Application of coupling physics–based model TRIGRS with random forest in rainfall-induced landslide-susceptibility assessment

IF 5.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Liu Yang, Yulong Cui, Chong Xu, Siyuan Ma
{"title":"Application of coupling physics–based model TRIGRS with random forest in rainfall-induced landslide-susceptibility assessment","authors":"Liu Yang, Yulong Cui, Chong Xu, Siyuan Ma","doi":"10.1007/s10346-024-02276-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most data-driven landslide-susceptibility assessment models heavily rely on statistical analyses based on geological and environmental similarity principles. These models often struggle to establish connections with landslide destruction processes and mechanisms effectively. In response to this challenge, this study introduces a hybrid approach that combines the transient rainfall infiltration, regional slope-stability physics–based model (TRIGRS) and the random forest (RF) model. Initially, to calculate the safety coefficients of the study area, the TRIGRS model was employed, and appropriate non-landslide samples were selected based on these coefficients. Subsequently, to enable learning and fitting of the nonlinear relationships between sample points and geological environmental factors, historical landslide data and safety coefficient-filtered non-landslide point data were input into the RF model, ultimately generating landslide probability values that represent the magnitude of landslide occurrences. The coupled model demonstrated excellent predictive performance using the landslides induced by the 2019 “Lekima” typhoon in Yongjia, Zhejiang Province, as a case study. The results indicated that the evaluation effect of the TRIGRS and RF coupled model was satisfactory, achieving an accuracy (ACC) rate of 77.6% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.873. Furthermore, the ACC and AUC of the TRIGRS and RF coupled model increased by 8.22% and 9.20%, respectively, compared with those of the traditional buffering sampling method. Therefore, the TRIGRS and RF coupled model better evaluates regional landslide susceptibility than the traditional buffering sampling method.</p>","PeriodicalId":17938,"journal":{"name":"Landslides","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landslides","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02276-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most data-driven landslide-susceptibility assessment models heavily rely on statistical analyses based on geological and environmental similarity principles. These models often struggle to establish connections with landslide destruction processes and mechanisms effectively. In response to this challenge, this study introduces a hybrid approach that combines the transient rainfall infiltration, regional slope-stability physics–based model (TRIGRS) and the random forest (RF) model. Initially, to calculate the safety coefficients of the study area, the TRIGRS model was employed, and appropriate non-landslide samples were selected based on these coefficients. Subsequently, to enable learning and fitting of the nonlinear relationships between sample points and geological environmental factors, historical landslide data and safety coefficient-filtered non-landslide point data were input into the RF model, ultimately generating landslide probability values that represent the magnitude of landslide occurrences. The coupled model demonstrated excellent predictive performance using the landslides induced by the 2019 “Lekima” typhoon in Yongjia, Zhejiang Province, as a case study. The results indicated that the evaluation effect of the TRIGRS and RF coupled model was satisfactory, achieving an accuracy (ACC) rate of 77.6% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.873. Furthermore, the ACC and AUC of the TRIGRS and RF coupled model increased by 8.22% and 9.20%, respectively, compared with those of the traditional buffering sampling method. Therefore, the TRIGRS and RF coupled model better evaluates regional landslide susceptibility than the traditional buffering sampling method.

Abstract Image

基于物理的 TRIGRS 模型与随机森林耦合在降雨引发的山体滑坡易感性评估中的应用
大多数数据驱动的滑坡易感性评估模型严重依赖于基于地质和环境相似性原则的统计分析。这些模型往往难以有效地与滑坡破坏过程和机制建立联系。为应对这一挑战,本研究引入了一种混合方法,将瞬态降雨渗透、基于物理原理的区域边坡稳定性模型(TRIGRS)和随机森林(RF)模型相结合。首先,采用 TRIGRS 模型计算研究区域的安全系数,并根据这些系数选择适当的非滑坡样本。随后,为了学习和拟合样本点与地质环境因素之间的非线性关系,将历史滑坡数据和经过安全系数过滤的非滑坡点数据输入 RF 模型,最终生成代表滑坡发生程度的滑坡概率值。以浙江永嘉 2019 年 "勒基玛 "台风诱发的滑坡为例,耦合模型展示了卓越的预测性能。结果表明,TRIGRS 和 RF 耦合模型的评估效果令人满意,准确率(ACC)达到 77.6%,曲线下面积(AUC)达到 0.873。此外,与传统的缓冲采样法相比,TRIGRS 和 RF 耦合模型的 ACC 和 AUC 分别提高了 8.22% 和 9.20%。因此,与传统的缓冲取样法相比,TRIGRS 和 RF 耦合模型能更好地评估区域滑坡易感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landslides
Landslides 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
14.90%
发文量
191
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Landslides are gravitational mass movements of rock, debris or earth. They may occur in conjunction with other major natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Expanding urbanization and changing land-use practices have increased the incidence of landslide disasters. Landslides as catastrophic events include human injury, loss of life and economic devastation and are studied as part of the fields of earth, water and engineering sciences. The aim of the journal Landslides is to be the common platform for the publication of integrated research on landslide processes, hazards, risk analysis, mitigation, and the protection of our cultural heritage and the environment. The journal publishes research papers, news of recent landslide events and information on the activities of the International Consortium on Landslides. - Landslide dynamics, mechanisms and processes - Landslide risk evaluation: hazard assessment, hazard mapping, and vulnerability assessment - Geological, Geotechnical, Hydrological and Geophysical modeling - Effects of meteorological, hydrological and global climatic change factors - Monitoring including remote sensing and other non-invasive systems - New technology, expert and intelligent systems - Application of GIS techniques - Rock slides, rock falls, debris flows, earth flows, and lateral spreads - Large-scale landslides, lahars and pyroclastic flows in volcanic zones - Marine and reservoir related landslides - Landslide related tsunamis and seiches - Landslide disasters in urban areas and along critical infrastructure - Landslides and natural resources - Land development and land-use practices - Landslide remedial measures / prevention works - Temporal and spatial prediction of landslides - Early warning and evacuation - Global landslide database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信