Clinical factors predicting objective response to bevacizumab-based chemotherapies in advanced and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nijat Khanmammadov, Izzet Dogan, Necla S Okay, Bayarmaa Khishigsuren, Abdulmunir Azizy, Pinar Saip, Khayal Gasimli, Adnan Aydiner
{"title":"Clinical factors predicting objective response to bevacizumab-based chemotherapies in advanced and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.","authors":"Nijat Khanmammadov, Izzet Dogan, Necla S Okay, Bayarmaa Khishigsuren, Abdulmunir Azizy, Pinar Saip, Khayal Gasimli, Adnan Aydiner","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05540-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bevacizumab-based chemotherapies are commonly administered in the treatment of patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The primary aim of this study was to assess the factors that predict the objective response to bevacizumab-based therapies in cases of advanced and recurrent EOC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective data of 264 patients with EOC from the current study were collected between 2009 and 2022 at our clinic. Survival analyses were conducted utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the factors predicting the objective response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A predominant subset of patients (83%) presented with serous adenocarcinoma, exhibiting a high-grade differentiation at 87%. The vast majority (80%) of the cohort experienced disease recurrence. Three-fourths of the cases received bevacizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. In the multivariate analysis, clinical factors such as a disease recurrence (P=0.031), upfront tumor debulking surgery before bevacizumab (P=0.009), doublet chemotherapy (P=0.003), and the presence of malignant pleural effusion (P=0.024) emerged as significant determinants influencing the Objective Response Rate (ORR) in patients undergoing bevacizumab-based therapy. The ORR was 67.5% (N.=178), comprising 15.2% complete responses (N.=40) and 52.1% partial responses (N.=138). The median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were estimated at 10.2 months (95% CI, 8.60-11.9) and 20.1 months (95% CI, 16.0-24.2), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The responses to bevacizumab-based chemotherapies could be predict by the presence of malignant pleural effusion, disease recurrence, upfront tumor debulking surgery and doublet regimen of chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05540-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bevacizumab-based chemotherapies are commonly administered in the treatment of patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The primary aim of this study was to assess the factors that predict the objective response to bevacizumab-based therapies in cases of advanced and recurrent EOC.

Methods: The retrospective data of 264 patients with EOC from the current study were collected between 2009 and 2022 at our clinic. Survival analyses were conducted utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the factors predicting the objective response.

Results: A predominant subset of patients (83%) presented with serous adenocarcinoma, exhibiting a high-grade differentiation at 87%. The vast majority (80%) of the cohort experienced disease recurrence. Three-fourths of the cases received bevacizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. In the multivariate analysis, clinical factors such as a disease recurrence (P=0.031), upfront tumor debulking surgery before bevacizumab (P=0.009), doublet chemotherapy (P=0.003), and the presence of malignant pleural effusion (P=0.024) emerged as significant determinants influencing the Objective Response Rate (ORR) in patients undergoing bevacizumab-based therapy. The ORR was 67.5% (N.=178), comprising 15.2% complete responses (N.=40) and 52.1% partial responses (N.=138). The median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were estimated at 10.2 months (95% CI, 8.60-11.9) and 20.1 months (95% CI, 16.0-24.2), respectively.

Conclusions: The responses to bevacizumab-based chemotherapies could be predict by the presence of malignant pleural effusion, disease recurrence, upfront tumor debulking surgery and doublet regimen of chemotherapy.

预测晚期和复发性上皮性卵巢癌患者对贝伐单抗化疗客观反应的临床因素。
背景:以贝伐单抗为基础的化疗通常用于治疗上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者。本研究的主要目的是评估预测晚期和复发性EOC患者对贝伐单抗疗法客观反应的因素:2009年至2022年期间,我们在诊所收集了264名EOC患者的回顾性数据。采用卡普兰-梅耶法和对数秩检验进行生存期分析。采用二元逻辑回归分析评估预测客观反应的因素:绝大多数患者(83%)为浆液性腺癌,87%为高级别分化。绝大多数患者(80%)疾病复发。四分之三的病例接受了贝伐单抗联合铂类双联化疗。在多变量分析中,疾病复发(P=0.031)、贝伐珠单抗前的前期肿瘤剥除手术(P=0.009)、双联化疗(P=0.003)和存在恶性胸腔积液(P=0.024)等临床因素成为影响接受贝伐珠单抗治疗患者客观反应率(ORR)的重要决定因素。ORR为67.5%(178例),包括15.2%的完全应答(40例)和52.1%的部分应答(138例)。中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)估计分别为10.2个月(95% CI,8.60-11.9)和20.1个月(95% CI,16.0-24.2):以贝伐单抗为基础的化疗反应可通过恶性胸腔积液的存在、疾病复发、前期肿瘤剥离手术和双联化疗方案进行预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
191
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信