Clinical competency of nurses trained in competency-based versus objective-based education in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a qualitative study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Mari Nagai, Miyuki Oikawa, Tomoko Komagata, Josué Désiré Bapitani Basuana, Gérard Kahombo Ulyabo, Yui Minagawa, Sadatoshi Matsuoka, Yuriko Egami, Mari Honda, Toyomitsu Tamura
{"title":"Clinical competency of nurses trained in competency-based versus objective-based education in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a qualitative study.","authors":"Mari Nagai, Miyuki Oikawa, Tomoko Komagata, Josué Désiré Bapitani Basuana, Gérard Kahombo Ulyabo, Yui Minagawa, Sadatoshi Matsuoka, Yuriko Egami, Mari Honda, Toyomitsu Tamura","doi":"10.1186/s12960-024-00921-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Designing competency-based education (CBE) programmes is a priority in global nursing education for better nursing care for the population. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), object-based education (OBE) remains mainstream in pre-service nursing education programmes. Recently, the Ministry of Health developed a self-assessment tool and quantitatively compared the clinical competency of CBE- and OBE-trained nurses. This study aimed to qualitatively triangulate the results of self-evaluation by exploring perception of supervisors, incumbent CBE-, and OBE-trained nurses in comparison with the competence of the two types of nurses, and to identify influential factors or barriers to their competence in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive approach with conventional content analysis was applied. Twenty interviews with clinical supervisors who oversaw both CBE- and OBE-trained nurses, 22 focus group discussions (FGDs) with CBE-trained nurses, and 21 FGDs with OBA-trained nurses currently working in health facilities were conducted. Participants of the FGDs were selected from the participants of the DRC self-assessment competency comparison study where there was no statistically significance between CBE- and OBE-trained nurses in the demographic characteristics. Data were analysed in terms of the competencies identified by the Ministry of Health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The supervisors recognised that the CBE-trained nurses had stronger competencies in professional communication, making decisions about health problems, and engaging in professional development, but were weak in clinical skills. This study identified challenges for supervisors in assuring standardised care in health facilities with OBE- and CBE-trained nurses, as well as barriers for CBE-trained nurses as a minority in the workplace in demonstrating their competencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results support the Ministry of Health's policy to expand CBE in pre-service education programmes but reveal that its slow implementation impedes full utilisation of the acquired competencies at health facilities. Implementation could be accelerated by strengthening cooperation among the Ministry of Health's three human resource departments, and developing and implementing a well-planned, legally binding, long-term CBE reform strategy, including an approach to the Continuing Professional Development system.</p>","PeriodicalId":39823,"journal":{"name":"Human Resources for Health","volume":"22 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11151529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resources for Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-024-00921-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Designing competency-based education (CBE) programmes is a priority in global nursing education for better nursing care for the population. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), object-based education (OBE) remains mainstream in pre-service nursing education programmes. Recently, the Ministry of Health developed a self-assessment tool and quantitatively compared the clinical competency of CBE- and OBE-trained nurses. This study aimed to qualitatively triangulate the results of self-evaluation by exploring perception of supervisors, incumbent CBE-, and OBE-trained nurses in comparison with the competence of the two types of nurses, and to identify influential factors or barriers to their competence in clinical settings.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach with conventional content analysis was applied. Twenty interviews with clinical supervisors who oversaw both CBE- and OBE-trained nurses, 22 focus group discussions (FGDs) with CBE-trained nurses, and 21 FGDs with OBA-trained nurses currently working in health facilities were conducted. Participants of the FGDs were selected from the participants of the DRC self-assessment competency comparison study where there was no statistically significance between CBE- and OBE-trained nurses in the demographic characteristics. Data were analysed in terms of the competencies identified by the Ministry of Health.

Results: The supervisors recognised that the CBE-trained nurses had stronger competencies in professional communication, making decisions about health problems, and engaging in professional development, but were weak in clinical skills. This study identified challenges for supervisors in assuring standardised care in health facilities with OBE- and CBE-trained nurses, as well as barriers for CBE-trained nurses as a minority in the workplace in demonstrating their competencies.

Conclusions: The study results support the Ministry of Health's policy to expand CBE in pre-service education programmes but reveal that its slow implementation impedes full utilisation of the acquired competencies at health facilities. Implementation could be accelerated by strengthening cooperation among the Ministry of Health's three human resource departments, and developing and implementing a well-planned, legally binding, long-term CBE reform strategy, including an approach to the Continuing Professional Development system.

刚果民主共和国接受能力本位教育与目标本位教育的护士的临床能力:一项定性研究。
背景:设计能力本位教育(CBE)课程是全球护理教育的优先事项,目的是为民众提供更好的护理服务。在刚果民主共和国(DRC),基于对象的教育(OBE)仍然是职前护理教育课程的主流。最近,刚果(金)卫生部开发了一种自我评估工具,并对接受 CBE 和 OBE 培训的护士的临床能力进行了定量比较。本研究旨在通过探讨主管、在职 CBE 和 OBE 培训护士对两类护士能力的认知对比,对自我评估结果进行定性三角测量,并找出临床环境中影响护士能力的因素或障碍:采用常规内容分析的定性描述方法。对同时监督 CBE 和 OBE 培训护士的临床主管进行了 20 次访谈,对目前在医疗机构工作的 CBE 培训护士进行了 22 次焦点小组讨论(FGD),对 OBA 培训护士进行了 21 次焦点小组讨论。FGD 的参与者是从刚果(金)自我评估能力对比研究的参与者中挑选出来的,在该研究中,接受 CBE 培训的护士和接受 OBE 培训的护士在人口统计学特征方面没有显著差异。根据卫生部确定的能力对数据进行了分析:督导人员认为,接受 CBE 培训的护士在专业交流、对健康问题做出决策以及参与专业发展方面的能力较强,但临床技能较弱。这项研究发现了主管人员在确保卫生机构中由接受过 OBE 和 CBE 培训的护士提供标准化护理方面所面临的挑战,以及作为工作场所中的少数群体,接受过 CBE 培训的护士在展示其能力方面所面临的障碍:研究结果支持卫生部在职前教育课程中扩大 CBE 的政策,但研究结果表明,CBE 的缓慢实施阻碍了卫生机构对所学能力的充分利用。通过加强卫生部三个人力资源部门之间的合作,制定并实施一项计划周密、具有法律约束力的长期 CBE 改革战略,包括持续职业发展系统的方法,可以加快实施进度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Resources for Health
Human Resources for Health Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
102
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Resources for Health is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal covering all aspects of planning, producing and managing the health workforce - all those who provide health services worldwide. Human Resources for Health aims to disseminate research on health workforce policy, the health labour market, health workforce practice, development of knowledge tools and implementation mechanisms nationally and internationally; as well as specific features of the health workforce, such as the impact of management of health workers" performance and its link with health outcomes. The journal encourages debate on health sector reforms and their link with human resources issues, a hitherto-neglected area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信