocus level. This method allowed us to investigate the optimal defocus range for pre-screening in a limited dataset and its impact on the overall image processing. The micrographs were categorized into good, moderate, and bad contrast groups. Subsequent analysis revealed that, contrary to the prevailing assumption that lower contrast (associated with lower defocus) leads to higher resolution, in scenarios with limited datasets higher contrast images yield superior resolution. This finding was consistent across all three protein samples, underscoring the critical role of contrast in determining the quality of 3D reconstructions in limited datasets. This significant finding challenges conventional cryo-EM methodologies. In conclusion, our study provides new benchmarks for selecting appropriate contrast and defocus levels in cryo-EM, particularly for screening approaches that use limited datasets. This strategy promises to enhance the data quality and efficiency in structural biology research, particularly in resource-constrained scenarios.
评估低温电子显微镜中对比度、散焦和分辨率的相互作用:有限数据集筛选的基准实验
针对低温电子显微镜(cryo-EM)小数据集的散焦范围选择研究不足。我们介绍了一项综合基准实验,旨在评估对比度、散焦和分辨率之间的关系,尤其是在有限数据集的情况下。我们对 beta-半乳糖苷酶、apo-铁蛋白和 connexin-46/50 数据集进行了详细分析,以优化冷冻电镜的预筛选策略。我们的方法是使用人工智能(AI)模型根据图像对比度对显微照片进行分类,而不考虑离焦水平。通过这种方法,我们可以研究在有限的数据集中进行预筛选的最佳散焦范围及其对整个图像处理的影响。显微照片被分为良好、中等和不良对比度组。随后的分析表明,与普遍认为低对比度(与低散焦相关)会导致高分辨率的假设相反,在数据集有限的情况下,高对比度图像会产生更高的分辨率。这一发现在所有三种蛋白质样本中都是一致的,突出了对比度在有限数据集中决定三维重建质量的关键作用。这一重大发现对传统的低温电子显微镜方法提出了挑战。总之,我们的研究为在低温电子显微镜中选择适当的对比度和散焦水平提供了新的基准,特别是对于使用有限数据集的筛选方法。这一策略有望提高结构生物学研究的数据质量和效率,尤其是在资源有限的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Analytical Science and Technology
Journal of Analytical Science and Technology Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Science and Technology (JAST) is a fully open access peer-reviewed scientific journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. JAST was launched by Korea Basic Science Institute in 2010. JAST publishes original research and review articles on all aspects of analytical principles, techniques, methods, procedures, and equipment. JAST’s vision is to be an internationally influential and widely read analytical science journal. Our mission is to inform and stimulate researchers to make significant professional achievements in science. We aim to provide scientists, researchers, and students worldwide with unlimited access to the latest advances of the analytical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信