An inclusive, empirically grounded inventory facilitates recognition of diverse area-based conservation of nature

IF 15.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Siyu Qin, Yifan He, Rachel E. Golden Kroner, Sushma Shrestha, Bruno Henriques Coutinho, Marion Karmann, Juan Carlos Ledezma, Christian Martinez, Vilisa Morón-Zambrano, Roberto Ulloa, Edgard Yerena, Curtis Bernard, Joseph W. Bull, Eddy Mendoza, Nyls de Pracontal, Katie Reytar, Peter Veit, Erik Olsson, Clara L. Matallana-Tobón, Liz Alden Wily, Michael B. Mascia
{"title":"An inclusive, empirically grounded inventory facilitates recognition of diverse area-based conservation of nature","authors":"Siyu Qin, Yifan He, Rachel E. Golden Kroner, Sushma Shrestha, Bruno Henriques Coutinho, Marion Karmann, Juan Carlos Ledezma, Christian Martinez, Vilisa Morón-Zambrano, Roberto Ulloa, Edgard Yerena, Curtis Bernard, Joseph W. Bull, Eddy Mendoza, Nyls de Pracontal, Katie Reytar, Peter Veit, Erik Olsson, Clara L. Matallana-Tobón, Liz Alden Wily, Michael B. Mascia","doi":"10.1016/j.oneear.2024.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the international community strives to conserve 30% of Earth’s lands and waters by 2030, the full extent of area-based conservation remains unclear. Official databases do not fully recognize and track the diversity of conservation-relevant governance systems, hindering conservation research, policy, planning, and action. Here, we describe and test an inclusive, empirically grounded approach to documenting area-based governance systems that potentially advance biodiversity conservation. Among Amazonian countries, we identify greater area coverage and diversity of conservation governance systems than official databases. We further illustrate the relevance of this approach using global examples of under-recognized conservation governance systems. Our findings highlight the need for an inclusive, empirically grounded inventory that reflects the full diversity of area-based conservation systems. We recommend researchers, governments, non-state actors, and donors to adopt similar inventories to increase feasibility, transparency, and inclusivity as a foundational component of global efforts to fulfill international commitments and create a nature-positive future.</p>","PeriodicalId":52366,"journal":{"name":"One Earth","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Earth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.03.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the international community strives to conserve 30% of Earth’s lands and waters by 2030, the full extent of area-based conservation remains unclear. Official databases do not fully recognize and track the diversity of conservation-relevant governance systems, hindering conservation research, policy, planning, and action. Here, we describe and test an inclusive, empirically grounded approach to documenting area-based governance systems that potentially advance biodiversity conservation. Among Amazonian countries, we identify greater area coverage and diversity of conservation governance systems than official databases. We further illustrate the relevance of this approach using global examples of under-recognized conservation governance systems. Our findings highlight the need for an inclusive, empirically grounded inventory that reflects the full diversity of area-based conservation systems. We recommend researchers, governments, non-state actors, and donors to adopt similar inventories to increase feasibility, transparency, and inclusivity as a foundational component of global efforts to fulfill international commitments and create a nature-positive future.

Abstract Image

以经验为基础的包容性清单有助于认识到以地区为基础的自然保护的多样性
国际社会正努力在 2030 年前保护地球上 30% 的陆地和水域,但以区域为基础的保护的全部范围仍不清楚。官方数据库没有充分认识和跟踪与保护相关的治理系统的多样性,从而阻碍了保护研究、政策、规划和行动。在此,我们描述并测试了一种包容性的、以经验为基础的方法,用于记录有可能促进生物多样性保护的基于地区的治理体系。在亚马逊地区的国家中,我们发现了比官方数据库更大的保护治理系统的覆盖面积和多样性。我们还利用全球未得到充分认可的保护治理体系实例进一步说明了这种方法的相关性。我们的研究结果突出表明,有必要编制一份以经验为基础的包容性清单,以全面反映基于地区的保护系统的多样性。我们建议研究人员、政府、非国家行为者和捐助者采用类似的清单,以提高可行性、透明度和包容性,作为全球努力履行国际承诺和创造自然积极未来的基础组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
One Earth
One Earth Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: One Earth, Cell Press' flagship sustainability journal, serves as a platform for high-quality research and perspectives that contribute to a deeper understanding and resolution of contemporary sustainability challenges. With monthly thematic issues, the journal aims to bridge gaps between natural, social, and applied sciences, along with the humanities. One Earth fosters the cross-pollination of ideas, inspiring transformative research to address the complexities of sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信