Accuracy of patient-specific implants versus CAD/CAM splints with the mandible-first approach in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for skeletal Class II malocclusion.

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to compare the accuracy of patient-specific implants (PSI) versus mandible-first computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) splints for maxilla repositioning in orthognathic surgery of skeletal Class II malocclusion patients. The main predictor was the surgical method (PSI vs. splints), with the primary outcome being the discrepancy in maxilla centroid position, and secondary outcomes being translation and orientation discrepancies. A total of 82 patients were enrolled (70 female, 12 male; mean age 25.5 years), 41 in each group. The PSI group exhibited a median maxillary position discrepancy of 1.25 mm (interquartile range (IQR) 1.03 mm), significantly lower than the splint group's 1.98 mm (IQR 1.64 mm) (P < 0.001). In the PSI group, the largest median translation discrepancy was 0.74 mm (IQR 1.17 mm) in the anteroposterior direction, while the largest orientation discrepancy was 1.83° (IQR 1.63°) in pitch. In the splint group, the largest median translation discrepancy was 1.14 mm (IQR 1.37 mm) in the anteroposterior direction, while the largest orientation discrepancy was 3.03° (IQR 2.11°) in pitch. In conclusion, among patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion, the application of PSI in orthognathic surgery yielded increased precision in maxillary positioning compared to mandible-first CAD/CAM splints.