Katrina P. Merlini, Nicholas A. Moon, Allyson A. McKenzie-James, Jesse R. Caylor, Alexandria Redmond, Dan Nguyen, Phylicia Richardson
{"title":"An Unmet goal? A Scale Development and Model test of the role of Inclusive Leadership","authors":"Katrina P. Merlini, Nicholas A. Moon, Allyson A. McKenzie-James, Jesse R. Caylor, Alexandria Redmond, Dan Nguyen, Phylicia Richardson","doi":"10.1007/s10869-024-09955-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a lack of evidence on whether inclusive leadership (IL) truly fosters inclusion for those in historically marginalized groups. Further, a conceptually up-to-date and practically useful measure of IL is lacking. Thus, in two separate phases, we first present a newly developed measure of IL and then test an empirical model. In Phase 1, results from five demographically diverse samples demonstrate reliability and validity evidence of a 10-item IL scale. In Phase 2, use this scale to examine how IL may support members of historically marginalized groups by fostering (a) interpersonal behaviors that uphold inclusive work environments (allyship, antiracism) and (b) individual experiences of inclusion (workgroup inclusion, authenticity). Path analysis results from a multi-wave study support the influence of IL on these outcomes and also demonstrate support for IL’s indirect effects on outcomes that may be disproportionately high (emotional exhaustion) and low (empowerment) for members of marginalized groups. Moderation analyses reveal many of the hypothesized relationships are similar across groups representing marginalized identities on the bases of race, sex, and the intersection of race and sex. These results add evidence to the importance of IL for fostering inclusive workplaces, especially for those who face the greatest barriers to inclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":48254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Psychology","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09955-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is a lack of evidence on whether inclusive leadership (IL) truly fosters inclusion for those in historically marginalized groups. Further, a conceptually up-to-date and practically useful measure of IL is lacking. Thus, in two separate phases, we first present a newly developed measure of IL and then test an empirical model. In Phase 1, results from five demographically diverse samples demonstrate reliability and validity evidence of a 10-item IL scale. In Phase 2, use this scale to examine how IL may support members of historically marginalized groups by fostering (a) interpersonal behaviors that uphold inclusive work environments (allyship, antiracism) and (b) individual experiences of inclusion (workgroup inclusion, authenticity). Path analysis results from a multi-wave study support the influence of IL on these outcomes and also demonstrate support for IL’s indirect effects on outcomes that may be disproportionately high (emotional exhaustion) and low (empowerment) for members of marginalized groups. Moderation analyses reveal many of the hypothesized relationships are similar across groups representing marginalized identities on the bases of race, sex, and the intersection of race and sex. These results add evidence to the importance of IL for fostering inclusive workplaces, especially for those who face the greatest barriers to inclusion.
关于全纳领导(IL)是否真正促进了历史上被边缘化群体的全纳,目前还缺乏证据。此外,对包容性领导力也缺乏一个概念上与时俱进、实际有用的衡量标准。因此,我们分两个阶段,首先提出了新开发的包容性领导力衡量标准,然后测试了一个实证模型。在第一阶段,来自五个不同人口统计学样本的结果证明了由 10 个项目组成的 IL 量表的可靠性和有效性。在第二阶段,使用该量表研究 IL 如何通过促进(a)维护包容性工作环境的人际行为(同盟关系、反种族主义)和(b)个人的包容性体验(工作组包容性、真实性)来支持历史上被边缘化的群体成员。一项多波研究的路径分析结果表明了 IL 对这些结果的影响,同时也证明了 IL 对边缘化群体成员可能过高(情绪衰竭)和过低(赋权)的结果的间接影响。调节分析表明,许多假设的关系在基于种族、性别以及种族与性别交叉的边缘化身份的群体中是相似的。这些结果进一步证明了 IL 对于促进包容性工作场所的重要性,尤其是对于那些面临最大包容性障碍的人。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business and Psychology (JBP) is an international outlet publishing high quality research designed to advance organizational science and practice. Since its inception in 1986, the journal has published impactful scholarship in Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources Management, Work Psychology, Occupational Psychology, and Vocational Psychology.
Typical subject matters include
Team processes and effectiveness
Customer service and satisfaction
Employee recruitment, selection, and promotion
Employee engagement and withdrawal
Organizational culture and climate
Training, development and coaching
Mentoring and socialization
Performance management, appraisal and feedback
Workplace diversity
Leadership
Workplace health, stress, and safety
Employee attitudes and satisfaction
Careers and retirement
Organizational communication
Technology and work
Employee motivation and job design
Organizational change and development
Employee citizenship and deviance
Organizational effectiveness
Work-nonwork/work-family
Rigorous quantitative, qualitative, field-based, and lab-based empirical studies are welcome. Interdisciplinary scholarship is valued and encouraged. Submitted manuscripts should be well-grounded conceptually and make meaningful contributions to scientific understandingsand/or the advancement of science-based practice.
The Journal of Business and Psychology is
- A high quality/impactful outlet for organizational science research
- A journal dedicated to bridging the science/practice divide
- A journal striving to create interdisciplinary connections
For details on submitting manuscripts, please read the author guidelines found in the far right menu.