{"title":"“Radicalism” and “Conservatism”: The Philosophical Argument of Human Enhancement Technologies (HET) and Its Resolution","authors":"Xianfei Yi, Zhuang Liu","doi":"10.1007/s40647-024-00413-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The philosophical debate between “radicalism” and “conservatism” in emerging human enhancement technologies (HET) has never ceased. Although their theoretical claims seem to be distinct from each other, they actually share certain commonalities, which are mainly manifested in three aspects: first, they both hold certain illusions about emerging HET; second, they both reflect the loss of human subjectivity in the debate; and third, they both leave the premise of their propositions in suspense. Based on the reflection and grasp of these commonalities, we can grasp the possible boundaries of the dissolution of the two oppositions: let HET be “where it is in,” reconfigure anthropocentrism, suspend metaphysical myths, and turn to the “reality of human beings.”</p>","PeriodicalId":43537,"journal":{"name":"Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-024-00413-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The philosophical debate between “radicalism” and “conservatism” in emerging human enhancement technologies (HET) has never ceased. Although their theoretical claims seem to be distinct from each other, they actually share certain commonalities, which are mainly manifested in three aspects: first, they both hold certain illusions about emerging HET; second, they both reflect the loss of human subjectivity in the debate; and third, they both leave the premise of their propositions in suspense. Based on the reflection and grasp of these commonalities, we can grasp the possible boundaries of the dissolution of the two oppositions: let HET be “where it is in,” reconfigure anthropocentrism, suspend metaphysical myths, and turn to the “reality of human beings.”
期刊介绍：
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences (FJHSS) is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes research papers across all academic disciplines in the humanities and social sciences. The Journal aims to promote multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary studies, bridge diverse communities of the humanities and social sciences in the world, provide a platform of academic exchange for scholars and readers from all countries and all regions, promote intellectual development in China’s humanities and social sciences, and encourage original, theoretical, and empirical research into new areas, new issues, and new subject matters. Coverage in FJHSS emphasizes the combination of a “local” focus (e.g., a country- or region-specific perspective) with a “global” concern, and engages in the international scholarly dialogue by offering comparative or global analyses and discussions from multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary perspectives. The journal features special topics, special issues, and original articles of general interest in the disciplines of humanities and social sciences. The journal also invites leading scholars as guest editors to organize special issues or special topics devoted to certain important themes, subject matters, and research agendas in the humanities and social sciences.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
