Artificial and biological supports are different for pea plants.

Plant signaling & behavior Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1080/15592324.2024.2355739
Bianca Bonato, Valentina Simonetti, Silvia Guerra, Umberto Castiello
{"title":"Artificial and biological supports are different for pea plants.","authors":"Bianca Bonato, Valentina Simonetti, Silvia Guerra, Umberto Castiello","doi":"10.1080/15592324.2024.2355739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies on the kinematics of pea plants' ascent and attach behavior have demonstrated that the signature of their movement varies depending on the kind of support. So far, these studies have been confined to artificial supports (e.g. wooden sticks). Little is known regarding the conditions under which pea plants could rely on biological supports (e.g. neighboring plants) for climbing toward the light. In this study, we capitalize on the 3D kinematic analysis of movement to ascertain whether pea plants scale their kinematics differently depending on whether they aim for artificial or biological support. Results suggest that biological support determines a smoother and more accurate behavior than that elicited by the artificial one. These results shed light on pea plants' ability to detect and classify the properties of objects and implement a movement plan attuned to the very nature of the support. We contend that such differences depend on the augmented multisensory experience elicited by the biological support.</p>","PeriodicalId":94172,"journal":{"name":"Plant signaling & behavior","volume":"19 1","pages":"2355739"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant signaling & behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2024.2355739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies on the kinematics of pea plants' ascent and attach behavior have demonstrated that the signature of their movement varies depending on the kind of support. So far, these studies have been confined to artificial supports (e.g. wooden sticks). Little is known regarding the conditions under which pea plants could rely on biological supports (e.g. neighboring plants) for climbing toward the light. In this study, we capitalize on the 3D kinematic analysis of movement to ascertain whether pea plants scale their kinematics differently depending on whether they aim for artificial or biological support. Results suggest that biological support determines a smoother and more accurate behavior than that elicited by the artificial one. These results shed light on pea plants' ability to detect and classify the properties of objects and implement a movement plan attuned to the very nature of the support. We contend that such differences depend on the augmented multisensory experience elicited by the biological support.

对于豌豆植物来说,人工和生物支架是不同的。
以前对豌豆植物上升和附着行为的运动学研究表明,其运动特征因支撑物的种类而异。迄今为止,这些研究仅限于人工支撑物(如木棍)。至于豌豆植物在何种条件下可以依靠生物支撑物(如邻近植物)爬向光源,目前还知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们利用运动的三维运动学分析来确定豌豆植物是否会根据它们的目标是人工支撑还是生物支撑而对其运动学进行不同程度的调整。结果表明,与人工支撑相比,生物支撑决定了豌豆植物更平滑、更精确的行为。这些结果揭示了豌豆植物检测和分类物体特性的能力,以及根据支撑物的性质实施运动计划的能力。我们认为,这种差异取决于生物支架所引发的增强型多感官体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信