Effect of Phytic Acid Etching and Airborne-Particle Abrasion Treatment on the Resin Bond Strength.

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-05-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CCIDE.S456826
Milagros Falcon Aguilar, Marcela Alvarez Ferretti, Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins, Jardel Dos Santos Silva, Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima, Giselle Maria Marchi, Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar
{"title":"Effect of Phytic Acid Etching and Airborne-Particle Abrasion Treatment on the Resin Bond Strength.","authors":"Milagros Falcon Aguilar, Marcela Alvarez Ferretti, Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins, Jardel Dos Santos Silva, Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima, Giselle Maria Marchi, Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar","doi":"10.2147/CCIDE.S456826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of a universal adhesive to dentin (μTBS) using different time periods of airborne particle abrasion (APA) and two types of acid etching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-two human third molars were divided into 9 groups (n=8) according to dentin pretreatment: APA duration (0, 5, or 10s) and acid etching (no acid - NA, 37% phosphoric acid - PhoA, or 1% phytic acid - PhyA). APA was performed at a 0.5 cm distance and air pressure of 60 psi using 50 μm aluminum oxide particles. Afterwards, two coats of Single Bond Universal adhesive (3M) were applied to the dentin surface. Composite blocks were built using the incremental technique, sectioned into 1×1 mm slices and subjected to microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing. Fracture patterns and surface topography of each dentinal pretreatment were evaluated using a Scanning electron microscope (SEM). Bond strength data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni <i>post-hoc</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group that received pretreatment with 5s APA and PhoA presented higher μTBS values among all groups, which was statistically different when compared with the PhoA, 10APA+PhoA, and 5APA+PhyA groups. PhyA did not significantly influence the bond strength of the air-abraded groups. Finally, adhesive failure was considered the predominant failure in all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dentin pretreated by airborne particle abrasion using aluminum oxide demonstrated an increase in bond strength when abraded for 5 seconds and conditioned with phosphoric acid in a universal adhesive system.</p>","PeriodicalId":10445,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11149625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S456826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of a universal adhesive to dentin (μTBS) using different time periods of airborne particle abrasion (APA) and two types of acid etching.

Methods: Seventy-two human third molars were divided into 9 groups (n=8) according to dentin pretreatment: APA duration (0, 5, or 10s) and acid etching (no acid - NA, 37% phosphoric acid - PhoA, or 1% phytic acid - PhyA). APA was performed at a 0.5 cm distance and air pressure of 60 psi using 50 μm aluminum oxide particles. Afterwards, two coats of Single Bond Universal adhesive (3M) were applied to the dentin surface. Composite blocks were built using the incremental technique, sectioned into 1×1 mm slices and subjected to microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing. Fracture patterns and surface topography of each dentinal pretreatment were evaluated using a Scanning electron microscope (SEM). Bond strength data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc tests.

Results: The group that received pretreatment with 5s APA and PhoA presented higher μTBS values among all groups, which was statistically different when compared with the PhoA, 10APA+PhoA, and 5APA+PhyA groups. PhyA did not significantly influence the bond strength of the air-abraded groups. Finally, adhesive failure was considered the predominant failure in all groups.

Conclusion: Dentin pretreated by airborne particle abrasion using aluminum oxide demonstrated an increase in bond strength when abraded for 5 seconds and conditioned with phosphoric acid in a universal adhesive system.

植酸蚀刻和空气颗粒磨损处理对树脂粘接强度的影响
目的:本研究旨在评估通用粘合剂与牙本质(μTBS)的粘接强度:本研究旨在评估通用粘接剂与牙本质(μTBS)在不同时间段的空气颗粒磨蚀(APA)和两种类型的酸蚀中的粘接强度:72颗人类第三磨牙根据牙本质预处理情况分为9组(n=8):APA持续时间(0、5或10秒)和酸蚀(无酸-NA、37%磷酸-PhoA或1%植酸-PhyA)。APA 在 0.5 厘米的距离和 60 psi 的气压下使用 50 μm 的氧化铝颗粒进行。然后,在牙本质表面涂上两层 Single Bond 通用粘合剂(3M)。使用增量技术制作复合材料块,切成 1×1 毫米的薄片,并进行微拉伸粘接强度(μTBS)测试。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对每种牙本质预处理的断裂形态和表面形貌进行评估。粘接强度数据采用双向方差分析和 Bonferroni 事后检验进行分析:与 PhoA 组、10APA+PhoA 组和 5APA+PhyA 组相比,接受 5s APA 和 PhoA 预处理的组在所有组中的μTBS 值更高,这在统计学上是有差异的。PhyA 对空气降解组的粘接强度没有明显影响。最后,粘接失败被认为是所有组别中最主要的失败原因:结论:使用氧化铝进行空气颗粒磨蚀预处理的牙本质在磨蚀 5 秒钟并用磷酸在通用粘合剂系统中进行调节后,粘接强度有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
43
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信