An update to the technology education teaching framework: factors that support and hinder technology education teachers in Canada

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
David D. Gill
{"title":"An update to the technology education teaching framework: factors that support and hinder technology education teachers in Canada","authors":"David D. Gill","doi":"10.1007/s10798-024-09907-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research paper presents the second in a series of case studies on teaching technology education within a Canadian context. Specifically, this paper will discuss what is helping and hindering the teaching of technology education and skilled trades at the secondary level (grades 10–12) in relation to a previous intermediate level (grades 7–9) case study.</p><p>In the previous research intermediate technology education was found to be marginalized in relation to other areas of the general curriculum within the Canadian context. As such, this research study sought to understand if marginalization and other related themes were present at the secondary level. The Technology Education Teaching Framework (TETF) which emphasises the role of teacher experience, professional development, and leadership was used as the primary lens of inquiry.</p><p>A qualitative case study methodology framed this study. Data were collected via an online questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, and classroom observations from a purposeful typical case sample of Canadian technology education and skilled trades teachers. Two cycle coding was used in conjunction with thematic analysis to analyze and interpret the data.</p><p>Secondary technology education and skilled trades teachers share similar beliefs and pedagogical practices as their intermediate counterparts. Themes of professionalism and systemic marginalization emerged as helping and hindering teachers’ efforts. However, at this level there was an identified tension between the values associated with the technology education and skilled trades curricula. Moving forward, raising the profile of technology education is framed within the potential transferability of local strategies and solutions to other jurisdictions with similar circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":50286,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology and Design Education","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology and Design Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09907-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research paper presents the second in a series of case studies on teaching technology education within a Canadian context. Specifically, this paper will discuss what is helping and hindering the teaching of technology education and skilled trades at the secondary level (grades 10–12) in relation to a previous intermediate level (grades 7–9) case study.

In the previous research intermediate technology education was found to be marginalized in relation to other areas of the general curriculum within the Canadian context. As such, this research study sought to understand if marginalization and other related themes were present at the secondary level. The Technology Education Teaching Framework (TETF) which emphasises the role of teacher experience, professional development, and leadership was used as the primary lens of inquiry.

A qualitative case study methodology framed this study. Data were collected via an online questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, and classroom observations from a purposeful typical case sample of Canadian technology education and skilled trades teachers. Two cycle coding was used in conjunction with thematic analysis to analyze and interpret the data.

Secondary technology education and skilled trades teachers share similar beliefs and pedagogical practices as their intermediate counterparts. Themes of professionalism and systemic marginalization emerged as helping and hindering teachers’ efforts. However, at this level there was an identified tension between the values associated with the technology education and skilled trades curricula. Moving forward, raising the profile of technology education is framed within the potential transferability of local strategies and solutions to other jurisdictions with similar circumstances.

Abstract Image

更新技术教育教学框架:支持和阻碍加拿大技术教育教师的因素
本研究论文是加拿大技术教育教学系列案例研究的第二篇。具体而言,本文将结合之前的一项中级(7-9 年级)案例研究,讨论在中学(10-12 年级)技术教育和技术行业教学中,哪些因素对教学有帮助,哪些因素对教学有阻碍。在之前的研究中,我们发现在加拿大,与普通课程的其他领域相比,中级技术教育被边缘化了。因此,本研究试图了解边缘化和其他相关主题是否存在于中学阶段。技术教育教学框架(TETF)强调教师经验、专业发展和领导力的作用,本研究将其作为主要的探究视角。通过在线问卷调查、半结构式访谈和课堂观察,从加拿大技术教育和技术行业教师的典型案例样本中收集数据。在对数据进行分析和解释时,采用了双循环编码法和主题分析法。中等技术教育和技术行业教师与中级教师有着相似的信念和教学实践。专业精神和系统边缘化主题的出现既帮助了教师的努力,也阻碍了教师的努力。然而,在这个层次上,技术教育和技工课程的相关价值观之间存在着明显的紧张关系。展望未来,提高技术教育的地位要考虑到当地的战略和解决方案是否有可能推广到情况类似的其他辖区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Technology and Design Education seeks to encourage research and scholarly writing about any aspect of technology and design education. Critical, review, and comparative studies are particularly prominent, as are contributions which draw upon other literatures, such as those derived from historical, philosophical, sociological or psychological studies of technology or design, in order to address issues of concern to technology and design education. One of the most significant developments of recent years has been the emergence of technology and design education as an integral part of general education in many parts of the world. Its distinctive curriculum features are technological literacy and capability and it highlights the importance of `knowledge in action'', of `doing'' as well as `understanding''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信