General surgery educational resources for Jordanian medical students

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY
Mohammad Nebih Nofal , Mahmoud Mousa Al Awayshish , Ali Jad Yousef , Ammar Masoud Alamaren , Zaid Issam Al-Rabadi , Dina Samer Haddad , Yaqeen Ahmad Al-Rbaihat , Yazeed Nabeel Al-Qusous
{"title":"General surgery educational resources for Jordanian medical students","authors":"Mohammad Nebih Nofal ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Mousa Al Awayshish ,&nbsp;Ali Jad Yousef ,&nbsp;Ammar Masoud Alamaren ,&nbsp;Zaid Issam Al-Rabadi ,&nbsp;Dina Samer Haddad ,&nbsp;Yaqeen Ahmad Al-Rbaihat ,&nbsp;Yazeed Nabeel Al-Qusous","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To outline the resources deemed most beneficial to medical students during their general surgery clerkship, as well as to examine their link to students' general surgery scores and the usage of artificial intelligence in general surgery study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective survey of Jordanian medical students from six universities was done between March and June 2023 using a 7-item questionnaire covering questions concerning general surgery study methods and scores. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate demographic data. Chi-square is used to evaluate categorical data, with a <em>P</em> value &lt;0.05 deemed significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average age of respondents was 23.3 years, and 54.2 % of the respondents were females, 47.8 % were from Mutah University. Most students (48.2 %) relied on tutor lectures. Students who studied through instructor lectures had the highest grades (9 % excellent, 17 % very good), followed by students who studied using surgery textbooks (6.8 % and 14.6 %, respectively). The relationship between the study method and academic achievement was statistically significant (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Traditional face-to-face learning with instructor lectures and surgery textbooks is still the most efficient approach to attain the greatest scores. Medical students are still underutilizing artificial intelligence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"20 ","pages":"Pages 62-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258984502400071X/pdfft?md5=bd8bbe009d764663aa2b574cae0c454d&pid=1-s2.0-S258984502400071X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258984502400071X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To outline the resources deemed most beneficial to medical students during their general surgery clerkship, as well as to examine their link to students' general surgery scores and the usage of artificial intelligence in general surgery study.

Methods

A retrospective survey of Jordanian medical students from six universities was done between March and June 2023 using a 7-item questionnaire covering questions concerning general surgery study methods and scores. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate demographic data. Chi-square is used to evaluate categorical data, with a P value <0.05 deemed significant.

Results

The average age of respondents was 23.3 years, and 54.2 % of the respondents were females, 47.8 % were from Mutah University. Most students (48.2 %) relied on tutor lectures. Students who studied through instructor lectures had the highest grades (9 % excellent, 17 % very good), followed by students who studied using surgery textbooks (6.8 % and 14.6 %, respectively). The relationship between the study method and academic achievement was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Traditional face-to-face learning with instructor lectures and surgery textbooks is still the most efficient approach to attain the greatest scores. Medical students are still underutilizing artificial intelligence.

为约旦医科学生提供普通外科教育资源
背景概述在普外科实习期间被认为对医学生最有益的资源,并研究这些资源与学生的普外科成绩以及人工智能在普外科学习中的应用之间的联系。方法在2023年3月至6月期间,对来自6所大学的约旦医学生进行了回顾性调查,使用了一份包含7个项目的调查问卷,其中涉及有关普外科学习方法和成绩的问题。描述性统计用于评估人口统计学数据。结果受访者的平均年龄为 23.3 岁,54.2% 的受访者为女性,47.8% 的受访者来自穆塔大学。大多数学生(48.2%)依靠导师授课。通过教师授课学习的学生成绩最好(9%为优秀,17%为非常好),其次是使用手术教科书学习的学生(分别为 6.8%和 14.6%)。学习方法与学习成绩之间的关系具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论传统的面授学习方式,即教师讲课和外科教科书仍然是获得最高分的最有效方法。医学生对人工智能的利用仍然不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信