J.Z. Bennett , Daphne M. Brydon , Jeffrey T. Ward , Dylan B. Jackson , Leah Ouellet , Rebecca Turner , Laura S. Abrams
{"title":"In the wake of Miller and Montgomery: A national view of people sentenced to juvenile life without parole","authors":"J.Z. Bennett , Daphne M. Brydon , Jeffrey T. Ward , Dylan B. Jackson , Leah Ouellet , Rebecca Turner , Laura S. Abrams","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The movement to end mass incarceration has largely concentrated on people serving shorter sentences for non-violent offenses. There has been less consideration for the 1 in 7 people in prison serving life sentences, overwhelmingly for violent offenses, including those serving juvenile life without parole (JLWOP). Recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions result in a pressing need for data on second chance considerations for JLWOP. This study tracks outcomes of the national population of juvenile lifers.</p></div><div><h3>Data/methods</h3><p>We cross-reference data to identify the JLWOP population at the time of <em>Miller</em> (<em>N</em> = 2904) to build a demographic profile and track resentencing, release, and mortality statuses<em>.</em> Statistics and data visualization are used to establish national and state-level baselines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Findings reveal more than 2500 individuals have been resentenced and more than 1000 have been released. There is notable state variation in the number of JLWOP sentences, the extent to which JLWOP is still allowed, sentence review mechanisms, and percentage of juvenile lifers released.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions/implications</h3><p>The present study provides an important foundation for subsequent work to examine equity in the implementation of <em>Miller</em> and <em>Montgomery</em> within and across states, and to study reentry of an aging population that has spent critical life stages behind bars.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 102199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235224000485/pdfft?md5=d9ac3a70b7a304c58ee41de0305e7bfd&pid=1-s2.0-S0047235224000485-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235224000485","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The movement to end mass incarceration has largely concentrated on people serving shorter sentences for non-violent offenses. There has been less consideration for the 1 in 7 people in prison serving life sentences, overwhelmingly for violent offenses, including those serving juvenile life without parole (JLWOP). Recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions result in a pressing need for data on second chance considerations for JLWOP. This study tracks outcomes of the national population of juvenile lifers.
Data/methods
We cross-reference data to identify the JLWOP population at the time of Miller (N = 2904) to build a demographic profile and track resentencing, release, and mortality statuses. Statistics and data visualization are used to establish national and state-level baselines.
Results
Findings reveal more than 2500 individuals have been resentenced and more than 1000 have been released. There is notable state variation in the number of JLWOP sentences, the extent to which JLWOP is still allowed, sentence review mechanisms, and percentage of juvenile lifers released.
Conclusions/implications
The present study provides an important foundation for subsequent work to examine equity in the implementation of Miller and Montgomery within and across states, and to study reentry of an aging population that has spent critical life stages behind bars.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest.
Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.