Impact of Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices on Disabling Stroke After TAVR: Updated Results From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Neel M Butala, Samir R Kapadia, Eric A Secemsky, Dianne Gallup, Andrzej S Kosinski, Sreekanth Vemulapalli, John C Messenger, Robert W Yeh, David J Cohen
{"title":"Impact of Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices on Disabling Stroke After TAVR: Updated Results From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.","authors":"Neel M Butala, Samir R Kapadia, Eric A Secemsky, Dianne Gallup, Andrzej S Kosinski, Sreekanth Vemulapalli, John C Messenger, Robert W Yeh, David J Cohen","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral embolic protection devices (EPDs) were developed to mitigate the risk of stroke during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but their benefit remains unproven. In the PROTECTED-TAVR trial (Stroke Protection With Sentinel During Transcatheter), EPD use did not reduce periprocedural stroke (primary study outcome) but led to a 62% reduction in the secondary end point of disabling stroke. Given these results, the impact of EPDs during TAVR remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used STS/ACC TVT registry data to examine the association between EPD use and a proxy for disabling stroke among transfemoral TAVR patients between January 2018 and June 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital disabling stroke-defined as stroke associated with either in-hospital death or discharge to a nonhome location. We evaluated the association between EPD use and disabling stroke using instrumental variable analysis with a site-level preference for EPD use as the instrument-a quasi-experimental approach that can support causal inference. In addition, we performed a propensity score-based comparison using overlap weighting as a secondary analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of 414 649 patients of whom 53 389 (12.9%) received an EPD. The unadjusted rate of in-hospital disabling stroke was 0.7% among the EPD group and 0.9% in the no-EPD group. EPD use was associated with a reduction in disabling stroke in both instrumental variable analysis (relative risk, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.73-1.00]) and propensity-weighted analysis (odds ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.70-0.90]) but was not associated with a reduction in nondisabling stroke. In subgroup analyses, the benefit of EPD was greater among those with versus without prior stroke (<i>P</i><sub>interaction</sub><0.05 for both instrumental variable and propensity-weighted analyses).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the largest study to date, among patients undergoing TAVR, EPD use was associated with a small, borderline significant reduction in stroke associated with death or discharge to a nonhome location (a proxy for disabling stroke) that is likely to be causal in nature. Taken together with previous mechanistic and clinical studies, these findings provide credible evidence that EPDs benefit patients undergoing TAVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e013697"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11408089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013697","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cerebral embolic protection devices (EPDs) were developed to mitigate the risk of stroke during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but their benefit remains unproven. In the PROTECTED-TAVR trial (Stroke Protection With Sentinel During Transcatheter), EPD use did not reduce periprocedural stroke (primary study outcome) but led to a 62% reduction in the secondary end point of disabling stroke. Given these results, the impact of EPDs during TAVR remains unclear.

Methods: We used STS/ACC TVT registry data to examine the association between EPD use and a proxy for disabling stroke among transfemoral TAVR patients between January 2018 and June 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital disabling stroke-defined as stroke associated with either in-hospital death or discharge to a nonhome location. We evaluated the association between EPD use and disabling stroke using instrumental variable analysis with a site-level preference for EPD use as the instrument-a quasi-experimental approach that can support causal inference. In addition, we performed a propensity score-based comparison using overlap weighting as a secondary analysis.

Results: The study population consisted of 414 649 patients of whom 53 389 (12.9%) received an EPD. The unadjusted rate of in-hospital disabling stroke was 0.7% among the EPD group and 0.9% in the no-EPD group. EPD use was associated with a reduction in disabling stroke in both instrumental variable analysis (relative risk, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.73-1.00]) and propensity-weighted analysis (odds ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.70-0.90]) but was not associated with a reduction in nondisabling stroke. In subgroup analyses, the benefit of EPD was greater among those with versus without prior stroke (Pinteraction<0.05 for both instrumental variable and propensity-weighted analyses).

Conclusions: In the largest study to date, among patients undergoing TAVR, EPD use was associated with a small, borderline significant reduction in stroke associated with death or discharge to a nonhome location (a proxy for disabling stroke) that is likely to be causal in nature. Taken together with previous mechanistic and clinical studies, these findings provide credible evidence that EPDs benefit patients undergoing TAVR.

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后脑栓塞保护装置对致残性中风的影响:STS/ACC TVT 登记的最新结果。
背景:开发脑栓塞保护装置(EPD)是为了降低经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中的卒中风险,但其益处仍未得到证实。在 PROTECTED-TAVR 试验中,EPD 的使用并未减少围手术期卒中(主要研究结果),但却使次要终点致残性卒中减少了 62%。鉴于这些结果,TAVR 期间 EPD 的影响仍不明确。方法:我们使用 STS/ACC TVT 登记数据研究了 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月期间经股动脉 TAVR 患者使用 EPD 与致残性卒中替代物之间的关系。主要结果是院内致残性卒中,定义为与院内死亡或出院到非家庭所在地相关的卒中。我们使用工具变量(IV)分析评估了使用 EPD 与失能性卒中之间的关系,并将使用 EPD 的医院水平偏好作为工具--这是一种支持因果推断的准实验方法。此外,作为辅助分析,我们还使用重叠加权法进行了基于倾向分数的比较。研究结果研究对象包括 414,649 名患者,其中 53,389 人(12.9%)接受了 EPD。在 EPD 组中,未经调整的院内致残性中风发生率为 0.7%,而在无 EPD 组中为 0.9%。在 IV 分析(RR 0.87;95% CI:0.73-1.00)和倾向加权(PW)分析(OR 0.79;95% CI:0.70-0.90)中,使用 EPD 与致残性中风的减少有关,但与非致残性中风的减少无关。在亚组分析中,EPD 对既往中风患者和非既往中风患者的益处更大(交互作用 p 结论:在迄今为止最大规模的研究中,在接受 TAVR 的患者中,使用 EPD 可使与死亡或出院到非居家地点(代表致残性卒中)相关的卒中发生率略有显著下降,但这种下降可能是因果性的。结合之前的机理和临床研究,这些发现提供了可信的证据,证明 EPD 对接受 TAVR 的患者有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信