Experimental Investigation and Numerical Simulation of Bonded, Bolted, and Hybrid Joints in CFRP Laminates Under Tensile Loading

IF 2.3 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
Yiming Shangguan, Wenjing Wang, Anrui He, Junsheng Qu
{"title":"Experimental Investigation and Numerical Simulation of Bonded, Bolted, and Hybrid Joints in CFRP Laminates Under Tensile Loading","authors":"Yiming Shangguan,&nbsp;Wenjing Wang,&nbsp;Anrui He,&nbsp;Junsheng Qu","doi":"10.1007/s10443-024-10240-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, an in-depth analysis is carried out to simulate the failure mechanism of T700 carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composite (CFRP) joints with a layup sequence of [45/-45/0/90]<sub>3 s</sub> when subjected to tensile loading, both experimentally and numerically. We compared the mechanical performance of three different edge-to-bolt diameter ratios (E/d) of bonded, bolted, and hybrid single lap joints subjected to tensile loading. A finite element-based progressive damage method (PDM) along with the bilinear triangular cohesive zone model (BTCZM) is developed to predict the damage evolution and failure mechanism for all joint configurations. By juxtaposing the simulation outcomes and the experimental data, we observed the failure morphology and assessed the bearing capacity of the joint under tensile loading. The comparison results revealed a minor discrepancy of merely 5.5% in terms of joint load capacity between simulations and experiments, which indicates the high accuracy of our model. The strength of the adhesive and mechanical joints increases with E/d from 3 to 5; however, the strength of the hybrid joints decreases. At E/d = 3, hybrid joints performed significantly better than bonded ones, with a remarkable enhancement of 41.53%. However, for E/d ratios of 4 and 5, both simulation results and test data showed that hybrid joints were inferior to bolted joints. The analytical methodology presented in this paper offers a valuable reference for future analysis and design of composite joints.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":468,"journal":{"name":"Applied Composite Materials","volume":"31 5","pages":"1593 - 1624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Composite Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10443-024-10240-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, an in-depth analysis is carried out to simulate the failure mechanism of T700 carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composite (CFRP) joints with a layup sequence of [45/-45/0/90]3 s when subjected to tensile loading, both experimentally and numerically. We compared the mechanical performance of three different edge-to-bolt diameter ratios (E/d) of bonded, bolted, and hybrid single lap joints subjected to tensile loading. A finite element-based progressive damage method (PDM) along with the bilinear triangular cohesive zone model (BTCZM) is developed to predict the damage evolution and failure mechanism for all joint configurations. By juxtaposing the simulation outcomes and the experimental data, we observed the failure morphology and assessed the bearing capacity of the joint under tensile loading. The comparison results revealed a minor discrepancy of merely 5.5% in terms of joint load capacity between simulations and experiments, which indicates the high accuracy of our model. The strength of the adhesive and mechanical joints increases with E/d from 3 to 5; however, the strength of the hybrid joints decreases. At E/d = 3, hybrid joints performed significantly better than bonded ones, with a remarkable enhancement of 41.53%. However, for E/d ratios of 4 and 5, both simulation results and test data showed that hybrid joints were inferior to bolted joints. The analytical methodology presented in this paper offers a valuable reference for future analysis and design of composite joints.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

拉伸载荷下 CFRP 层压材料中粘接、螺栓连接和混合连接的实验研究与数值模拟
本研究通过实验和数值模拟,深入分析了铺层顺序为 [45/-45/0/90]3 s 的 T700 碳纤维增强聚合物复合材料(CFRP)接头在承受拉伸荷载时的失效机理。我们比较了三种不同边缘与螺栓直径比(E/d)的粘接接头、螺栓接头和混合单搭接接头在承受拉伸荷载时的机械性能。我们开发了基于有限元的渐进损伤法(PDM)和双线性三角内聚区模型(BTCZM),以预测所有接头结构的损伤演变和失效机制。通过将模拟结果与实验数据并列,我们观察了破坏形态,并评估了拉伸荷载下接头的承载能力。对比结果显示,模拟结果与实验结果在接头承载能力方面的差异很小,仅为 5.5%,这表明我们的模型具有很高的准确性。在 E/d 值为 3 到 5 的范围内,粘合剂接头和机械接头的强度随 E/d 值的增加而增加,但混合接头的强度却有所降低。当 E/d = 3 时,混合接头的性能明显优于粘接接头,显著提高了 41.53%。然而,当 E/d 比率为 4 和 5 时,模拟结果和测试数据都表明混合接头的性能不如螺栓接头。本文介绍的分析方法为今后分析和设计复合材料接头提供了宝贵的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Composite Materials
Applied Composite Materials 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Applied Composite Materials is an international journal dedicated to the publication of original full-length papers, review articles and short communications of the highest quality that advance the development and application of engineering composite materials. Its articles identify problems that limit the performance and reliability of the composite material and composite part; and propose solutions that lead to innovation in design and the successful exploitation and commercialization of composite materials across the widest spectrum of engineering uses. The main focus is on the quantitative descriptions of material systems and processing routes. Coverage includes management of time-dependent changes in microscopic and macroscopic structure and its exploitation from the material''s conception through to its eventual obsolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信