Disability level and use of long-term care services in Norway: a nation-wide registry study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lisa Victoria Burrell, Øystein Døhl, Siri Rostoft, Nina Berggaard, Iryna Antonova, Inger Johanne Landsjøåsen Bakken
{"title":"Disability level and use of long-term care services in Norway: a nation-wide registry study.","authors":"Lisa Victoria Burrell, Øystein Døhl, Siri Rostoft, Nina Berggaard, Iryna Antonova, Inger Johanne Landsjøåsen Bakken","doi":"10.1177/14034948241251914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In Norway, disability level is an important criterion when deciding the type and level of long-term care services. Each care recipient can be scored on 20 different disability level measures. Our aims were to investigate completeness in disability level information in the Norwegian Registry of Primary Health Care (NRPHC), to group disability level measures into meaningful groups, and to study the relationship between grouped disability scores and the type of services received.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved information on type of care and disability level from the NRPHC on individuals who received long-term care services in 2022. Type of care was divided into hierarchical and mutually exclusive groups, with long-term institutional care as the most complex service group. We used principal components analysis to summarise and visualise the information in the 20 different disability level measures, and to create grouped scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 386,697 persons aged 0-104 years were registered as recipients of long-term care services in Norway on 31 December 2022. Information on disability measures were of high completeness (72.4 % of the population were registered with all 20 measures) but was lower for younger age groups in which the number of recipients was lower. Principal components analyses identified two groups of measures, which we termed physical and cognitive functioning. Physical and cognitive functioning were poorest for individuals receiving the most complex and extensive services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>NRPHC disability data are reasonably complete, the 20 measures readily fall into two distinct categories, and seem to reflect real life differences in disability.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948241251914","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: In Norway, disability level is an important criterion when deciding the type and level of long-term care services. Each care recipient can be scored on 20 different disability level measures. Our aims were to investigate completeness in disability level information in the Norwegian Registry of Primary Health Care (NRPHC), to group disability level measures into meaningful groups, and to study the relationship between grouped disability scores and the type of services received.

Methods: We retrieved information on type of care and disability level from the NRPHC on individuals who received long-term care services in 2022. Type of care was divided into hierarchical and mutually exclusive groups, with long-term institutional care as the most complex service group. We used principal components analysis to summarise and visualise the information in the 20 different disability level measures, and to create grouped scores.

Results: A total of 386,697 persons aged 0-104 years were registered as recipients of long-term care services in Norway on 31 December 2022. Information on disability measures were of high completeness (72.4 % of the population were registered with all 20 measures) but was lower for younger age groups in which the number of recipients was lower. Principal components analyses identified two groups of measures, which we termed physical and cognitive functioning. Physical and cognitive functioning were poorest for individuals receiving the most complex and extensive services.

Conclusions: NRPHC disability data are reasonably complete, the 20 measures readily fall into two distinct categories, and seem to reflect real life differences in disability.

挪威的残疾程度和长期护理服务的使用情况:一项全国范围的登记研究。
目的:在挪威,残疾程度是决定长期护理服务类型和水平的一个重要标准。每个护理对象都可以根据 20 种不同的残疾程度测量方法进行评分。我们的目的是调查挪威初级卫生保健登记处(NRPHC)中残疾等级信息的完整性,将残疾等级测量结果分成有意义的组别,并研究分组后的残疾评分与所接受服务类型之间的关系:我们从 NRPHC 中检索了 2022 年接受长期护理服务的个人的护理类型和残疾程度信息。护理类型被划分为层次分明且相互排斥的组别,其中长期机构护理是最复杂的服务组别。我们使用主成分分析法对 20 种不同残疾等级测量的信息进行总结和可视化,并创建分组得分:截至2022年12月31日,挪威共有386,697名年龄在0-104岁之间的人登记接受了长期护理服务。残疾计量信息的完整性较高(72.4%的人口登记了所有20项计量信息),但在接受者人数较少的低年龄组中,信息的完整性较低。主成分分析确定了两组测量指标,我们称之为身体功能和认知功能。在接受最复杂和最广泛服务的人群中,身体和认知功能最差: 结论:国家残疾人康复中心的残疾数据相当完整,20 项衡量指标可轻松分为两个不同的类别,而且似乎反映了现实生活中的残疾差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信